House Research - MN House of Representatives
Legislature Home | Contact | Accessibility | Help | FAQ | Search
House  |   Senate  |   Joint Departments and Commissions  |   Bill Search and Status  |   Statutes, Laws, and Rules
House of Representatives > House Research > Income Taxes

Taxation of Social Security Benefits


How are Social Security benefits taxed?

Under current law, up to 85 percent of Social Security benefits are subject to federal and state income tax, depending on the taxpayer's income. For taxpayers with provisional incomes less than $25,000 ($32,000 for married joint taxpayers), all Social Security benefits are excluded from taxable income. For provisional incomes between $25,000 and $34,000 ($32,000 and $44,000 for married joint taxpayers), up to 50 percent of Social Security benefits may be subject to tax. For those with provisional incomes over $34,000 ($44,000 for married joint taxpayers), up to 85 percent of Social Security benefits may be included in taxable income.

Return to top


What is provisional income?

In determining the amount of Social Security benefits included in taxable income, the provisional income measure used is adjusted gross income excluding Social Security benefits, plus one-half of Social Security benefits. Tax-exempt interest (e.g., from municipal bonds) is also included in provisional income.

Return to top


What is the average monthly benefit for retired workers?

The average monthly benefit as of June 30, 2010, for couples both receiving benefits is $1,900. This works out to $22,800 per year for a retired couple at the average benefit level. For single recipients the average monthly benefit is $1,158 or $13,896 annually.

The following table shows income levels at which Social Security would be fully exempt, subject to inclusion in taxable income at the 50 percent rate, and subject to inclusion in taxable income at the 85 percent rate for an example couple and single retiree with the average level of benefits. Total income refers to the combination of taxable source income and Social Security.

Taxation of Social Security Benefits, Tax Year 2011

Retired married couple

Annual Social Security income: $22,800

Retired single worker

Annual Social Security income: $13,896

Social Security exempt Total income less than $43,400 Total income less than $31,948
Social Security included in taxable income at 50% rate Total income between $43,400 and $55,400 Total income between $31,948 and $40,948
Social Security included in taxable income at 85% rate Total income between $55,400 and $71,141 Total income between $40,948 and $49,550
Social Security subject to full 85% inclusion in taxable income Total income over $71,141 Total income over $49,550

The table shows that a married couple that receives the average Social Security benefit of $22,800 and has total income from all sources of less than $43,400 is not subject to tax on any Social Security benefits, while a couple with average benefits and total income over $71,141 must include 85 percent of the Social Security, or $19,380, in taxable income. Social Security income included in taxable income is taxed at the same rate as other kinds of income---5.35 percent, 7.05 percent, or 7.85 percent, depending on the total amount of taxable income. [More information on income tax brackets]

Return to top


How much does it cost the state to forego revenues from taxing Social Security benefits?

Minnesota conforms to federal law in excluding all or part of Social Security benefits from income tax. The Minnesota Department of Revenue's Tax Expenditure Budget for 2010-2013 shows an estimated cost in foregone tax revenues of $194.8 million in fiscal year 2011 and $199.7 million in fiscal year 2012 as a result of conforming to federal tax treatment of Social Security benefits.

Return to top


What is the tax treatment of Social Security benefits in other states in 2010?

Nine states do not have an income tax or have a tax limited to specific kinds of unearned income. The nine states: Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, and Wyoming.

Nine states: Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, and Wyoming

Twenty-eight states with an income tax exempt Social Security benefits from taxation. The 28 states: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Delaware, District of Columbia, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Virginia and Wisconsin. Missouri will fully exempt benefits beginning in tax year 2012, and Iowa will fully exempt benefits in 2014.

28 states that exempt Social Security benefits from taxation

Four states exclude a portion of Social Security benefits that are subject to tax at the federal level or provide a full exclusion to taxpayers meeting income requirements. The four states: Connecticut, Iowa, Kansas, and Missouri. The amount excluded in Missouri will increase each year through 2012, when benefits will be fully exempt. The amount excluded in Iowa will increase each year through 2014, when benefits will be fully exempt.

4 states: Connecticut, Iowa, Kansas, and Wisconsin

Three states provide a general retirement income exclusion or credit that may result in the exclusion from taxation of part or all of Social Security benefits or in a credit against taxes otherwise due on Social Security benefits. Three states: Colorado, Utah, and West Virginia.

3 states: Colorado, Utah, and West Virginia

One state, Montana, subjects Social Security benefits to income tax on the same basis as the federal government, but uses a slightly different income measure to determine the amount of benefits subject to tax.

One state: Montana

Six states apply the state income tax to Social Security benefits that are taxable at the federal level. The six states: Minnesota, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Rhode Island, and Vermont.

Seven states: Minnesota, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Rhode Island, and Vermont



February 2011