Tasked with crafting a proposal that would offer affordability and accessibility for post-secondary education opportunities, Gov. Mark Dayton has asked lawmakers to do so without attaching policy provisions.
The House passed HF2477/ SF2214*, sponsored by Rep. Bud Nornes (R-Fergus Falls), 77-53 on April 4. The Senate version, sponsored by Senate President Michelle Fischbach (R-Paynesville), passed 36-31 Feb. 28.
With substantial differences in both the House and Senate proposals, a conference committee met Wednesday to begin compromising a path forward.
Under the House proposal, the University of Minnesota would receive $1.2 billion over the 2018-19 biennium, an increase of $10 million in Fiscal Year 2018 and $12 million Fiscal Year 2019. The Senate version proposes an increase of $16.9 million in each fiscal year. The university’s budget request earlier in session was an increase of $147.2 million over the biennium.
Minnesota State would receive $1.4 billion over the biennium per the House bill, an increase of $42 million in Fiscal Year 2018 and $51 million in Fiscal Year 2019. The Senate version proposes $26.7 million and $26.5 million in the respective fiscal years. System officials requested $178 million in new biennial funding.
The Office of Higher Education would receive $501 million during the biennium via the House plan, a $33.8 million increase. The largest portion would go to state grants, allocating $193 million per year. The Senate version proposes $484.6 million in funding, a $17.1 million increase, and allocating $185 million per year for state grants.
The bodies ignored Dayton’s request for a policy-free bill and substantial differences exist between both bills.
For starters, there’s the issue of rising tuition costs for incoming colleges students.
The House version requires a tuition freeze at Minnesota State colleges in the 2017-18 academic year, and at Minnesota State universities in 2018-19 (coupled with a 1 percent tuition reduction that year). The Senate version requires a tuition freeze at all Minnesota State colleges and universities over the biennium.
Minnesota State Chief Financial Officer Laura King opposes both, previously testifying that, “If this bill becomes law, our campuses will have significant financial pressure.”
Both the House and Senate versions “request” and “encourage” a tuition freeze at the University of Minnesota over the biennium. Due to the university’s constitutional autonomy, the state cannot require it to adhere to legislative requests.
Another House policy provision that will likely prove contentious is a requirement that the University of Minnesota obtain approval from an institutional review board before conducting research on fetal tissue. The provision would also require the university to attempt to identify fetal tissue available due to natural death and be subject to legislative reports and audits.
Other House provisions would:
Senate provisions would create a campus sexual violence prevention and response coordinator position within the Office of Higher Education and expand eligibility for teacher shortage grants to those in underrepresented racial and ethnic groups.
Public testimony is expected to be taken at a hearing next week.
The latest numbers are a $517 million swing from the November forecast
The state’s latest economic forecast projects a budget deficit of $188 million for the current two-year biennium, and a $586 million deficit for the 2020-21 biennium
The budget process explained — and why it matters