Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Level II offenders on web

Published (2/4/2011)
By Mike Cook
Share on: 



The public could have better access to know if a predatory offender is living in their area.

Rep. Tony Cornish (R-Good Thunder) sponsors HF151, which would add Level II offenders to a Department of Corrections’ website that lists Level III offenders.

Approved Jan. 27 by the House Public Safety and Crime Prevention Policy and Finance Committee, the bill was sent to the House Civil Law Committee. It has no Senate companion.

“I consider Level II sex offenders to be pretty serious offending folk, and there’s a pretty good chance they’ll offend again,” Cornish said.

According to the Corrections Department risk level assessment, Level III offenders are considered the most likely to reoffend, while Level II offenders are considered a moderate risk.

A full fiscal note has been requested, but according to nonpartisan House Fiscal Analysis, a preliminary fiscal note indicates a $220,000 price tag for an additional four full-time equivalent positions to monitor offenders and some software upgrades.

Bill Donnay, director for the Corrections Department Risk Assessment/Community Notification Unit, said that as of Jan. 1, 2011, there were 6,941 individuals in the state assigned a risk level: 1,066 Level III; 1,780 Level II; and 4,095 Level I. He said only about 1,100 to 1,200 Level II offenders would go on a potential website because the rest are incarcerated and a few have been civilly committed.

Teresa Nelson, legal counsel for the ACLU of Minnesota, spoke against the bill. She said the bill could violate a constitutional right of being free from after-the-fact punishment. That happened in Alaska.

“Another factor that the court noted in deciding that Internet postings were unconstitutional punishment under Alaska’s constitution is that it exposes registrants through aggressive notification of their crime to profound humiliation and community-wide ostracism, and that the practical effect of Internet dissemination is that it leaves open the possibility that the registrant will be denied employment and having opportunity,” she said.

Session Weekly More...


Session Weekly Home



Related Stories


Keeping the courts adequately funded
Public safety finance law doesn’t gut Human Rights Department
(view full story) Published 8/11/2011

Governor vetoes public safety bill
At about $1.8 billion in spending, no cuts to courts were proposed
(view full story) Published 7/15/2011

DNA - It’s all in the family
Familial DNA could help solve criminal cases, but at what cost?
(view full story) Published 4/8/2011

Creating a ‘Safe Harbor’
Wide-ranging support for bill to decriminalize juveniles exploited by prostitution
(view full story) Published 4/1/2011

Two omnibus bills merged into one
DFL legislators oppose cuts to Department of Human Rights, Civil Legal Services
(view full story) Published 4/1/2011

Safety versus savings
Home fire sprinklers would be costly, but can save lives
(view full story) Published 3/4/2011

Minnesota Index: State corrections
Figures and statistics on Minnesota's correctional system
(view full story) Published 2/25/2011

How young is too young?
Committee debates age for youth being charged as an adult in certain cases
(view full story) Published 2/18/2011