Minnesota House of Representatives

Menu

Public Information Services Menu

Juvenile delinquency hearings

Published (3/23/2012)
By Mike Cook
Share on: 



If a 16- or 17-year-old has committed a felony-level crime, the juvenile hearing is currently open to the public. The resulting records are also public, even if the charges are later reduced or dismissed.

A bill proffered by Rep. Steve Smith (R-Mound) would keep those hearings as is for adult certification and extended jurisdiction juvenile proceedings, but the standard could change for delinquency hearings.

The bill would require a court to determine that, due to the seriousness of the charge, the hearing should be open because the public safety benefits outweigh potential consequences to the child due to the resulting public record.

“This change will give judges the discretion to decide if an offense is serious or violent enough to make it public,” said Mark Haase, vice president of projects and operations for the Council on Crime and Justice.

Approved March 20 by the House Judiciary Policy and Finance Committee, HF876 was sent to the House floor.

“We’ve got 2-3,000 felony-level delinquency petitions filed every year,” Smith said. “Later, when the young people seek work, try to get their life back on track or gain employment or housing, they’ll often be denied sometimes not even knowing that it’s (because of) their juvenile record. This situation is contrary to rehabilitative services of our public juvenile system.”

Smith said there is a need to hold youths accountable so they can learn from their mistakes, but one dumb youthful transgression shouldn’t necessarily hold them back for the rest of their lives.

Assistant Hennepin County Attorney Tom Arneson, manager of the office’s Juvenile Prosecution Division, spoke against the bill at the committee’s March 13 meeting.

“Current law allows some light to be shed on the juvenile justice system. This bill creates a presumption of secrecy for an additional class of serious offenses,” he said. “Additionally, it will be difficult to have these decisions made on a case-by-case basis and will lead to disparities in treatments of these cases.”

A companion, SF602, sponsored by Sen. Michael Jungbauer (R-East Bethel), awaits action by the Senate Judiciary and Public Safety Committee.

Session Weekly More...


Session Weekly Home



Related Stories


Keeping the courts adequately funded
Public safety finance law doesn’t gut Human Rights Department
(view full story) Published 8/11/2011

Governor vetoes public safety bill
At about $1.8 billion in spending, no cuts to courts were proposed
(view full story) Published 7/15/2011

DNA - It’s all in the family
Familial DNA could help solve criminal cases, but at what cost?
(view full story) Published 4/8/2011

Creating a ‘Safe Harbor’
Wide-ranging support for bill to decriminalize juveniles exploited by prostitution
(view full story) Published 4/1/2011

Two omnibus bills merged into one
DFL legislators oppose cuts to Department of Human Rights, Civil Legal Services
(view full story) Published 4/1/2011

Safety versus savings
Home fire sprinklers would be costly, but can save lives
(view full story) Published 3/4/2011

Minnesota Index: State corrections
Figures and statistics on Minnesota's correctional system
(view full story) Published 2/25/2011

How young is too young?
Committee debates age for youth being charged as an adult in certain cases
(view full story) Published 2/18/2011

Public Information Services  ·   175 State Office Building, Saint Paul, MN 55155   ·   Public.Information@house.mn