Money for farmer-led councils that could prompt more buy-in to the state’s buffer program is included in the omnibus agriculture finance bill passed by the House 134-0 Wednesday.
Sponsored by Rep. Rod Hamilton (R-Mountain Lake), HF895/SF780* would appropriate more than $118 million in General Fund spending during the upcoming biennium to fund the Department of Agriculture, Board of Animal Health and Agricultural Utilization Research Institute.
As debate began, Hamilton successfully offered a delete-all amendment to insert the language of HF895.
The bill will now travel back to the Senate where Sen. Torrey Westrom (R-Elbow Lake) is the sponsor. It was passed 42-25 by that body March 30. A conference committee is expected to work out the differences.
After a brief outline of the bill’s contents, Hamilton’s request to fellow members was equally succinct.
“Friends, I would simply ask for your support,” he said.
While offering praise for the bill, and for Hamilton’s work, Rep. Jeanne Poppe (DFL-Austin) said the legislation could have been better with increases in funding for several programs and for the Department of Agriculture.
WATCH Full video of House Floor debate and passage of the omnibus agriculture finance bill
During committee hearings, agency officials expressed concern about funding in areas such as plant pathogens and pollinator decline, as well as increased operating costs that could impact their delivery of services.
However, Poppe ended her remarks by noting the bipartisan work that had been done and once again praising the result.
“Today, as we showcase the importance of agriculture, the members of Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party stand with our colleagues across the aisle in support of a good bill,” Poppe said.
Farmer councils
The appropriations include $1.5 million for grants to the farmer-led councils, which would work to develop best management practices and prioritized lists of projects to help improve water quality. By giving agricultural producers a louder voice in the process, proponents hope there will also be more buy-in as deadlines to implement buffers, or alternative water-quality practices, draw closer.
The funding would primarily be used to hire coordinators who would work with the councils to help farmers identify and take advantage of all the state resources and private help available. The groups may also help farmers create more customized solutions for individual situations.
Safety group established
The bill also includes language that would formally establish a Farm Safety Working Group. The 16-member organization would consist of government, agriculture and citizen members who would advise the department and Legislature on farm safety issues and coordinate improvement efforts.
What else would HF895 do?
The bill also includes measures that would: