Minnesota House of Representatives
Public Information Services

Menu

Public Information Services Menu

After decade-long family feud, reformers unite for fraying families

By Chris Steller
Troy Bonkowske testifies before the House Civil Law and Data Practices Committee Feb. 10 about concerns to a bill sponsored by Rep. Peggy Scott, right, that would modify best interests standards in custody or parenting time proceedings. Photo by Andrew VonBank

For a decade at the House, discourse on reforming state law to help fraying families in Minnesota bore a strong resemblance to a particularly ferocious family fight.

Antagonisms between some House members on either side of the issue were palpable in elevators; conflict erupted in caucus; and battles spilled onto the House Floor. Maintaining collegiality was a stretch. “People did not get along,” recalled Rep. Tim Mahoney (DFL-St. Paul). “We typically said ‘hi’ in a high-tension voice.”

The rancor came to a head in May 2012, when Gov. Mark Dayton vetoed a family law reform bill sponsored by Rep. Peggy Scott (R-Andover). In his veto letter, Dayton urged “dialogue and hopefully, collaboration among legislators of both parties and the various stakeholders.”

Rep. Tim Mahoney

“The governor said, go talk to each other. I didn’t have high hopes to talk to some people,” Mahoney told the House Civil Law and Data Practices Committee last week. “For 10 years people had been at each other’s throats.”

But two years of trying produced a kind of truce and a cessation of hostilities, through the work of an ad hoc Child Custody Dialogue Group, including Scott, Mahoney, Rep. Carolyn Laine (DFL-Columbia Heights), Rep. Kim Norton (DFL-Rochester) and a long list of interested parties, from matrimonial attorneys and family court referees to advocates for domestic violence prevention and fathers’ rights.

Laine had agreed with the governor’s veto. The other three House members had not. When they stood together at a press conference last month to announce a package of reform legislation they and the Dialogue Group had agreed to, Center for Parental Responsibility Executive Director Molly Olson expressed amazement, echoing an observation by Norton that “the two sides have been polar opposites for so long. Collaboration is tremendous progress.”

Building Trust

Rep. Peggy Scott

The group gathered on about a half-dozen occasions for full, face-to-face meetings between January 2013 and December 2014. But in between came phone meetings, homework assignments, and subgroups on the family court process, child support, children’s best interest and cultural change “It was an enormously time consuming project for most of the people in the group,” Olson said.

Mahoney said most people who had been involved in family law issues at the Capitol over the last decade were represented by or associated with an organization or individual in the group. “Did that get everybody? No,” he said. “We had 90 percent of the people who were concerned at the table.”

They strove for consensus. If a group member found a particular issue “abhorrent,” Mahoney said, “we tried to figure out where we could agree. If we couldn’t agree, it was kept out.”

Clarity through wordsmithing

One aim of the group was greater clarity in existing family law. That meant “a lot of wordsmithing,” according to Scott. In some cases, the group couldn’t come to consensus on change beyond tweaking language to clarify current law. Elsewhere the group settled on making the state’s recognition-of-parentage form state clearly, in large print, that the form doesn’t establish parental rights.

Even simple clarifications are important, Olson said: The more vague the statutes are, the less consistently judges are able to apply them and the more frustrated families become with the system.

Changing the child support ‘cliff’ to a ‘slope’

Another area of focus was changing child support statutes, including a system of counting each overnight over two years when computing the amount of parental custody – a change dubbed a “slope” instead of the long-used “cliff.”

Rep. Carolyn Laine

“I think I’m the textbook example with what’s wrong with the current law,” said Jonathan Kerr, who told the civil law committee he was divorced in 2008. Kerr described the “cliff” in his payments -- a $1,000 difference in his child support amount because the percentage of time he had custody was a few percentage points under a 45 percent level dictated by statute. “We’ve been to the Court of Appeals three times over our case. It’s completely destroyed our relationship. It’s just awful.”

Kerr repeated a refrain heard from nearly everyone involved or affected: The bills aren’t everything he wanted but they are big step forward. “I’ve been asking for this for several years now and I’m very happy to finally see this,” he said.

Providing for the best interest of the children

A highlight of the reform package is an overhaul of the state’s criteria for what constitutes the best interests of a child in a divorce or separation.

Rep. Kim Norton

Sponsored by Scott, HF465 would make significant changes to the 17 criteria in the current statute. The dozen criteria she proposes instead include a recognition of “the benefit to the child in maximizing parenting time with both parents and the detriment to the child in limiting parenting time with either parent.”

But the bill would also do away with a best-interest criterion that parent advocates like Olson will miss:  “the wishes of the child’s parent or parents as to custody.” The group agreed, Olson said, that the door could remain open to returning that to state law in another statute – and in another year.

Other bills in the package include HF446 and HF464 (sponsored by Mahoney), HF451 (sponsored by Laine), HF512 (sponsored by Norton) and HF518 (sponsored by Scott). The Dialogue Group agreed that the bills’ sponsors should try to get the bills approved with at most technical amendments. More significant changes would require a return trip to the Dialogue Group.

At the heart of all the changes, Scott said, is a focus on what is best for the child, as well as the value each parent can have in the child’s life – at every turn including safeguards to ensure that domestic violence or other threats are absent.

Parents testifying before the civil law committee, which Scott chairs, said it would mean a sea change from what they’ve experienced.

Troy Bronkowske, divorced five years, testified before the committee Tuesday. “I was told I was a consideration. Not a father, a consideration. And that’s the way I’ve been treated by the courts and the statutes that exist.”

Wrapping it up into an omnibus bill

The sponsor’s plan is to wrap the separate bills into an omnibus bill, which Mahoney is confident Dayton would sign should it reach his desk.

“We met his requirement. I don’t expect him to veto,” Mahoney said.

For Mahoney himself, that would mark the end of a dozen long years of work on family law reform.

“I’m done,” he said. “It’s a very emotional issue. I’ve carried substantial legislation and never lost sleep over it. I have lost sleep over family law issues.”

Search Session Daily

Recent Dailies

'Starting Line': Should states elect the president by popular vote?

According to the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration, there have been five instance...

Special tax district proposed as way to pay transit line operations

A plan put forward by the chair of the House Transportation and Regional Governance Policy Commit...

Funding plan to reimburse lost property tax revenue moves forward

A new funding system supporters say would more fairly compensate counties for property tax revenu...

Eliminating ‘unnecessary’ reporting requirement would help farmers

Farmers who hold agricultural land in revocable trusts would no longer have to file, under threat...

Free burial for veterans’ spouses could disrupt VA revenue

For Minnesota’s veterans, interment options come with limited to no cost. Veterans cemeteries in ...

Minnesota Index: Special elections

Legislative special elections since statehood        163                 House   61      ...

Week in Review: Feb. 20-24

The House began the week with good spirits, passing a bill to approve off-sale Sunday liquor sale...

Wetlands bill passes removing construction roadblocks

The red light holding up a number of county road construction projects may turn green after the H...

Bill to bar state contractors from boycotting Israel passes House

Companies that discriminate against Israel would have to find another state to do business with u...

House OKs Real ID

Skies could get friendlier for Minnesotans seeking to board future flights on commercial aircraft...

State employee incentive program needs oversight, lawmakers say

The state budget office has spent $4.7 million since 2014 on a state employee incentive program i...

Not enough training sites for future medical professionals

You want medical professionals to have some experience before you go to see them with a health co...

Harassment restraining order delivery changes proposed

One of the biggest problems law enforcement personnel face with harassment restraining orders is ...

Volkswagen settlement funds create clash of ideas

Federal settlement money could mean new school buses for districts in Minnesota, but some have co...

Environment committee wades into groundwater permitting changes

Lawmakers waded into the often controversial issues of water use and regulation in rural Minnesot...

Advocates call for more support for foster, adoptive families

When the Martindale family adopted a 6-year-old boy with fetal alcohol syndrome spectrum disorder...

Legislators elect four to University of Minnesota Board of Regents

A vote by the Legislature Wednesday filled the University of Minnesota’s four vacant Board of Reg...

Canterbury Park hoping for ‘lights on’ funding

When DFL Gov. Mark Dayton and Republican lawmakers couldn’t agree on state spending terms in 2011...

A weighty question: bigger trucks on the road good or bad?

It is a debate that has become an annual rite amongst Minnesota’s transportation lawmakers: shoul...

Life insurance ‘the way it should be’ – not for terrorists

Before Syed Farook went on a shooting rampage in San Bernardino, Calif., in December 2015 and kil...

Grants could expand mental health care for children at schools

Providing mental health care for children at their schools not only simplifies transportation for...

Governor’s tax bill calls for $79 million in changes

Many provisions in the 2016 omnibus tax bill have resurfaced in HF893, Gov. Mark Dayton’s new tax...

Bill would give child care red tape a tug

Life could get easier for parents who juggle changing work schedules, children who cope with shif...

Protest on a freeway? Public safety committee approves tougher penalties

Aiming to ensure legal protests is one goal of a couple bills that others view as stifling free s...

Seeds planted for ag teacher grants program

If agriculture is a year-round occupation, then agriculture education should keep the same schedu...

Public Information Services  ·   175 State Office Building, Saint Paul, MN 55155   ·   Public.Information@house.mn