Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

School districts could see 2 percent increase in general education revenue

HF843 would increase the general education basic formula allowance by 2% per year for fiscal years 2022 and 2023. House Photography file photo
HF843 would increase the general education basic formula allowance by 2% per year for fiscal years 2022 and 2023. House Photography file photo

General education revenue is the primary source of operating funds for Minnesota’s public schools and is used to pay for necessities like staff salaries and supplies. Over the years, that funding hasn’t kept pace with inflation.

In an effort to change that, HF843, would increase the general education basic formula allowance by 2 percent per year for fiscal years 2022 and 2023. It would also link future increases in the basic formula allowance to the inflation rate as measured by the Consumer Price Index.

The bill, sponsored by Rep. Zack Stephenson (DFL-Coon Rapids), was held over Wednesday by the House Education Finance Committee for possible omnibus bill inclusion. There is no Senate companion.

“If you want to have a great education system, you have to pay for it,” Stephenson said. “The problem is, in inflation-adjusted dollars, state funding for public schools is lower now that it was in 2003.”

Education Finance Committee hears HF843 02/10/21

“What the Legislature is doing now, and what the state has been doing for the last several years, has been just ignoring a simple law of economics, things cost more as time goes on, and we shouldn’t do that,” he said.

Currently, each school receives $6,567 per pupil unit. The proposed increase would raise that amount to $6,698 for fiscal year 2022 and to $6,832 for fiscal year 2023.

An increase in funding would give districts more financial stability, help provide for continuity in staffing and help districts with pandemic-related issues, Stephenson said.

Noting that inflation isn’t always predictable, Rep. Sondra Erickson (R-Princeton) cautioned against tying the basic formula allowance to it. She also asked Stephenson, “Where would you propose that we reduce spending in other areas so we could do this due diligence to K-12 education?”

Stephenson argued that education should be prioritized, and it wouldn’t necessarily mean offsets are needed in other budget areas.

“I don’t know that, that scarcity mindset is necessarily appropriate,” he said. “I also think that we have to recognize that our prosperity and quality of life in Minnesota is driven by educational investments, they are important, and we have to prioritize them.”


Related Articles


Priority Dailies

Ways and Means Committee OKs proposed $512 million supplemental budget on party-line vote
(House Photography file photo) Meeting more needs or fiscal irresponsibility is one way to sum up the differences among the two parties on a supplemental spending package a year after a $72 billion state budg...
Minnesota’s projected budget surplus balloons to $3.7 billion, but fiscal pressure still looms
(House Photography file photo) Just as Minnesota has experienced a warmer winter than usual, so has the state’s budget outlook warmed over the past few months. On Thursday, Minnesota Management and Budget...

Minnesota House on Twitter