The issue of class sizes, testing frequency and student-to-staff ratios are areas that teacher union bargaining units would like to have more control over.
The bill was approved 11-7, on a party-line vote, Monday by the House Education Policy Committee. It now heads to the House Labor, Industry, Veterans and Military Affairs Finance and Policy Committee. There is no Senate companion.
Among its provisions, the bill would:
Proponents, including Peter Eckhoff, president of the Robbinsdale Federation of Teachers, say they want more of a say in their students’ learning conditions and the future of their profession, and that this proposal offers that.
“We educators do value far more than our compensation and we want more opportunity to have greater input and control in our learning environments and our work settings,” Eckhoff said. “We believe that we, as the experts in student instruction, should also have greater opportunity to bargain over more elements or our teaching environments.”
Opponents say the proposal would deprive districts of the flexibility needed to respond to fluctuations in student enrollment. If class sizes and personnel ratios are predetermined by contract, school boards could struggle to maintain fiscal stability, according to Deb Henton, executive director of the Minnesota Association of School Administrators. Henton spoke on behalf of a number of organizations.
“If a district has declining enrollment leading to a loss of revenue, but must maintain a specific personnel ratio or class size – given what has been negotiated in a contract – the district may need to lay off much needed support staff like counselors, nurses and mental health staff,” she said.
Rep. Sondra Erickson (R-Princeton) unsuccessfully offered eight amendments that, when combined, would have nullified the proposal and prohibited teacher strikes.