Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Conservator offered some anonymity

Published (3/16/2012)
By Lee Ann Schutz
Share on: 



Appointment of a conservator to administer an estate can create a volatile family situation, so much so that some have actually been shot.

“A guardian can be looked at as an evil-doer,” Rep. Joe Mullery (DFL-Mpls) told the House Civil Law Committee March 12. He sponsors HF2505, which would afford some protection for those who professionally take on the guardianship role. “If they are going to be subjecting their lives to danger,” fewer will be willing to take on the role,” he said.

The bill would allow a conservator the option to use a post office box number as their means of contact in the annual report.

It was approved and sent to the House Judiciary Policy and Finance Committee. It has no Senate companion.

— L. Schutz



Liability limit for nonprofit events

When a nonprofit organization hosts an event on public land or waters, they are required to have liability coverage. The policy cost depends on the amount needed.

A new law, signed by Gov. Mark Dayton on March 15, will cap the total liability of the state or a municipality at $1 million, rather than $1.5 million.

Dill said the law will provide that the total liability of the state or a municipality may not exceed $1 million in total if the claims involve nonprofit corporations engaged in or administering outdoor recreational activities funded or operating under a government-issued permit. He said it will make it easier for an organization to purchase needed insurance for events, such as ice-fishing contests.

Rep. David Dill (R-Crane Lake) and Sen. Julianne Ortman (R-Chanhassen) are the sponsors. The law is effective March 16.

HF32/ SF1183*/CH131

Session Weekly More...


Session Weekly Home



Related Stories


Minnesota Index: Child support
Facts and statistics on child support in Minnesota
(view full story) Published 3/23/2012

Leveling the playing field, but for whom?
Tort reform needed for businesses, but others say at the consumer’s expense
(view full story) Published 2/3/2012