Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Minnesota Legislature

More than $1 million sought in attorney fees for court case the state lost

Multiple wins in lower courts meant nothing after the country’s highest court ruled last summer against a more than 100 year old state law.

That decision also cost the state more than a million bucks.

In June 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court determined in Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky that state law prohibiting certain types of political apparel in a polling place on Election Day is unconstitutional. The law has been on the books since 1913.

Dan Rogan, Civil Division manager at the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office, said that under federal law, plaintiffs are entitled to reasonable attorney fees if they win a civil rights challenge, such as one involving the First Amendment.

Sponsored by Rep. Raymond Dehn (DFL-Mpls), HF1428 would provide $1.3 million in the current fiscal year to cover those.

Approved Tuesday by the House State Government Finance Division, the bill’s next stop is the House Ways and Means Committee. Its companion, SF1917, awaits action by the Senate State Government Finance and Policy and Elections Committee. Sen. Mary Kiffmeyer (R-Big Lake), a former secretary of state, is the Senate sponsor.

Total money awarded the plaintiffs by various levels of courts is about $1.25 million. Interest has raised the total to about $1.29 million, Rogan said.

Secretary of State Steve Simon said if the amount allotted to meet the requirement is too much, the excess would revert back to the General Fund.

Rogan said the question before the court was if government has the right to regulate free speech inside a polling place and, if so, to what extent.

“Ultimately, the court, on a 7-2 decision, ruled that Minnesota’s law was unconstitutional,” he said. “The court concluded that while it was reasonable to prohibit some forms of advocacy in the polling place … it did determine that Minnesota’s prohibition on political material was not reasonable.”

Rep. Jerry Hertaus (R-Greenfield) suggested the requested money come from the secretary of state’s office budget.

“This is a case where the state of Minnesota was the defendant,” Simon said.


Related Articles

Priority Dailies

Rep. Diane Loeffler passes away
Rep. Diane Loeffler (DFL-Mpls) passed away Saturday. An email from House Speaker Melissa Hortman (DFL-Brooklyn Park), said that Loeffler, serving her eighth term in the...
State Fair poll shows steady support for gun sale background checks, recreational marijuana
Support for criminal background checks on all gun sales and the legalization of marijuana for recreational use appears to have remained steady among Minnesotans during the past 12 months.
Governor signs special session budget bills into law
One week after a marathon special session that saw lawmakers pass most of the major budget bills needed to fund the state’s government over the next two years, Gov. Tim Walz signed the legislation into law.
After sunrise, the sun sets on 2019 special session
It took a grueling special session that stretched past sunrise, but Minnesota lawmakers completed their work early Saturday morning on passing a new two-year state budget.

Minnesota House on Twitter