Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Minnesota Legislature

Two views on radiation treatment

Published (3/6/2009)
By Lee Ann Schutz
Share on: 



A bill described as “a fight between two groups,” came under intense debate on the House floor March 5, with the chairs of the House health committees on opposite sides of the issue.

Rep. Paul Thissen (DFL-Mpls) and Sen. Linda Berglin (DFL-Mpls) sponsor HF177/SF162*, which would extend the current moratorium on construction of new radiation oncology facilities from 2011 to 2014 in the Twin Cities metropolitan area, and several regional centers in Greater Minnesota.

Passed by the House 90-39, it now moves to the governor’s desk. It passed the Senate 55-7 on Feb. 19.

“The Legislature has made the decision, on repeated occasions, that limiting the expansion of these machines is the right public policy for us to be pursuing,” said Thissen, who chairs the House Health Care and Human Services Policy and Oversight Committee. He pointed to information from the Minnesota Hospital Association and individual providers showing there are more radiation services available than needed, based on 2007 capacity. “This is in a large part about controlling costs,” he said.

But the chairman of the House Health Care and Human Services Finance Division has a different take on the matter and encouraged members to vote against the bill.

“What we really have is a fight between Starbucks and Caribou Coffee, and Starbucks doesn’t want Caribou to open any more shops. … It’s a fight between two good groups of radiation oncologists, both of them do a good job, but one of them wants to keep the other out of the business,” said Rep. Thomas Huntley (DFL-Duluth).

He said that one group owns their machines and leases space in hospitals. The other uses a model where the oncology professionals act as a team. Its machines could be in hospitals or in separate facilities. Huntley argued the latter provides greater access for patients.

Rep. Torrey Westrom (R-Elbow Lake) was among those calling the moratorium a cap on free enterprise. “Why should government be making decisions regarding private enterprise. “I don’t know why we want government picking winners and losers, and not letting the market doing its job.”

Session Weekly More...


Session Weekly Home



Related Stories


HHS bill is DOA but hoping for CPR
Supporters cite gaining federal funds, governor concerned about spending
(view full story) Published 5/13/2010

House passes HHS budget bill
Members reluctantly vote for cuts; governor says bill is too costly
(view full story) Published 5/6/2010

Not cutting as deep
Although painful now, omnibus HHS budget bill could set stage for reform
(view full story) Published 4/29/2010

Revisiting GAMC
Program participation questionable, hospitals favor earlier federal reform
(view full story) Published 4/22/2010

A distress call for SOS?
State Operated Services plans programmatic redesign, amidst criticism
(view full story) Published 4/22/2010

Minnesota Index: Health coverage
Figures and statistics on health coverage and other vitals
(view full story) Published 4/22/2010

Inking a deal for donors
State oversight of body arts could reduce donor deferrals
(view full story) Published 4/15/2010

Nursing a level playing field
Sides differ on who should pay for nursing home costs
(view full story) Published 4/8/2010

Saying ‘sorry’
House resolution would apologize for practices done decades ago
(view full story) Published 3/25/2010

And the cupboard is bare
More Minnesotans struggle to put food on the table
(view full story) Published 2/25/2010

Future of GAMC uncertain
Legislators consider health care for state’s poor, sick
(view full story) Published 2/11/2010

At Issue: Health care law quagmire
Sustainability at issue in law line-item vetoed by governor
(view full story) Published 5/29/2009

At Issue: More compromise, more reductions
Cuts in health and human services finance bill called ‘painful’
(view full story) Published 5/15/2009

At Issue: Cuts hang in the balance
Much depends on tax increases
(view full story) Published 5/1/2009

At Issue: Providing ‘pretty darn good coverage’
A new approach to public health could save millions in benefits, advocates say
(view full story) Published 4/10/2009

First Reading: Complex problem, complex solution
Cuts to health and human services could create reform opportunity
(view full story) Published 4/3/2009

Minnesota Index: Health boards
Figures and statistics on health licensing board in Minnesota
(view full story) Published 3/13/2009

At Issue: Medical marijuana
Controversial treatment clears first committee hurdle
(view full story) Published 2/20/2009

Minnesota Index: Less lighting up
Figures and statistics on smoking in Minnesota
(view full story) Published 2/20/2009