Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Committee says MMB ‘ignored’ law meant to reward employees

Rep. Jim Nash raises questions during the House State Government Finance Committee hearing on the Legislative Auditor’s Special Report on the Employee Gainsharing Program Feb. 22. Photo by Paul Battaglia
Rep. Jim Nash raises questions during the House State Government Finance Committee hearing on the Legislative Auditor’s Special Report on the Employee Gainsharing Program Feb. 22. Photo by Paul Battaglia

Minnesota Management and Budget hasn’t taken any steps to implement a program that rewards state employees for saving the state money, even though it’s been required by law since 2011.

That’s according to the Office of the Legislative Auditor, which published a review of the Employee Gainsharing Program on Jan. 28, after lawmakers raised questions about the program during the 2017 legislative session.

OLA officials discussed the findings of that report with the House State Government Finance Committee Thursday.

The law requires MMB to implement a gainsharing program that rewards state employees who identify cost-saving improvements in state government with a one-time financial award of up to 10 percent of the first year’s savings, with a cap of $50,000.

However, Joel Alter, the OLA’s director of Special Reviews, said MMB hasn’t done anything to implement the program, despite having seven years to do so.

Frustrated committee members pressed Deputy Commissioner Eric Hallstrom for answers, with Rep. Jim Nash (R-Waconia) asking if there is a reason why MMB “essentially ignored the law.”

Hallstrom disagreed with Nash’s characterization, saying his agency has been working on a path forward, but a lack of funding from the Legislature, and language in the law, has made the gainsharing program “unworkable” and “challenging” to implement. 

“How long of a runway do you need to comply with the law,” Nash asked, later saying he’s “frustrated that a law passed in 2011” is taking “forever” to implement.

Legislative Auditor James Nobles, said he can’t remember a time that a law wasn’t implemented, noting there have been a lot of cases where departments struggled to do so, but they moved forward.

“That’s what’s missing here,” Nobles added.

 

MMB’s ‘achievement awards’ program also questioned

Hallstrom also testified that MMB’s “achievement awards” program, which has paid out $11 million in employee bonuses from 2012-17, met the standards laid out in the gainsharing law before the law was changed in 2017.

Committee members vehemently disagreed, with chair Rep. Sarah Anderson (R-Plymouth) pointing out the cost-saving provision in the gainsharing statute has been in place since 2011.

Members requested more information about how employees were awarded bonuses through the achievement awards program to see if money was misused in any way. Hallstrom agreed to get the committee that information.

The meeting adjourned after nearly two hours without any solid conclusions, except hopes from some members that MMB would move forward with implementing the gainsharing program so they wouldn’t have to meet on the issue again.


Related Articles


Priority Dailies

Ways and Means Committee OKs proposed $512 million supplemental budget on party-line vote
(House Photography file photo) Meeting more needs or fiscal irresponsibility is one way to sum up the differences among the two parties on a supplemental spending package a year after a $72 billion state budg...
Minnesota’s projected budget surplus balloons to $3.7 billion, but fiscal pressure still looms
(House Photography file photo) Just as Minnesota has experienced a warmer winter than usual, so has the state’s budget outlook warmed over the past few months. On Thursday, Minnesota Management and Budget...

Minnesota House on Twitter