Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Electricity generated from rooftop solar panels could count toward state goal

Two electrical utility companies in northern Minnesota may be able to count larger rooftop solar energy installations toward a state mandate.

Current law says a fraction of electricity sold by public utilities -- what Rep. Nolan West (R-Blaine) calls a “tiny sliver” -- must come from solar panels on the smallest rooftops. The state’s solar energy standard requires that by 2020, electricity the utilities sell must include at least 1.5 percent generated by solar sources. Of that, 10 percent must come from the smallest solar projects -- those that generate a maximum of 20 kilowatts.

WATCH Full video from Monday's meeting of the House Job Growth and Energy Affordability Policy and Finance Committee

HF1882, sponsored by West, would let Minnesota Power and Ottertail Power Company use small solar projects with a capacity of as much as 40 kilowatts. The bill targets those two companies by restricting its provisions to utilities that have between 50,000 and 200,000 customers.

The House Job Growth and Energy Affordability Policy and Finance Committee held the bill over, as amended, Monday for possible inclusion in an omnibus bill. The companion, SF1649, sponsored by Sen. Bill Ingebrigtsen (Alexandria), awaits action by the Senate Energy and Utilities Finance and Policy Committee.

West said the change would allow the two utilities to apply electricity generated on Minnesota rooftops to meet the goal, instead of buying solar credits. A large house or farm can easily exceed 20 kilowatts, he said.

Rep. Pat Garofalo (R-Farmington), the committee chair, said he is baffled by incentives for small-scale solar in state law, citing lower costs for energy from wind and larger-scale solar farms.

The bill would also:

  • change the scope of a resource plan that public utilities are required to file; and
  • expand the factors the Public Utilities Commission must consider when determining the public interest with regard to a proposed new or refurbished nonrenewable energy facility, or rate recovery for such a facility. 

 


Related Articles


Priority Dailies

Ways and Means Committee OKs proposed $512 million supplemental budget on party-line vote
(House Photography file photo) Meeting more needs or fiscal irresponsibility is one way to sum up the differences among the two parties on a supplemental spending package a year after a $72 billion state budg...
Minnesota’s projected budget surplus balloons to $3.7 billion, but fiscal pressure still looms
(House Photography file photo) Just as Minnesota has experienced a warmer winter than usual, so has the state’s budget outlook warmed over the past few months. On Thursday, Minnesota Management and Budget...

Minnesota House on Twitter