Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Minnesota Legislature

Gas tax vs. General Fund — work is underway on bridging major differences in House, Senate transportation bills

Sen. Scott Newman, left, and Rep. Frank Hornstein confer before the beginning of the May 6 meeting of the House-Senate conference committee on HF1555, the omnibus transportation finance bill. Photo by Paul Battaglia

Minnesota’s transportation infrastructure needs more money, leaders of the DFL-led House and Republican-controlled Senate agree. Now comes the hard part: hashing out an agreement on how to make that funding boost a reality.

House and Senate negotiators on Monday began the work of reconciling their vastly different approaches to funding the state’s transportation needs, walking through their widely divergent budget proposals and hearing from the state’s top transportation official.

The sticking point at the center of the debate as the close of the legislative session draws near is a clear one: whether state lawmakers should raise taxes to provide that additional funding.

House DFLers and Gov. Tim Walz say yes — both propose increases to the state’s gas tax and various registration fees. Senate Republicans are a hard no, arguing that existing General Fund dollars can be used to boost transportation spending at a time when the state has a projected $1 billion budget surplus.

“Our disagreement lies as to the source of the money,” said Sen. Scott Newman (R-Hutchinson), who co-chairs the conference committee on HF1555, the omnibus transportation finance bill.

[MORE View a spreadsheet comparing the versions of the bill]

Conference Committee on HF1555 5/6/19

The House bill, which closely mirrors Walz’s plan and passed the House on a 74-58 vote April 29, relies on new taxes and fees to raise roughly $1.5 billion in new revenue for Minnesota’s road, bridge and public transportation infrastructure.

It would raise the state’s motor fuels tax by 20 cents per gallon over four years, increase tab and registration fees, and direct the Metropolitan Council to levy a half-cent transit-dedicated sales tax to fund new bus and light rail projects.

In all, the House version, sponsored by Rep. Frank Hornstein (DFL-Mpls), proposes to spend nearly $7.3 billion over the 2020-21 biennium.

The Senate bill, passed on a 40-27 vote May 1 and sponsored by Newman, would spend roughly $6.6 billion over that time frame. In lieu of a gas tax increase, the bill proposes to continue using $450 million from the General Fund to pay for road and bridge projects. Also absent from the Senate proposal is any new transit funding.

Margaret Anderson-Kelliher, the state’s transportation commissioner and former House speaker, told lawmakers that the Senate version of the bill “leaves many Minnesotans by the roadside” and wouldn’t make investments needed to eliminate a $6 billion maintenance backlog.

“The longer we wait to do this the more expensive it will get,” she said.

The conference committee is scheduled to meet again Wednesday at 11 a.m. The governor and legislative leaders have set a May 13 deadline for concluding conference committee work on major finance bills.


Related Articles


Priority Dailies

House, Senate pass $200 million for health care providers in fight against COVID-19
In the early hours of Tuesday, the House passed a bill to provide $200 million for health care providers in need of support to fight the COVID-19 pandemic.
Walz unveils lean supplemental budget proposal in face of virus uncertainty
When releasing his supplemental budget proposal Thursday morning, Gov. Tim Walz made sure to focus on the knowns and unknowns of the COVID-19 pandemic while tempering expectations for much else with the state’s projected surplus.
Governor proposes $2 billion bonding package for 2020
Governor pitches $2 billion plan to invest in infrastructure, public safety, higher ed, housing and other areas of need across the state.

Minnesota House on Twitter