The omnibus workforce and business development finance and policy bill has passed the House, after being praised by DFLers for protecting workers and criticized by Republicans as bad for business owners.
The Senate passed its version 37-30 April 15. A conference committee is expected to work out the differences.
"We will only fully be beyond the economic struggles of COVID-19 when all Minnesotans are truly able to once again succeed and thrive," said Rep. Rob Ecklund (DFL-International Falls). "The investments and bold strategies in this bill will help us reach that vision."
Republicans said the bill does not help to reopen businesses or provide them economic relief and creates more mandates at an especially bad time.
"This is a jobs killer," said Rep. Matt Bliss (R-Pennington). "There's absolutely no provisions in here for job creators."
The bill would adjust fiscal year 2021 General Fund spending and appropriate $297.5 million from the General Fund next biennium. Among the most notable spending proposals, it would allocate:
A significant portion of the bill is the family and medical benefits program, which is also moving separately as HF1200. Sponsored by Rep. Ruth Richardson (DFL-Mendota Heights), it would establish a state-run insurance program to partially reimburse lost wages for workers taking medical or family leave.
Modeled after the state’s unemployment insurance benefit program, the family and medical benefits program would provide partial wage replacement for up to 12 weeks per year for a worker’s own serious health condition, and up to 12 weeks per year for care of a family member’s serious health condition.
Noor said the bill represents “a major shift” in how workforce development grants would be structured and distributed. For example, it would require 65% of the money in the workforce development fund be prioritized for individuals who are Black, Indigenous, or People of Color, while maintaining a 50/50 balance between Greater Minnesota and metro area recipients.
Unemployment insurance changes
Several changes to unemployment insurance and compensation would be made.
The definition of reemployment assistance training would be modified by allowing more types of training — such as English as a second language, high school equivalency, or basic computer skills — to be pursued while still qualifying for unemployment insurance.
The bill would modify state law that requires 50% of the weekly equivalent of Social Security old age or disability benefit be deducted from an applicant’s weekly unemployment benefit payment if the applicant is receiving, has received, or has filed for Social Security benefits.
Contracted school workers, like bus drivers and hourly employees, who are unemployed between school terms would qualify for unemployment benefits if they otherwise meet eligibility requirements.
High school students would qualify for unemployment insurance benefits if they otherwise meet eligibility requirements. High school students are now excluded from receiving unemployment benefits.
The bill would also classify certain COVID-19-related “leaves of absence” as being involuntary, so the leave would not make an applicant ineligible for unemployment insurance benefits.
The bill includes multiple high-profile provisions aiming to provide protections to workers, including an earned sick and safe time proposal that has already passed the House.
Among the other worker-protection measures, the bill would:
In addition to a delete-all amendment sponsored by Noor, House members debated seven amendments to the bill, three of which were adopted.
Berg sponsors a bill with the same requirements, HF2284.
- Session Daily writer Tim Walker contributed to this story