Changing how school administrators handle student disciplinary matters is one of many considerations in this year’s omnibus E-12 education policy bill.
The House Education Innovation Policy Committee began review Tuesday of HF3315, sponsored by Rep. Sondra Erickson (R-Princeton). Amendments are expected to be offered and action taken on the bill at the committee’s Thursday meeting. The companion bill, SF3086, awaits action by the Senate E-12 Policy Committee. Sen. Eric Pratt (R-Prior Lake) is the sponsor.
The proposal to change school disciplinary policies would require administrators to intervene and redirect a student’s negative or disruptive behavior, using non-exclusionary practices, rather than turning toward suspension or expulsion.
It’s a move that several student advocacy groups and teachers are cheering, saying suspension and expulsion is often overused and ineffective at correcting student behaviors.
“Simply put, if students are in class they are learning, and if they are not, they’re not learning,” said Abbie Finger, a Minneapolis Public Schools teacher.
“Too often there is an overreliance on suspension for less serious, subjective infractions, such as disruption,” Finger said. “Suspensions are not an effective deterrent and often make students feel less engaged because we are sending the message that school is not for them.”
Alternatives to suspension — or non-exclusionary disciplinary practices — include social and emotional services, school-linked mental health services, social work services, referrals for special education, academic screening and alternative education services.
Rep. JoAnn Ward (DFL-Woodbury) was happy to see that the Legislature is emphasizing restorative practices over exclusionary practices.
“That’s a huge part of my background, and I have years of work in schools using restorative practices, so I’m just delighted to see it being embedded in schools,” she said.
When school administrators choose to dismiss a student from school, provisions in the bill would require teachers provide suspended students with the opportunity to complete all schoolwork they missed during their absence. Additionally, any student suspended more than five consecutive days would need to be provided with alternative education services, such as online learning.
In instances of expulsion, the student, parents and school district would enter into a student-withdrawal agreement that could not exceed 12 months. The school administrator would also have to prepare and enforce a readmission plan.
Education Commissioner Brenda Cassellius said that while she’s supportive of the plan, she suggests modifications to the readmission language.
“I do believe that we need some stronger language around threat assessments upon return … so there is a guarantee that students who are posing a risk to themselves or others do get some sort of follow up and support,” she said.
Advocates of non-exclusionary practices said provisions in the bill are a step in the right direction. However, Finger also encouraged lawmakers to appropriate funding for professional development to help teachers learn restorative practices and trauma-informed techniques.
“Reframing how we think about school discipline is too important to become a buzzword, and my fear is if some provisions are encouraged and not required they will join other well-meaning education narratives that didn’t fully succeed because they weren’t carried through by everyone,” she said.
Other notable provisions in the bill would:
What's in the bill?
The following are selected bills that have been incorporated in part or whole into the omnibus E-12 education policy bill:
'A very successful session?' Or, 'a debacle?' The reviews are mixed in the immediate aftermath of the 2018 session.
The latest numbers are a $517 million swing from the November forecast
The budget process explained — and why it matters