Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Legislative News and Views - Rep. Chris Swedzinski (R)

Back to profile

Swedzinski: Session ends with tax relief, public safety still on table

Tuesday, May 24, 2022


ST. PAUL – The Legislature adjourned Monday with priorities such as converting a massive state surplus to historic tax relief and improving public safety at a time violent crime is soaring unresolved.  

State Rep. Chris Swedzinski, R-Ghent, said House Democrats’ insistence on increasing government spending by billions of dollars bogged down tax relief. Senate Republicans proposed more than $8 billion in tax relief, while House Democrats were looking to spend $21 for every $1 in tax cuts.  

“Tax relief should have been a tap-in this session,” Swedzinski said. “People are getting crushed by price increases at every turn, yet the state has a massive surplus so we were in position to help the people out with permanent, meaningful relief. Instead, House Democrats were so bent on increasing government spending by 15 percent or more compared with the last budget, that they held tax relief hostage to the end. It is just good that, earlier this month, legislation was passed to repay Minnesota’s unemployment insurance trust fund deficit and reverse that needless tax hike on employers.” 

Swedzinski also said House Democrats refused to fund law enforcement and blocked increased penalties for criminals – including a bill that would crack down on fentanyl as our country deals with record-setting overdose deaths driven by this deadly drug.

“Public safety is government’s top responsibility and it is a shame that House Democrats are unwilling to take this issue seriously as violent crime runs rampant,” Swedzinski said. “Instead of doing more to support local law enforcement, they continue pushing to spend more tax dollars on unproven and unaccountable non-profit groups.” 

Gov. Tim Walz could call a special session in the coming weeks to address this session’s unfinished business. For that to happen, firm agreement on the finished product would need to be in hand, Swedzinski said.

“The big question is whether we actually need a special session,” Swedzinski said. “The state already is fully funded for the biennium and, in all likelihood, a special session would result in billions of dollars that could be used for tax cuts being spent on government programs. If that’s the case, as disappointing as it may be, I’d rather wait until January when a new Legislature can focus on delivering real tax relief instead of settling for less now just to pat each other on the back for coming through a day late and many dollars short.

“I’m also concerned about local projects that aren’t being funded because a capital investment bill was left undone. We fought hard to make sure they were included in this year’s bonding bill and those, too, may have to wait because House Democrats didn’t bring that bill to the floor.”