The state’s highest court on Monday heard oral arguments in the case of Dayton’s appeal of a lower court ruling last month that found his veto violated the state constitution.
Hanging in the balance is a $128 million appropriation to the Republican-majority House and Senate that the DFL governor controversially cleaved from a state government funding law. At stake, too, are larger constitutional questions over the balance of power between the state’s executive and legislative branches.
It is unknown when a decision will be handed down.
The veto was Dayton’s effort to bring lawmakers back to the negotiating table over a handful of provisions in an omnibus tax bill he found objectionable. Dayton signed the tax and state government finance laws following their passage during a late-May special legislative session, but said he did so only to avoid a large-scale government shutdown like the one experienced in 2011.
“This case comes down, clear and simple, to the language of the constitution, which gives me line-item veto authority,” Dayton said following the hearing.
The governor and his lawyers have argued his veto is supported by the constitution and that the Legislature suppressed his constitutional authority by placing a “poison pill” provision in the omnibus tax law that would have denied appropriations to the Department of Revenue if he had vetoed it.
The House and Senate have maintained that the governor’s line-item veto would “effectively eliminate the legislative branch” if it is upheld and that they are unable to override it because lawmakers have adjourned until February 2018 and only Dayton can call the Legislature back for a special session.
If the court rules in the Legislature’s favor, “It’s status quo — the governor still has all the power that he had,” Senate Majority Leader Paul Gazelka (R-Nisswa) said after the hearing. “If [the court] did rule in the governor’s favor, he suddenly has more power than he has ever had before.”
The Minnesota Supreme Court has ordered the Legislature and Gov. Mark Dayton to use mediation to resolve a funding dispute. In an opinion issued Friday, the court also ruled that Dayton’s use of the line-item veto to strip biennial funding for the Legislature was constitutional.
A Ramsey County judge on Wednesday ruled that Gov. Mark Dayton’s line-item veto of legislative funding violated the state’s constitution.
House and Senate leadership OK a resolution to seek outside legal representation in an effort to restore funding for the Legislature that Gov. Mark Dayton line-item vetoed earlier this week.
Day three of the 2017 special session saw lawmakers pass final omnibus bills to be sent to Gov. Mark Dayton, with weary House members wrapping up their work at 2:42 a.m. Friday following a week of long days — and nights — at the State Capitol.
Lawmakers on conference committees must sort through competing bills before finalizing a product to send to the governor.
The budget process explained — and why it matters
$45 billion plan is about a 10 percent increase over current biennium
Governor urges lawmakers to pass a big capital investment bill during budget-setting year; House Speaker has expressed doubt over bonding this session
It was a day of selfies, swearings-in and standing ovations as the House opened the 2017-18 biennial session Tuesday.