Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Legislature passes Green Acres report

Published (4/15/2011)
By Sue Hegarty
Share on: 



The House passed a conference committee report 102-27 April 11 that would revise the Green Acres and Rural Preserve programs.

Sponsored by Rep. Mike LeMieur (R-Little Falls) and Sen. Jeremy Miller (R-Winona), HF12*/ SF222 was passed 45-15 by the Senate April 14. It now heads to the governor.

In 2008, legislators created a dual tax classification system for productive (2a) and non-productive (2b) agricultural land and provided that, in the future, non-productive (2b) agricultural land would no longer be allowed in the Green Acres program. In 2009, the Legislature created a new program called Rural Preserve for non-productive (2b) land with tax benefits similar to Green Acres. In order for land to be enrolled in Rural Preserve, a farmer was required to develop a conservation plan and sign a covenant that the land would not be developed or farmed for a period of years.

As amended, the bill would no longer require farmers to develop a conservation plan or sign a covenant agreement to enroll in Rural Preserve. It would also grant farmers who removed land from the Green Acres program as a result of 2008 and 2009 changes a chance to reapply for either program this year with their respective counties by Aug. 1, 2011. After that, the annual enrollment deadline would return to May 1. Conferees said that will give counties extra time to explain the program changes to the farmers.

The bill includes a recommendation by Rep. Kurt Daudt (R-Crown) to remove a 10-acre minimum requirement to enroll in Rural Preserve (class 2b). It was replaced with a requirement that the property, of any size acreage, be contiguous to property enrolled in Green Acres (class 2a) and under the same ownership.

House conferees accepted Senate language that would require, as part of the application process, an aerial photograph or satellite image of the property enrolled. Forms would need to warn enrollees about the claw back consequences of terminating the Rural Preserve program.

Covenants that had already been signed would be terminated and no longer required. Also, interested parties would work together to explore an alternative method for determining the taxable value of enrolled agricultural land. A report would be due by Feb. 15, 2012.

Session Weekly More...


Session Weekly Home



Related Stories


From soils to consumption
Ag law helps gardeners determine what plants are suitable for state climate
(view full story) Published 5/25/2012

A green thumbs up
Ag policies seek to protect garden and landscape consumers
(view full story) Published 4/6/2012

Minnesota Index: A bushel and a peck
Facts and statistics on farming in Minnesota
(view full story) Published 2/24/2012

Good practices
Feed manufacturers ask for stopgap to forthcoming FDA rules
(view full story) Published 2/3/2012

More food inspectors
Direct sales food retailers may need handler license in some instances
(view full story) Published 4/1/2011

Minnesota Index: A Minnesota Breakfast
Facts and statistics on Minnesota's homegrown foods
(view full story) Published 3/25/2011

Learning about what you eat
Students use ‘exploding cheeseburger’ to teach agriculture
(view full story) Published 2/25/2011

At Issue: Repeal of Green Acres
The issue: ‘A farm is a farm is a farm’
(view full story) Published 2/4/2011