Accessibility menu
State Representative Tina Liebling
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
651-296-0573
For more information contact: Melissa Parker 651-296-8873
NEWS COLUMN
Letter from the Capitol -- March 28, 2005
The pace is getting quicker at the Capitol as the first deadline looms. By April 6, all bills must have passed through their policy committees. Committees are holding additional meetings at night. This means I will need to be in two--or even three--places at once some days this week. I only wish I had a time turner like the one Hermione used in "Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban." Still, it is a privilege to serve you in the Minnesota House.
Budget Battles
The talk last week was about the budget resolution, which was supposed to come to the House floor but did not make it.
The budget resolution sets how much the State can spend from the General Fund for July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2007 (the 2006-07 biennium). The Ways and Means Committee produced a budget resolution that closely matched the Governor's budget proposal. The Governor's budget proposal relies on gambling revenues, program cuts, and property taxes increases to give a modest increase to K-12 schools but little else.
The budget resolution that will come to the House floor--reflecting the will of the Republican House leadership--assumes no new state revenues. The Governor's budget is a wolf in sheep's clothing because it raises taxes, but does it without taking responsibility. Any increases to one area, such as schools, will have to come from another area, such as health care.
Most Republicans argue that this will balance the budget without raising taxes. Instead of an honest discussion of who pays and how much, the Governor's plan will give us another huge property tax increase, more fees, and a shift to gambling--which some call a tax on poor families.
The House now has 68 Republicans and 66 Democrats, so if every Democrat and even one Republican votes against the budget resolution the resolution will fail. Last week one Republican member was missing and at least one other Republican (Dorman) threatened to vote against the bill. Fearing defeat, the House leadership held the bill for another day.
Quite a few people from our district have written and called about the "Dorman/Greiling" amendment that may be offered to raise the budget cap. When the amendment was first announced it was for an increase of $750 million. Rep. Dan Dorman of Albert Lea, a Republican, thought he could get 5-10 other Republican votes to raise the cap, but was unable to get even one. The last word, however, is that Dorman will offer an amendment for an increase in the neighborhood of $358 million, one that would dip into the state's cash account but not require any new revenues.
A higher cap would not require the state to raise taxes or spend more money, but it would leave those options open so we can have a full discussion of where the state's money should come from and where it should go. I would have voted for the original amendment but that would not have passed because some legislators on both sides of the aisle are afraid to be labeled as tax raisers.
I believe this fear of being labeled a "tax raiser" puts too little faith in Minnesotans, who have historically understood that smart investments don't cost, they pay. If you think the state should maintain or increase our investments in MinnesotaCare, provider reimbursements, services to the elderly and people with disabilities, the Mayo-University of Minnesota bioscience partnership, higher education, or any other area, you should be concerned about the budget resolution.
As always, I welcome your opinions on this or any other issue.
Higher Education in Rochester
The Governor's recommendation for Rochester's higher education needs passed through the Senate Higher Education Policy Committee with some changes. This week it will be heard in the Senate Higher Education Finance Committee. The original bill will also be heard in the House Higher Education Policy Committee and in the Government Operations Committee. The bills in both houses call for establishing an eleven-member committee to make decisions about Rochester's higher education future with $200,000 in initial planning funds, and$3 million in startup funding for the new entity.
Our Rochester legislative delegation has worked hard to explain the bill to other members and we have not met any significant opposition. People understand that we are looking for a tailored higher education model that does not replicate what exists elsewhere in Minnesota. The new entity--with no sports teams or bands--might not look like most people's vision of a four-year university, but it would offer upper-division and graduate degrees with a significant research component.
Spousal Support
Next week I will have hearings on two of my bills. My spousal support bill requires the Minnesota Department of Human Services to collect payments for spousal support when a judge orders it as part of a divorce proceeding. The Department has done this for years, but decided last year that the statute did not require this service. My bill does not change anyone's right to spousal support or the ways the payment can be enforced. It simply says that the State must continue to collect the money owed and turn it over to the person entitled to it.
This bill will protect the incomes of close to 2,000 people--many elderly and disabled--who rely on spousal support to get by. It has the extra benefit of helping these people stay off public assistance, and it costs the state next to nothing once it is in place. A constituent told me about the problem, and I am proud to work on fixing it.
Children's Freedom to Breathe Act
Last week I introduced the Children's Freedom to Breathe Act. Since the first child labor laws were passed in the early 1900s, children under 18 have been prohibited from working in hazardous occupations. We generally don't let them mine coal, operate dangerous machinery, or do other jobs that could harm their health. We regulate their hours of work.
We now know that secondhand smoke causes cancer, asthma, and other diseases. We don't allow children under 18 to smoke. How can we allow them to work in clouds of secondhand smoke? My bill would end that.
I hope you had an enjoyable break. It is always a privilege to represent you in the Minnesota House. Your comments help me a great deal. Keep those calls, e-mails, letters, and visits coming!
News Items
- Rep. Tina Liebling Named Chair of House Health and Human Services Policy Committee - (Posted: 2012-11-16 00:00:00)
- Statement on DEED Bonding Project Announcement - (Posted: 2012-09-13 00:00:00)
- Local Legislators to Hold Town Hall Meeting - (Posted: 2012-07-19 00:00:00)
- Archived News Items
- Subscribe to RSS News Feeds
- Read more about RSS.