Candidates for office could serve as election judges in precincts where they’re not on the ballot, under a bill that won committee approval.
Rep. Kate Knuth (DFL-New Brighton) sponsors
HF591 on behalf of a constituent named Walt Witzke. He ran for the New Brighton City Council in 2009 and was told he could not serve as an election judge in St. Paul because he was running for office.
Knuth said the Office of the Secretary of State already interpreted state law to say that candidates could serve as judges in precincts other than where they’re running for office, and that the bill would merely clarify the statute.
“We’re really trying to clarify this and make it more straightforward so it’s not interpreted differently in different parts of the state,” Knuth said.
The House Government Operations and Elections Committee approved the bill Feb. 23 and sent it to the House floor. There is no Senate companion.
Beth Fraser, director of governmental affairs for the office, said nothing in the bill would prohibit election officials from screening election judge applicants based on other objective criteria.
“This is our interpretation of current statute, and we’re comfortable with this clarification,” she said.
Voters to decide on photo ID
Fate of constitutional question now rests in the people’s hands
(view full story)
Published 4/6/2012
Proving who you say you are
House votes to approve ballot question on photo ID for voters
(view full story)
Published 3/23/2012
Where the people are
Population growth varies across state but has big redistricting impact
(view full story)
Published 5/6/2011
Drawing the lines
Redistricting plan is far from bipartisan acceptance
(view full story)
Published 5/6/2011
First Reading: Identification, please?
Lawmakers weigh photo ID requirement for voters
(view full story)
Published 2/11/2011
At Issue: A push here, a bubble there
State redistricting is a balancing act that’s not often easy
(view full story)
Published 1/21/2011