![]() |
|
| House | Senate | Joint Departments and Commissions | Bill Search and Status | Statutes, Laws, and Rules |
The law permits increments from a housing district to be collected for 25 years after the receipt of the first increment. Minn. Stat. § 469.176, subd. 1b(5). The authority may, in the TIF plan, elect to waive up to the first four years of increment. Minn. Stat. § 469.175, subd. 1b. This allows the authority to avoid using the duration limit for a year in which only a small amount of increment is received.
A special duration limit applies to interest reduction programs. These programs are most commonly, if not exclusively, funded with housing district tax increments. Increments may be collected for an interest reduction program for 15 years after the first interest reduction payment is made. Minn. Stat. § 469.176, subd. 4f. This limit does not, however, limit the duration of the actual housing TIF district. The district may collect increments for the full 25-year duration, if the increments are used for other qualifying purposes (i.e., noninterest costs of the project or another project).
In general, no geographic restrictions apply to housing districts. A housing district may be created anywhere, but its increments must be used for qualifying purposes. However, the law does contain one geographic-based provision: the income limits on qualifying housing do not apply in targeted areas.
Unlike other types of TIF districts, housing districts are largely exempt from the pooling rules. The pooling rules limit the portion of increments that may be spent outside of the TIF district (but within the project area). For a housing district, though, these rules consider amounts spent on housing projects to be within the district, regardless of where the developments are physically located. Minn. Stat. § 469.1763, subd. 2(b).
Increments from a housing district may only be used to finance a "housing project" or public improvements that are directly related to the project, as well as the authority's administrative expenses. Minn. Stat. § 469.176, subd. 4d. The cost of a project includes items such as acquisition, construction, or rehabilitation of the housing, planning, engineering, and architectural services, and related financing costs. Public improvement or infrastructure costs must be directly related to the project. For example, sewer and water connections for or a public access road to the housing could be financed. However, an adjacent road that serves the general public likely could not be.
A housing project is a development that is intended for occupancy, in part, by low- and moderate-income individuals, as defined under a federal, state, or municipal law.
Yes, the law allows up to 20 percent of the total square footage of improvements to be used for purposes other than low- and moderate-income housing. Minn. Stat. § 469.174, subd. 11. This 20 percent share could be used for commercial developments, such as office or retail space. (It also could be used for housing for occupancy by individuals who do not meet the definition of low- and moderate-income housing under the federal, state, or municipal law.) In applying the 20 percent test, only developments that received assistance count.
Two separate sets of income limits apply:
Both of these income limits must be satisfied. The first income limit will vary depending upon the federal, state, or municipal law selected by the authority. The law requires that 80 percent of the fair market value of the project meet the first of these income limits. This will mean that units to be occupied by individuals meeting the income test under the selected law must comprise 80 percent or more of the market value of the property constructed in the district.
Separate income limits are established for rental and owner-occupied developments.
Rental developments must meet one of two tests:
These tests are taken from federal law.
Owner-occupied developments have considerably higher income limits than the rental developments. The general limit is 115 percent of the greater of (1) the area median income or (2) the statewide median income.
Yes, the income limits are adjusted based on family size. Higher limits apply for units designed to serve larger families and lower limits for units for smaller families.
The income limits vary by family size and county or metropolitan area. The limits displayed in the table below apply to a family of four in the seven-county metropolitan area (and in Chisago, Isanti, Sherburne, and Wright counties) and in 46 rural counties. These are the highest and lowest area limits in the state.
| TIF Housing District Income Limits Family of 4 Calendar Year 2010 |
||
| Twin Cities | 46 Rural Counties | |
| Rental Housing Developments | ||
| 50% of area median (20% required) | $42,000 | $29,350 |
| 60% of area median (40% required) | 50,400 | 35,220 |
| Owner-Occupied Housing | ||
| 115% of the > of area or statewide median | 96,600 | 84,100 |
The rental limits apply for the duration of the TIF district, while the owner-occupied limits apply only to the first purchaser of the housing.
Yes, the income limits do not apply in "targeted areas." Minn. Stat. § 469.1761, subd. 1. Targeted areas are defined as census tracts in which 70 percent or more of families have incomes that are 80 percent or less of the statewide median family income. Minn. Stat. § 462C.02, subd. 9(e). The following table shows that 50 census tracts (about 4 percent of all of the census tracts in the state) qualified under this rule. These tracts are located in eight counties; more than half of them are in Hennepin County. (Under the 1990 census, 76 tracts qualified in 18 counties.) Most of these tracts (39 out of 50) are in first-class cities. All of the Hennepin County tracts are in the city of Minneapolis and all but one of the tracts in Ramsey and St. Louis counties are in the cities of St. Paul and Duluth, respectively.
| Targeted Areas | |||
| County | Number of Qualifying Tracts |
Percentage of Tracts Qualifying |
Percentage of Total Qualifying Tracts |
| Beltrami | 1 | 11.1% | 2% |
| Hennepin | 29 | 9.8% | 58% |
|
29 | 58% | |
| Itasca | 1 | 10.0% | 2% |
| Mower | 1 | 12.5% | 2% |
| Polk | 1 | 10.0% | 2% |
| Ramsey total | 6 | 4.3% | 12% |
|
5 | 10% | |
| St. Louis total | 10 | 14.3% | 20% |
|
9 | 18% | |
| Stearns | 1 | 3.6% | 2% |
| Total | 50 | 3.9% | 100% |
Housing districts are exempt from three requirements or rules that apply to other types of TIF districts:
According to the February 2010 Report of the State Auditor, there were 545 active housing districts at the end of calendar year 2008. This is an increase of 178 districts over calendar year 2000 or a 48 percent increase; however, the 2008 amount is 91 lower than in 2007, a 14 percent decrease.
Housing districts comprise about 27 percent of all TIF districts, according the State Auditor's data for calendar year 2008.
October 2010