Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Expanding ex parte protection area

Published (2/25/2010)
By Mike Cook
Share on: 



An ex parte order for protection provides a certain level of immediate protection for a domestic abuse victim.

However, it could get even more specific.

Sponsored by Rep. Debra Hilstrom (DFL-Brooklyn Center), HF2608 would allow courts to provide a reasonable area surrounding a dwelling or a residence in an ex parte order.

This tries to get at people who have no reason to be there, she said.

Approved Feb. 19 by the House Crime Victims/Criminal Records Division, and Feb. 25 by the House Public Safety Policy and Oversight Committee, it awaits action by the full House. A companion, SF2437, sponsored by Sen. Mee Moua (DFL-St. Paul), awaits action by the Senate Judiciary Committee.

According to state statute, if a victim “alleges an immediate and present danger of domestic abuse, the court may grant an ex parte order for protection and granting relief as the court deems proper.” The order can force the offender to stay away from a victim’s residence and workplace and permit no contact between the alleged abuser and their victim.

Vanessa Foster, a legal advocate at Tubman, which offers services and shelter to domestic violence victims, said that when boundaries are not clearly stated, abusers often stretch an order’s limit to harass or intimidate their victims. She said a recent client had her abuser loitering three doors down from her home. “The police could not protect her until he entered her home or threatened to actually hurt her,” Foster said.

“Under current Minnesota law, courts can exclude respondents in orders for protection from a reasonable area surrounding the dwelling or residence of the applicant for the order,” said Matthew Frank, an assistant attorney general. “This provision includes or adds that same language to the ex parte provision that an applicant can apply for from the court.”

What constitutes a reasonable area?

Although nothing is set in stone, Frank said, “Typically, what courts do is define that in terms of geographic area, within a block or two blocks, or within 100 feet or within certain areas the respondent would recognize.”

Session Weekly More...


Session Weekly Home



Related Stories


Turn your key and breathe
House approves ignition interlock bill that would let DWI offenders drive sooner
(view full story) Published 4/29/2010

Minnesota Index: Crime and punishment
Figures and statistics on crime in Minnesota.
(view full story) Published 3/18/2010

Red River Basin: ‘Here we go again’
Flood-prone communities look to keep their heads above water
(view full story) Published 3/4/2010

At Issue: Courts and corrections backing
Public safety finance bill awaits gubernatorial action
(view full story) Published 5/15/2009

At Issue: Corrections, courts funding concerns
Omnibus public safety finance bill gets mixed reaction from House
(view full story) Published 5/1/2009

At Issue: Sex offenders, courts and corrections
Omnibus public safety policy bill headed to conference committee
(view full story) Published 4/24/2009

At Issue: Helping to find missing adults
House vote expected soon on ‘Brandon’s Law’
(view full story) Published 4/17/2009

Minnesota Index: Keeping Minnesotans safe
Figures and statistics on the state patrol and fire marshals in Minnesota
(view full story) Published 3/20/2009

Minnesota Index: See you in court
Figures and statistics on Minnesota's court system
(view full story) Published 2/27/2009

Minnesota Index: 'The Graybar Hotel'
Figures and statistics on Minnesota's prison population
(view full story) Published 1/16/2009