An extensive package of infrastructure investments, policy provisions, and some tax increases that have already proven controversial, form the omnibus transportation finance bill, which was introduced on Tuesday as a delete-all amendment to HF1684.
Sponsored by Rep. Frank Hornstein (DFL-Mpls), the bill is due to take its final shape and receive an up-or-down vote tomorrow by the House Transportation Finance and Policy Committee, but members continued their work during another meeting Wednesday.
The largest agency appropriations for the 2022-23 biennium in the House bill are $6.25 billion to the Department of Transportation; $491.39 million to the Department of Public Safety; and $178.81 million to the Metropolitan Council.
There is also $400 million in trunk highway bonding proposed in fiscal year 2024, of which $225 million would go to state road construction and $175 million to the Corridors of Commerce program.
The bill would result in a $39.6 million increase in General Fund spending over the current base level.
Hornstein said this year’s omnibus transportation bill needs to address four major areas:
He believes progress is made in each and said, despite his support for “a steep increase in gas taxes,” that is not included in the bill, though there is an “inflation adjustment.”
Nor is there an attempt to “claw back” General Fund money previously appropriated to the Highway User Tax Distribution Fund.
“I understand those are two issues of great concern to the other side of the aisle, and that’s why they’re not in here,” Hornstein said during Tuesday’s hearing. “I hope the other side can reach out to us and accept some of the things you may have a problem with so we can move forward.”
The bill would raise some tax rates, including the adjustment Hornstein referenced. That proposal would direct the Department of Revenue to index the motor fuels tax to inflation using the National Highway Construction Cost Index, a change estimated to add 1.2 cents to the cost of a gallon of gas each of the next two years.
Another provision would add a 4% “luxury vehicle surcharge” to the motor vehicle sales tax. It would only be levied if the sales price is more the double the annual average sales price of vehicles in three different classifications: automobiles, non-commercial 1-ton pickup trucks and recreational vehicles.
A 0.5% increase to the transit sales tax in the Twin Cities metropolitan area is also proposed. All told, it is estimated the bill would raise more than $627 million during the biennium.
“Instead we should be leveraging and prioritizing the surplus dollars and future federal dollars in providing improvements to our transportation infrastructure,” Petersburg said.
Another provision would allow people without proof of legal presence in the U.S. to obtain a driver’s license or Minnesota identification card, a controversial change supporters say would allow more Minnesotans to drive legally, buy auto insurance and get to and from work more easily, but opponents say would incentivize more illegal immigration.
Some of the bill’s highest profile funding proposals include:
Some of the bill’s policy proposals include:
What’s in the bill?
The following are some bills that have been partially or fully incorporated into the omnibus transportation finance bill: