Minnesota House of Representatives
Public Information Services

Menu

Public Information Services Menu

Legislature takes aim at lead shot ban

By Jonathan Mohr
Pat O’Boyle, right, and his grandson, Max Rabidue, testify before the House Mining and Outdoor Recreation Policy Committee March 16 on HF3209, a bill that would prohibit adoption of rules limiting use of lead shot. Photo by Andrew VonBank

A Department of Natural Resources proposal that would ban the use of lead shot on wildlife management areas in certain parts of the state was met with a bill Wednesday that would shoot it down.

Chair of the House Mining and Outdoor Recreation Policy Committee, Rep. Tom Hackbarth (R-Cedar), sponsors HF3209, which would prohibit the DNR from adopting rules that further restrict the use of lead shot.

Discussion of HF3209 in House Mining and Outdoor Recreation Policy Committee

Hackbarth said such a ban had been attempted in the past but had failed in the Legislature, and he viewed using the rulemaking process to enact the ban as a way to circumvent lawmakers.

“I think that’s a little offensive, actually,” Hackbarth said. “I think this has to go through the Legislature.”

The DNR proposal would require the use of nontoxic shot when hunting small game on certain wildlife management areas in farmland sections of the state, or when hunting rails or common snipe.

Assistant Commissioner Bob Meier told the committee the lead shot ban is part of an effort to properly manage these areas over the long-term for public hunting and control the accumulation of lead on them.

“These are the crown jewels within our hunting system that are going to be there forever,” Meier said. “When our children’s, children’s, children are there, what will those fields and WMAs look like?”

A number of testifiers spoke both for and against the bill, which was approved on an 11-3 roll-call vote and referred to the House Government Operations and Elections Policy Committee. There is no Senate companion.

Most agreed lead is harmful, but several supporters of the bill said scientific evidence does not show lead shot harms entire wildlife populations. They also argued the ban would make hunting more expensive, and some thought it could open the door to further regulation of hunting in the future.

Opponents of the bill, several of whom were hunters themselves, said the ban was needed to help limit the impact of a dangerous element from the ecosystem – in the same way lead paint and lead batteries are being removed.  

Search Session Daily

Recent Dailies

Week in Review: Jan. 17-20

The third week of the 2017 session wrapped up Thursday night with passage of a health insurance p...

House passes $315 million health insurance relief package

A $300 million insurance premium relief package passed the House Thursday, despite Democrats’ obj...

Officer training requirements, funding concerns shared with House panel

Minnesota has 10,722 active, licensed peace officers across 437 law enforcement agencies that ran...

Prizes for campaign cash? Bill would OK candidate fundraising raffles

Rep. Jim Newberger (R-Becker) first heard about candidate campaign raffles at a conference in Was...

Buffer controversy grows once again at Capitol

Despite years of work and two major pieces of legislation, the issue of buffering public waters t...

Perpich Center facing major problems, legislative auditor says

The Perpich Center for Arts Education and accompanying Crosswinds Arts and Science School face th...

Retailers seek allowance for being ‘state’s sales tax partner’

Deborah Everson co-owns Everson’s Hardware Hank in Waconia. Along with most other retailers, she ...

With Greater Minnesota beset by child care crisis, lawmakers seek fixes

It’s getting harder and harder to find child care in Greater Minnesota, and that’s not only affec...

Higher ed committee reviews college career readiness offerings

After graduating high school most students just want to follow their dreams, wherever they may le...

Committee offers hopeful talk about tax relief on Social Security payments

Providing seniors with relief from having their Social Security payments taxed by the state is a ...

Public Information Services  ·   175 State Office Building, Saint Paul, MN 55155   ·   Public.Information@house.mn