Mandated conservation rate structures for public water suppliers could evaporate.
Sponsored by Rep. Tim O'Driscoll (R-Sartell),
HF1923 would eliminate a 2008 law that requires water suppliers to more than 1,000 people adopt conservation rate pricing to encourage conservation through block rates, seasonal rates and excess use rates.
The bill was approved March 6 by the House Environment, Energy and Natural Resources Policy and Finance Committee. The bill now advances to the full House.
Rather than mandating conservation rate structures, the bill would mandate public water suppliers to encourage voluntary water conservation measures. Water utilities would need to put “demand reduction measures” in place by Jan. 1, 2015.
“Conservation still exists, but you have another option,” said Craig Johnson, intergovernmental relations representative for the League of Minnesota Cities.
The bill faced opposition from committee DFLers, who contend that it weakens water conservation efforts when drought conditions exist in much of the state.
Sen. John Pederson (R-St. Cloud) sponsors the companion bill,
SF1560. It was laid over Jan. 31 for possible inclusion in an omnibus bill by the Senate Environment and Natural Resources Committee.
Minnesota Index: Enjoying the outdoors
Facts and statistics on state parks and trails
(view full story)
Published 4/20/2012
Minnesota Index: Birding
Facts and statistics on birding in Minnesota
(view full story)
Published 4/6/2012
A prickly situation
Farmers seek fair fight against noxious weeds
(view full story)
Published 3/16/2012
Angling for more participation
DNR looks for ways to get more anglers and hunters into the great outdoors
(view full story)
Published 3/2/2012
Meeting halfway
Environment and energy law packs policy changes
(view full story)
Published 8/11/2011
Legacy bill brought back to life
More than $449 million appropriated from voter-approved sales tax increase
(view full story)
Published 8/11/2011
Trees from start to finish
Environment finance bill would close tree nursery
(view full story)
Published 5/20/2011
Legacy spending differences
Conference committee needed to determine parks and trails funding
(view full story)
Published 5/20/2011
Less means more
Some Legacy recipients may see increases despite drop in appropriation percentages
(view full story)
Published 4/29/2011
Minnesota Index: Outdoor Heritage Fund
Facts and statistics on the Outdoor Heritage Fund
(view full story)
Published 4/29/2011
Environment bill reflects ‘priorities’
House addresses wild rice, harvesting timber and closing of state parks
(view full story)
Published 4/1/2011
Putting a stop to aquatic invasive species
Broader enforcement, stiffer penalties proposed for violators
(view full story)
Published 4/1/2011
Wild rice study proposed
Committee approves policies for wild rice, state parks
(view full story)
Published 3/25/2011
Should Minnesotans be hunting for land?
Legislators aim for no-net-loss and no-net-gain targets
(view full story)
Published 3/4/2011
Minnesota Index: Horticulture and agriculture
Figures and statistics on horticulture and agriculture in Minnesota
(view full story)
Published 3/4/2011
At Issue: Leaving a legacy
Recipients report outcomes of dedicated tax appropriations
(view full story)
Published 2/4/2011