Bill Comparison Summary of
House File 2323, Third Engrossment/
Senate File 2074, Second Engrossment
Prepared by:
House Research and Senate Counsel, Research and
Fiscal Analysis
April 30, 2009
Table of Contents
Page
Article 1: Income, Corporate, and Estate and Gift Taxes.................................................................... 2
Article 2: County Revenue Reform................................................................................................... 19
Article 3: Property Tax Reform, Accountability, Value, and Efficiency Provisions......................... 23
Article 4: Local Government Flexibility and Mandate Reduction Provisions................................... 30
Article 5: Truth in Taxation................................................................................................................ 32
Article 6: Property Tax....................................................................................................................... 34
Article 7: Aids and Credits................................................................................................................ 49
Article 8: Seasonal Recreational Property Tax Deferral Program...................................................... 52
Article 9: Special Taxes...................................................................................................................... 56
Article 10: Sales and Use Tax............................................................................................................ 57
Article 11: Local Development.......................................................................................................... 65
Article 12: Minerals............................................................................................................................ 73
Article 13: Miscellaneous................................................................................................................... 75
Senate Article 7: Public Finance........................................................................................................ 85
Senate Article 9: Department Individual Income, Corporate Franchise, and Estate Taxes............... 87
Senate Article 10: Department Sales and Use Taxes......................................................................... 88
Senate Article 11: Department Special Taxes.................................................................................... 89
Senate Article 12: Department Property Taxes and Aids.................................................................. 91
Senate Article 13: Department Conditional Use Deeds.................................................................... 94
Senate Article 14: Department Miscellaneous................................................................................... 97
|
Sec. |
Article 2: County Revenue Reform |
|
|
1
|
Local government unit. Removes cities with a population of 2,500
or more from the application of levy limits. |
Article 4, section 61, paragraph (b),
repeals levy limits for cities. |
|
2
|
Levy limit base. Repeals the levy limits for taxes levied in
2010, payable in 2011 for counties. |
Article 4, section 61, paragraph (b),
repeals levy limits for counties. |
|
3
|
Adjusted levy limit base. Repeals the levy limits for taxes levied in 2010,
payable in 2011 for counties. |
Article 4, section 61, paragraph (b),
repeals levy limits for counties. |
|
4
|
Property tax levy limit. Adjusts the county levy limits so that a
county that imposes a local sales tax cannot “levy back” the county program
aid reductions since the new sales tax revenue offsets the cuts. |
No comparable provision |
|
5
|
Authorization, scope. Provides a cross-reference to the new county sales
tax authority in the general local sales tax statutes. |
No comparable provision |
|
6
|
County local option sales tax. Allows a county to impose a local sales tax of ˝
of one percent, subject to a reverse referendum, with the money to go to the
county’s general fund. Subd. 1. Authorization; rates. Allows a county to
impose a local sales tax of ˝ of one percent on all sales taxable under
chapters 297A (general) and a $20 per vehicle excise tax on motor vehicle
sales made by dealers in the county.
Subd. 2. Application of election
requirement. The county is required to post a notice and hold a hearing on the
intent to impose the tax. Voters have
up to 30 days after the public hearing to petition for a reverse referendum
on the issue. Signatures equal to the
greater of (1) 500 or (2) ten percent of the votes cast at the last general
election are needed to trigger the referendum. The referendum may be held at a general or
special election and must pass before the tax would be imposed. A county must notify the commissioner of
revenue by September 1, if they intend to use this authority. Subd. 3. Use of revenues. The county must first use revenues to meet
obligations for preempted local sales taxes under section 4, with the
remainder deposited into the county general fund. Subd. 4. Administration, collection, and
enforcement. A tax imposed under this
section is administered, collected, and enforced according to most of the
general local sales tax statute. Subd. 5. Termination. States that a county can only terminate a tax
imposed under this section if all obligations for preempted local taxes have
been met. |
No comparable provision |
|
7
|
Effect on existing local sales taxes;
satisfaction of preexisting obligations.
Preempts
most local sales taxes in a county imposing a sales tax under section 6 and requires the county
to use its new sales tax revenue to meet obligations related to the preempted
sales taxes. Subd. 1.
Preemption of preexisting local sales taxes. States that if a county imposes a local sales tax
under section 6, that all other local
sales taxes imposed in the county are preempted except for (1) a county
transportation tax, (2) a local sales tax imposed by a city of the first
class (Minneapolis, St. Paul, and Duluth), or (3) a city with a 2007
population of at least 100,000 (Rochester), or (4) the sales tax authorized for Cook County in the 2008
tax bill. To retain its separate local
sales tax Rochester must pass a resolution to that effect within two months
of the enactment of this provision and provide a copy of the resolution to
the county and the commissioner of revenue. Subd. 2. County payment to cities; foregone
revenue. Requires a county imposing a local sales
tax to pay a portion of that revenue to a county to fund obligations
previously funded by any preempted city sales tax. The payments will be made within five
business days of the state making quarterly payments to the county. The payments to cities are calculated under
subdivisions 4 or 5. Subd. 3. Dedication of tax to fund county
projects. Requires a county to
meet any obligations for a preempted county tax out of the revenues from the
new sales tax. This only applies to the Hennepin County tax of 0.15% to fund
the Twins stadium. Subd. 4. Calculation of foregone revenue in
cities located entirely within a county.
Provides
the mechanism to calculate the county payments to a city with a preempted
sales tax. The payment in the first
year are based on the collections from the previous year in the city,
adjusted for the percent change in current state sales tax revenue
collections over the previous year. In
subsequent years the quarterly payments will be based on the quarterly
payment in the previous year, adjusted for the percent change in the county sales
tax revenue in the current quarter, compared to the same quarter in the
previous year. Subd. 5. Calculation of foregone revenues
in cities partially located within a county.
Provides
the mechanism to calculate the county payments to a city with a preempted
sales tax that is split between more than one county. There are two “split” cities with city
sales taxes – Mankato and St. Cloud.
The split of city existing sales tax revenue between the different
county portions of the city shall be determined in a reasonable manner by the
commissioner of revenue in consultation with the county and city, however, if
no other option is agreed to the split will be made based on the share of the
city’s nonutility commercial and industrial property in each part of the
city. A county’s revenue payment to
the city is then based on the same mechanism as in subdivision 4, but
multiplied by the county share. Subd. 6. Establishment of special sales tax
districts within certain cities. Provides
for the case where a county tax is imposed in one part of a “split” city but
not in another. A special taxing
district is then established in the part of the city outside of a county
imposing a sales tax. The special
taxing district will impose the sales tax in the remaining portion of the
city and used to pay for the obligations under the preempted city sales
tax. This is necessary because the
Streamlined Sales and Use tax Agreement (SSUTA) prohibits a city from
imposing different rates in different parts of the city. |
No comparable provision |
|
8
|
County program aid. Freezes county program aid distribution at the Pay
2009 certified distribution and then reduces each county’s aid in Pay 2010
and thereafter by one of the following amounts: } If a county does not
impose a local sales tax its aid is reduced by an amount equal to 3.58
percent of its 2009 levy plus aid amount. } If a county does
impose a local sales tax its aid is not reduced for the first $7 per capita
or $70,000 in revenue, whichever is greater.
Aid is reduced by an amount equal to 50% of its net sales tax revenue
over $7 per capita, or 470,000, whichever is greater, and an additional 25%
of its net sales tax revenue in excess of $17 dollars per capita or $170,000,
whichever is greater. “Net sale tax
revenue” is the revenue raised by a sales tax under section 6 minus the revenues used
to fund obligations under section 7. |
Article 5, section 6, subd. 2. The formula continues to determine the
distribution but each county’s program aid is reduced by 0.5 percent of the
previous year’s levy, plus aid for 2010, 2011, and 2012. |
|
9
|
Counties (appropriation). Eliminates the cap on the county program
aid appropriation for 2010 and thereafter, since CPA amounts would be
determined under section 8. Provides an explicit appropriation for
public defenders and local impact notes currently paid from the county
program aid appropriation. Provides
that the commissioner of finance shall use a portion of the appropriation to
contract with associations of local governments for preparing local impact
notes. Specifies that 2009 CPA
distributions will be the original 2009 certified amounts minus the
reductions provided under article 7, section 7. |
No comparable provision |
|
10
|
Repealer.
Repeals
the formulas for the different portions of county program aid. |
No comparable provision |
|
Sec. |
Article 3: Property Tax Reform, Accountability, Value, and Efficiency Provisions |
Senate
has no comparable provisions to entire article |
|
1
|
Council on local results and innovation. Subd. 1. Creation. Creates the council with 11 members,
including the state auditor, eight persons who are not legislators appointed
by the chair and minority leads of the house and senate committees with
jurisdiction over property taxes, and one person each appointed by the
Association of Minnesota Counties and the League of Minnesota Cities. Specifies four-year, staggered terms,
desired knowledge, and experience of appointees. Provides that after the initial
appointments, the eight appointments by legislators must be made by the
council. Subd. 2. Duties. (a) By February 15, 2010, requires the
council to develop approximately ten
standard performance measures for counties and ten for cities aimed at
measuring the efficiency and effectiveness of counties and cities in
providing services. (b) By February 15, 2011,
requires the council to develop minimum standards for comprehensive
performance measurement systems, which may vary by size and type of
jurisdiction. (c) Requires the council to serve as a statewide resource to aid in the
development, promotion, and implementation of local government performance
measurement systems. Subd. 3. Reports. Requires the council to report its initial
set of county and city standard performance measures to the property tax committees
of the house and senate by February 28, 2010. Requires an annual report by
February 1 in subsequent years. Permits the state auditor to make the reports
instead of the council if agreed by both the state auditor and the council. Subd. 4. Operation of council. Directs the state auditor to convene the
first council meeting; provides for the chair to be elected by and from among
the council members for two-year terms; provides that council members serve
without compensation; provides that council members are to rotate and share
administrative support responsibilities; exempts the council from the open
meeting law but requires it to conduct open meetings; and requires meeting
notices to be published on the state auditor’s web site. Subd. 5. Termination. Provides that the
council expires January 1, 2019. Effective upon
enactment. |
|
|
2
|
Local performance measurement and
reporting. Subd. 1. Reports of local performance
measures. Requires a county or city that participates
in the standard measures program to report results to its citizens annually
and to file a report with the state auditor by July 1. Describes two levels of participation. A city or county participating
in the standard measures program must report on results for the standard set
of performance measures. In 2011, a city or county participating in the
comprehensive performance measurement program must submit a resolution
indicating it either has implemented or is in the process of implementing a
local performance measurement system meeting the minimum standards. In 2012
and thereafter, comprehensive performance measurement system participants
must affirm that they have implemented a local performance measurement system
meeting the minimum standards. Subd. 2. Benefits of participation. (a) A participant in 2010 may receive a per
capita reimbursement of 25 cents, up to $25,000, and is exempt from levy
limits and truth in taxation hearing requirements for taxes payable in 2011. (b) A participant in the standard measures program in 2011 may receive
a per capita reimbursement of 25 cents, up to $25,000. A participant in the comprehensive
performance measurement program in 2011 is exempt from levy limits and truth
in taxation hearing requirements for taxes payable in 2012. (c) A participant in the standard measures program in 2012 or any year
thereafter may receive a per capita reimbursement of 25 cents, up to $25,000.
A participant in the comprehensive performance measurement program in 2012 or
any year thereafter is exempt from levy limits and truth in taxation hearing
requirements for taxes payable in the following year. Subd. 3. Certification of participation. Directs the state auditor to certify
participation to the commissioner of revenue. Provides for the commissioner
of revenue to make the per capita reimbursements and notify each city and
county that is exempt from levy limits. Subd. 4. Appropriation. Establishes a standing appropriation from
the general fund for payments made under this section. Effective December 31,
2009. |
|
|
3
|
Local support levels. Paragraph (a) modifies the existing formula for
calculating the minimum library maintenance of effort (MOE) to be based on
the average of adjusted net tax capacity (ANTC) for the second, third and
fourth preceding years. Currently this
is based on the ANTC from the second preceding year. Effective beginning with calendar year
2011. Paragraph (b) requires
that counties and cities notify the regional library system, which will
notify the Department of Education, if they want to reduce their MOE for aid
cuts under section 4. |
|
|
4
|
Regional libraries, maintenance of effort
(MOE). This section makes three changes. (a) Changes the minimum
MOE for each county and city to be its lowest library spending in the second
or third preceding year. Under current
law, a county or city has to spend at least the amount it spent two years ago
which means that if a city or county increases its library spending it must
maintain that higher levy of spending every other year in perpetuity. (b) and (c) Allow a city
or county to reduce its library MOE if general purpose county or city state
aids and credits are cut. The allowed
reduction is the lesser of (1) 10 percent of its current MOE, or (2) a
percent equal to percent of its aid and credit cut to its levy plus general
purpose aids. The percent in clause
(2) is based on the certified aid and levy amounts for the current year for
cuts that occur after the current year’s levies have been set, and on the
paid amount of levy plus aids in the previous year for proposed future
cuts. Requires that the Pay 2009
reductions be based on both 2008 unallotments and 2009 aid and credit
cuts. The commissioner of revenue is
required to calculate the MOE reductions for calendar year 2009 and in future
years must certify the percentage used in calculating reductions under
paragraph (c) to the commissioner of education by August 1 of the year prior
to the year in which the reduced aids are paid. (d) States that
regardless of the allowed cuts in paragraphs (a) to (c), no city or county
MOE can go below the minimum required effort currently in law. Also states that if a county imposes a
local option tax under the provisions of article 1, they may not reduce their
MOE under paragraphs (b) or (c). Effective for support in
calendar year 2009 and thereafter for library grants paid in fiscal year 2010
and thereafter, except that changes in paragraph (a) are effective for
support in calendar year 2010 and thereafter. |
|
|
5
|
Collaborative responsibilities. Removes the maintenance of effort requirement from
the children’s mental health collaborative.
The intent is that this is replaced with the general MOE in section 8. Effective beginning January 1, 2012. |
|
|
6
|
Facilities.
Removes
the county responsibility for funding temporary commitment of sexual
predators before final commitment. The intent is that this is replaced with
the general MOE in section 8. Effective beginning January 1, 2012. |
|
|
7
|
Eligibility. Removes some mandatory county payments
related to chemical dependency. The
intent is that this is replaced with the general MOE in section 8. Effective beginning January 1, 2012. |
|
|
8
|
Equitable funding health and human service
services reform. Consolidates and changes
the county funding of local health and human service programs beginning in calendar
year 2012. Subd. 1. Reform. Enumerates the goals
that are to be achieved by this change in funding mechanism for health and
human service programs. Subd. 2. Consolidated program funding. Provides that each county will have a local health
and human service MOE equal to a uniform percentage of its adjusted net tax
capacity, subject to some limits on increases. The percentage is set at a rate so that the
total MOE amount for all counties is equal to the sum of the existing
required local spending for health and human services. Paragraph (a) lists the programs whose county share of funding will be replaced
with the revenues raised by this new MOE. Paragraph (b) requires the commissioner of health and human services do
whatever collection and/or allocation of all or a portion of the total county
MOEs necessary to meet federal matching requirements. Any part of a county’s MOE not needed for
federal matching may be spent at the discretion of the county. Paragraphs (c) and (d) explain how the MOE is calculated. Paragraph (e) limits the increase in the MOE in any year to one percent
of a county’s property tax levy in the previous year, unless the increase is
due to tax base growth. This allows
counties that spend below the average to gradually increase toward the
spending level, as a share of tax base. Subd. 3. County discretionary
spending. States that a county may
spend more than the amount required under this section on health and human
services but they may not be required to maintain the higher spending level
into the future. |
|
|
9
|
Property tax system benchmarks and critical
indicators. Subd. 1.
Purpose. States that state policy makers
should be provided with the tools to create a more accountable and efficient
property tax system. This section
contains the principals and the available tools necessary to work toward
achieving that goal. Subd. 2.
Property tax principles. Contains
the basic property tax principals that should be taken into consideration in
evaluating the various property tax proposals that come before the
legislature. The principals are transparent
and understandable; simple and efficient; equitable; stable and predictable;
compliance and accountability; competitive, both nationally and globally; and responsive to economic conditions. Subd. 3.
Major indicators. Provides that there are many
different types of indicators available to legislators to evaluate tax
legislation, each has its own limitations.
Contains the following list of the available major indicators: property
tax principles scale (components are listed in subdivision 2) relate to the
property tax system features; price of government report; tax incidence
report; tax expenditure budget and report; state tax rankings; property tax
levy plus aid data, and market value and net tax capacity data by taxing
district; effective tax rate and equalized effective
tax rate; assessment sales ratio study; “Voss” data base, which matches
homeowner property taxes and household income; revenue estimates and state
fiscal notes; and local impact notes, with improved local analysis as
described in subdivision 7. Subd. 4.
Property tax working group. Establishes
a working group. The goals of the
working group are: to investigate ways to simplify the property tax system,
to reexamine the property tax calendar, and to determine the cost versus the
benefits of the various property tax components. Provides for the working group to have 12 members appointed as follows: } two house members, one from the majority caucus
and one from the minority caucus, both appointed by the tax committee chair }
two senators,
one from the majority caucus and one from the minority caucus, both appointed
by the tax committee chair }
the
commissioner of revenue or the commissioner’s designee }
one person
from each: appointed by the
Association of Minnesota Counties, the League of Minnesota Cities, the
Minnesota Association of Townships, the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, and
the Minnesota Association of Assessing Officers }
two
homeowners, one under 65 and one over 65, appointed by the commissioner of
revenue. Provides for the commissioner of revenue to
convene the first meeting and then for the working group to elect a
chair. The working group meets at the
call of the chair and members serve without compensation. Requires the working group to make its advisory
recommendations to the chairs of the house and senate tax committees on or
before February 1, 2011, at which time the working group is finished (and
this subdivision expires). Subd. 5. Tax committee review and resolution. Requires
that on or before March 1, 2011, and every two years thereafter, the house
and senate tax committees must review the major indicators (as contained in
subdivision 3) and ascertain the accountability and efficiency of the
property tax system. Requires each
committee to prepare a resolution on targets and benchmarks for use during
the current biennium. Subd.
6. Department of Revenue; revenue
estimates. Requires that beginning with the 2010 legislative session, the
revenue estimates prepared by the Department of Revenue must also identify
how the property tax principles (contained in subdivision 2) apply to the
proposed changes. Requires the
commissioner to develop a scale for measuring the appropriate principles for
each proposed change. If possible,
requires the department to quantify the effects, or at a minimum identify the
relevant factors so that legislators are aware of possible outcomes,
including administrative difficulties and cost. The interaction of property tax shifting
should be identified. Subd. 7. Local impact notes. Seeks more
participation from political subdivisions for the local impact note
process. Creates a local impact
network of political subdivisions consisting of at least one representative
association from Minnesota counties, cities, towns, and school districts, and
other members as needed. Requires them
to work with the legislature and the commissioner of finance to analyze
changes in local government tax revenues and expenditures and incidences of
tax shifting. For tax bills, the local
impact network shall rate the impact on the tax system using the tax
principles contained in subdivision 2.
Some of the cost for preparing these local impact notes shall be
provided under section 2. Effective the day following final enactment. |
|
|
10
|
Reimbursement reductions. Provides for minor reductions in market
value credit reimbursements each year to fund per capita payments for
counties and cities participating in the local performance measurement
program in section 2, and for certain
administrative costs related to the commission on local results and
improvement (sections 1 and 2), the property tax
working group (section 9), and the computation
of library MOE support levels (section 3). |
|
|
11
|
Temporary suspension of new or increased
maintenance of effort and matching fund requirements. Imposes a two-year moratorium on the
implementation of new or increased MOE or matching fund requirements. This should give the Legislative Commission on
Mandate Reform, established in another article of the bill, time to study and
make recommendations on any new proposals. To avoid causing a problem with the new
federal stimulus bill that may require some increased spending, the counties
and cities will remain responsible if the city or county is currently
providing the federal MOE or match and the federal government increases those
requirements. Effective the day after
enactment. |
|
|
12
|
Repealer.
Repeals
a number of health and human service maintenance of effort and matching fund
requirements in law. Effective January
1, 2012 but contingent on the implementation of new funding mechanisms using
revenues generated by the new MOE in section 8. |
|
|
Sec. |
Article 4: Local Government Flexibility and Mandate Reduction Provisions |
Senate bill has no comparable
provisions to entire article. Some
provisions are comparable to provisions in S.F. 3 – these are indicated |
|
1
|
Objections to rules. Adds the Legislative Commission on Mandate
Reform, established below, to the law that authorizes the Legislative
Coordinating Commission or a house or senate committee with jurisdiction over
administrative rules to file an objection to a rule with the secretary of
state, which has the effect of placing the burden of proving the validity of
the rule on the agency in any proceeding for judicial review or enforcement
of the rule. Also permits the
commission to petition for declaratory judgment as to the validity of a rule
objected to and to intervene in litigation. |
|
|
2
|
Public hearings by state agencies. Adds the Legislative Commission on Mandate
Reform, established below, to the law that authorizes the Legislative
Coordinating Commission to request an agency to hold a public hearing on
rules to which the commission objects. |
|
|
3
|
Legislative Commission on Mandate Reform;
established. Subd. 1. Established. Subd. 2. Membership. Four senators appointed by the senate
subcommittee on committees and three senators appointed by the senate
minority leader; four house members appointed by the speaker and three
appointed by the house minority leader. Subd. 3. Terms; vacancies. Two-year terms. Vacancies must be filled so as to preserve
the representation established in this section. Subd. 4. Chair. Elected by and from among the members for
two years. Must alternate between
house and senate. Subd. 5. Compensation. May be reimbursed for reasonable expenses
as members of the legislature. Subd. 6. Staff. Direct the Legislative Coordinating
Commission to provide administrative support. Subd. 7. Meetings; procedures; tie votes. Meetings at the call of the chair. Action requires votes in favor by at least
four house members and four senators. Subd. 8. Funding. Directs the commission to bill the
commissioner of revenue for costs of administrative support and grants, up to
$100,000 per year. Provides for one half
the costs to come from state aid to counties and one half to come from state
aid to cities. |
|
|
4
|
Legislative Commission on Mandate Reform;
review and recommendations to legislature.
Directs the commission to solicit from local governments information
on laws and rules that are problematic mandates and then to determine why
each was enacted or adopted, if that reason still exists, costs to comply,
and whether it can be repealed or modified.
Requires the commission to submit a bill with mandate reform each
session. |
|
|
5
|
Legislative Commission on Mandate Reform;
grants. Provides for the commission to make
recommendations to the commissioner of revenue to make grants to local
government associations, the University of Minnesota, MnSCU, or other
accredited postsecondary institutions to research and make recommendations on
mandate reform. |
|
|
6
|
Expiration. The
commission expires June 30, 2013. |
|
|
7
|
Effective date for rules requiring local implementation. Provides two set times
a year for rules to take effect if they would require a local government to
make a plan or ordinance change. Subd. 1. Determination. Requires a state agency to determine if a
local government (city county, town) will be required to adopt or amend a
local regulation to comply with a proposed rule. Provides for the administrative law judge
(ALJ) to approve or disapprove. Subd. 2. Effective dates. Provides that a rule becomes effective the
next July 1 or January 1, or a later date provided by the law or rule, after
final adoption if it does require a new or amended local regulation. Subd. 3. Exceptions. Provides that the effective dates in
subdivision 2 do not apply when the good cause exemption, expedited
rulemaking process, or process for repealing obsolete rules apply, or when
any other law specifies that the rulemaking process in chapter 14 do not
apply; if federal law requires an effective date before the dates in
subdivision 2; or the governor waives application of subdivision 2. |
S.F. 3, article 5, section 2. Similar provision; allows one more exception in
subdivision 3 – if the agency has been directed by law to adopt the rule or
to commence the rulemaking process. |
|
8
|
Best value contracting. Strikes the limit on the number of
contracts per year for all entities. |
|
|
9
|
Abandonment; end of operation as cemetery. Permits a county that has taken over an
abandoned cemetery to prohibit further burials in the cemetery. |
S.F. No. 3, article 5, section 5 is
identical. |
|
10
|
Compensation of (fence) viewers. Strikes the $60 cap on compensation for
fence viewers and allows a town board to recover all costs. The language is based on the damages
provision in the law governing establishment of cartways. |
S.F. No. 3, article 5, section 7 is
identical. |
|
11
|
Public burial ground is town’s after ten
years. Permits a town that has assumed ownership
of a cemetery to prohibit further burials in it. |
S.F. No. 3, article 5, section 7 is
similar; it also authorizes the town to “cease acceptance of responsibility
for new burials.” |
|
12
|
Plans and specifications, advertisement for
bids. Updates the threshold amounts for contracts
and day labor under the special assessment statute by providing a
cross-reference to the Uniform Municipal Contracting Law (UMCL). |
S.F. No. 3, article 5, section 17 is
same. |
|
13
|
Contracts; day labor. Same as section 12. |
S.F. No. 3, article 5, section 18 is
same. |
|
14
|
Letting of contracts; performance bonds
(HRA). Same as sections 12 and 13. |
S.F. No. 3, article 5, section 19 is
same. |
|
15
|
Fee. Strikes
the $10 cap on booking fees and allows a county to recover actual costs of
booking. |
|
|
16
|
Legislative Commission on Mandate Reform;
first meeting. Requires a first meeting of the
Legislative Commission on Mandate Reform, established in section 3, as soon as practicable
after all appointments are made.
Provides for the speaker of the house to designate a commission member
to convene the first meeting. |
|
|
Sec. |
Article 5: Truth in Taxation |
|
|
1
|
Budgets; form of notification (TnT). Conforming change related to eliminating
the truth in taxation hearing requirement.
Effective for taxes payable in 2010 and thereafter. |
Article 4, section 1, same |
|
2
|
Proposed levy. Advances the dates for each taxing
authority certifying their proposed levy to the county auditor. Effective for taxes payable in 2011 and
thereafter. |
Article 4, section 22. Senate language does not advance the date
for levy certification. The language
regarding subsequent meetings is the same. |
|
3
|
Overlapping jurisdictions. Advances the dates for
certifying the proposed levy and the proposed tax rate to the other county
auditors when taxing authorities lie in two or more counties and allows the
notice to refer to a regularly scheduled meeting, rather than a separate
public hearing. Effective for taxes
payable in 2011 and thereafter. |
S.F. No. 3, article 6, section is
same, except it does not advance the dates. |
|
4
|
Levy; shared, merged, consolidated
services. Advancing the dates for certifying proposed
levies when two or more taxing authorities are in the process of negotiating
an agreement for sharing, merging, or consolidating services. Effective for taxes payable in 2011 and
thereafter. |
No comparable provision |
|
5
|
Notice of proposed property taxes. Advances the date for mailing the proposed
truth in taxation notices from November 10-24 to October 15-24. Many of the dates that are advanced in
other sections of this article are to allow for the necessary information to
be available to the county auditor so that the TnT notices can be mailed out
earlier. Effective for taxes payable
in 2011 and thereafter. |
No comparable provision |
|
|
Also includes the
requirement that since the truth in taxation hearings have been eliminated,
the taxing authorities must provide the county auditor with information on
when their regularly scheduled meetings (which occur after the notice has
been mailed) at which the budget and levy will be discussed. Effective for taxes payable in 2010 and
thereafter. |
Article 4, section 23. Same, except that the Senate language also strikes a reference to a levy limit increase approved by the voters. |
|
6
|
Adoption of budget and levy (TnT). Strikes the language prescribing the TnT
hearing and authorizes unalloted aid to be certified in excess of the TnT
levy under article 13, section 6. Effective for taxes payable in 2010 and
thereafter. |
Article 4, section 25, same, except
the Senate language allows an exception to increase the levy for emergency
debt certificates issued after the proposed levy was certified and does not
contain the authority to recertify the levy for unallotment of aid. |
|
7
|
Certification of levy. Advances the dates for the taxing
authorities to certify their final levy to the county auditor. Effective for taxes payable in 2011 and
thereafter. |
No comparable provision |
|
8
|
Report to commissioner. Advances the dates for the county auditor
to report to the commissioner of revenue the proposed levies of the various
taxing authorities in the county.
Effective for taxes payable in 2011 and thereafter. |
No comparable provision |
|
9
|
Determination of county tax rate (TnT). Conforming change related to eliminating
the truth in taxation hearing requirement.
Effective for taxes payable in 2010 and thereafter. |
Article 4, section 31, same. |
|
10
|
Duties (TnT). Conforming
change related to eliminating the truth in taxation hearing requirement. Effective for taxes payable in 2010 and
thereafter. |
Article 4, section 32, same. |
|
11
|
Tax levy for repayment (TnT). Conforming change related to eliminating
the truth in taxation hearing requirement. Effective for taxes payable in
2010 and thereafter. |
Article 4, section 38, same. |
|
12
|
Application of other laws (TnT). Conforming change related to eliminating
the truth in taxation hearing requirement.
Effective for taxes payable in 2010 and thereafter. |
Article 4, section 39, same. |
|
13
|
Budget (TnT). Conforming
change related to eliminating the truth in taxation hearing requirement. Effective for taxes payable in 2010 and
thereafter. |
Article 4, section 42, same, except
Senate language does not advance the date for the budget adoption. |
|
14
|
Repealer. Repeals
the provisions related to the truth in taxation hearing and newspaper
notice. Effective for taxes payable in
2010 and thereafter. |
Article 4, section 61, repeals the
Truth in Taxation hearing, but not the newspaper notice. Senate Article 4, section 24, suspends
the Truth in Taxation newspaper
advertisement requirement for payable years 2010 and 2011. |
|
Sec. |
Article 6: Property Tax |
Article 4:
Property Tax |
|
1
|
Agricultural preserve; eligibility. Terminates participation in the agricultural land
preservation program for a violation
of agricultural chemical or water protection laws. Requires any deferred special assessments
to be paid, plus back-taxes equal to the tax benefits received over the last
five years. Prohibits reenrollment for
a period of three years. Effective for
payable 2011 and thereafter. |
No comparable provision |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 2. Interdistrict cooperation. Provides that school districts with career and technical programs that are part of an interdistrict cooperation agreement must allocate the levy for the program among the participating districts. |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 3. Referendum market value; seasonal recreational property. Provides that noncommercial seasonal recreational property, such as cabins, will no longer be excluded from "referendum market value." This has the effect of making this property subject to school referendum levies. |
|
|
Art. 1, Sec. 14 of H.F. 2
contains similar, but not identical, provision |
Section 4. Retired employee health benefits. Clarifies the effective date for school levies for retired employee health benefits. |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 5. Emergency Medical Services Taxing District Board. Provides that in cases where only part of a township participates in the medical services district, all partial townships in the district will be represented by a single member on the taxing district board. |
|
2
|
Institutions of public charity. (a) Provides that institutions of purely public
charity that are exempt from federal income taxes under section 501(c)(3) are
exempt from property tax if they meet the requirements of this
subdivision. When determining whether
the real property is exempt, the following factors must be considered, which
are a general codification of the “North Star” factors: 1.
Whether the
stated purpose of the undertaking is to be helpful without immediate
expectation of material reward; 2.
Whether the
institution of public charity is supported by material donations, gifts, or
government grants for services to the public in whole or in part; 3.
Whether a
material number of the recipients of the charity receive benefits or services
at reduced or no cost, or whether the organization provides services to the
public that alleviate burdens or responsibilities that would otherwise borne
by the government; |
Article 4, section 6, same, except: |
|
|
4.
Whether the
income received, including material gifts and donations, produces a profit to
the institution that is distributed to private interests; 5.
Whether the
beneficiaries of the charity are restricted or unrestricted, and if
restricted, whether the class of persons to whom the charity is made
available is one having reasonable relationship to the charitable objectives;
and 6.
Whether
dividends, in form or substance, or assets upon dissolution, are available to
private interests. |
Senate language refers to profit that
is not distributed to private interests. |
|
|
For a property to be exempt under this
subdivision, the charitable organization must satisfy the factors in clauses
(1) to (6), unless there is a reasonable justification for missing the
factors in (2), (3), or (5). If there
is a reasonable justification for failing to meet the factors in clauses (2),
(3), or (5), an organization is a public charity without meeting those
factors. An exemption properly granted
under this subdivision will remain in effect unless there is a material
change in the facts. (b) Defines
“grants” as a written instrument or electronic document defining a legal
relationship between a granting agency and a grantee when its principal
purpose is to transfer cash or something of value to the grantee to support a
public purpose authorized in law in a general manner, instead of acquiring by
professional or technical contract, purchase, lease, or barter property or
services for the direct benefit or use of the granting agency. This section is effective for taxes payable in
2010 and thereafter. |
Senate
language refers to a “compelling factual reason” rather than “reasonable
justification.” |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 7. Utility pollution control property tax exemption. Requires the Commissioner of Revenue to submit the advice of the Pollution Control Agency regarding a requested personal property tax exemption for electric generation pollution control equipment to the municipality and the county where the property is located for their approval. The local governments must submit their approval or disapproval to the Commissioner of Revenue within 90 days, or the exemption is deemed to be approved. |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 8. Apprenticeship training facilities; property tax exemption. Provides that the current law property tax exemption for apprenticeship training facilities extends to the land on which the building is located, not to exceed five acres. Parking areas on the exempt land are exempt to the extent that they are used for the purposes of the training facility. |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 10. Electric generation personal property exemption. Provides that the personal property of a described electric generation facility will be exempt from property taxation for three years. The exemption is phased out over the following three years. To qualify for the exemption, the facility must: · exceed 40 megawatts of installed capacity, but not exceed 125 megawatts of installed capacity; · utilize natural gas as a primary fuel; · be located within two miles of parallel existing 36‑inch natural gas pipelines and an existing 115‑kilovolt electric transmission line; · be designed to provide peaking, emergency backup or contingency services; and · satisfy a resource deficiency identified in an approved integrated resource plan. |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 11. Phaseout of exemptions for electric generation personal property. Provides that exemptions for electric generation personal property will be allowed in full for three years and the exemption will be phased out by one‑third each year over the following three years. Existing exemptions that have been in place for more than three years will be phased out beginning with the 2009 assessment year. |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 12. Elderly living facility exemption. Provides a property tax exemption for an elderly living facility that meets the following requirements: · the facility consists of no more than 75 living units; · it is located in a city with a population of more than 350,000; · it is owned and operated by a nonprofit corporation; · the owner of the facility is an affiliate of entities that own and operate assisted living and skilled nursing facilities that are located across a street from the facility, are adjacent to a church, include a congregate dining program, and provide assisted living or similar social and physical support; · the residents of the facility must be at least 62 years of age or handicapped; · before the effective date of the subdivision, the facility has received certain approvals from the city. The exemption from property taxes would extend for the longer of 25 years or the term of the facility's initial permanent financing. |
|
3
|
Nursing homes. Provides a property tax exemption for nonprofit
nursing homes or boarding care facilities that are certified to participate
in the medical assistance program or that certify to the commissioner of
revenue that they do not discharge residents due to their inability to
pay. Effective for taxes payable in
2010 and thereafter. |
Article 4, section 13, same |
|
4
|
Railroad wye connections. Exempts any portion of a railroad wye connection
including the track, ties, ballast, switch gear, and related equipment, if it
meets all of the following: 1.
is publicly owned; 2.
is funded, in whole or in part, by state grants; 3.
is located within the metropolitan area; 4.
includes a single track segment that is no longer than 2,500 feet in
length; 5.
connects intersecting rail lines; and 6.
is constructed after January 1, 2009. This section (which is in
the City of New Brighton, Ramsey County) is effective for assessment year
2009 and thereafter, for taxes payable in 2010 and thereafter. |
Article 4, section 14, same, except
House language specifies “real or personal property” while Senate language
refers to “any portion” of a railroad wye connection. |
|
5
|
Electric generation facility; personal
property. Exempts attached
machinery and other personal property that is part of an electric generation
facility that meets certain conditions from property taxes. (The proposed facility is in Lent Township,
Chisago County.) Some of the
conditions are that the facility: ·
has installed capacity between 150 and 780 megawatts; ·
is designed
to utilize natural gas as a primary fuel; |
Article 4, section 9, same, except: |
|
|
·
is owned by an
entity other than a public utility; ·
is located near
existing interstate natural gas pipelines and an electric transmission
substation; |
Senate language refers to “not owned
by a public utility.” |
|
|
·
is subject to
a development agreement with the county board adopted by a two-thirds vote of
the county board; |
No comparable provision |
|
|
·
is subject to
a development agreement with the township board adopted by a two-thirds vote
of the township board; and ·
is to be
constructed starting sometime after March 1, 2010, and before March 1, 2014. |
No comparable provision |
|
|
Effective the day following final enactment. |
Effective for taxes payable in 2010
and thereafter, subject to phase out in section 11. |
|
6
|
Personal property exemption; electric
generating plants (generic). Subdivision 1. New electric generating plants. Provides a general exemption for personal property
of electric generating plants built and placed in service after January 1,
2010, if a siting agreement signed by the utility and the host county and
city or town, is filed with the commissioner of revenue. Subd. 2. Definition; applicability. Defines “personal
property” as tools, implements, and machinery of the generating plant. The exemption does not apply to
transformers, transmission lines, distribution lines, or any other tools,
implements, and machinery that are part of an electric substation, wherever
located. Effective the day
following final enactment. |
No comparable provision |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 15. Leased seasonal recreational land. Modifies the property tax exemption that applies to leased seasonal recreational property. It removes the requirement that a county board must approve the exemption as well as the requirement that the particular parcel was exempt from taxation for property taxes payable in 2008. |
|
7
|
Distribution of revenues. Modifies the formula for distribution of
revenues from the wind energy production tax for 2010 and thereafter, so that
80 percent of the revenues are distributed to the county and 20 percent to
the city or township. Under current
law, the distribution is 80 percent to the county, 14 percent to the city or
township, and 6 percent to the school district. |
No comparable provision |
|
8
|
Cross-compliance with applicable laws. Terminates participation
in Green Acres for a violation of
agricultural chemical or water protection laws. Requires any deferred special assessments
to be paid, plus back-taxes equal to five years of the tax benefits
received. Prohibits reenrollment for a
period of three years. Effective for
taxes payable in 2011 and thereafter. |
No comparable provision |
|
|
No comparable provision; the property tax credit is repealed in section 39,
and a comparable grant program is created in article 13, section 2 |
Section 16. Bovine tuberculosis credit definitions. Modifies the definitions that apply to this program. The definition of the zone is no longer referred to as a "proposed" zone, but instead means the modified accredited zone that has been designated by the Board of Animal Health. The reference to "located within" means that the herd is kept in the area for at least part of calendar years 2006, 2007, or 2008. Current law is limited to 2007 and a new definition of "animal" is added to mean cattle, bison, goats, and farmed cervidae. |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 17. Bovine tuberculosis credit calculation. Clarifies the application of the credit to rural vacant land as well as agricultural land. The amount of the credit will be determined as the greater of $5.00 per acre on the first 160 acres of property where the herd had been located or an amount equal to $5.00 per acre, times five acres, times the highest number of animals tested on the property for bovine tuberculosis in 2006, 2007, or 2008. The amount of the credit may not exceed the property tax payable on the land where the herd had been located, excluding the tax attributable to residential structures. |
|
9
|
Preservation of riparian buffers. Subdivision 1. Definitions. Defines “riparian buffer” as a strip of
original or restored native vegetation adjacent to public waters that extends
a minimum of 50 and a maximum of 100 feet from the ordinary high water level. Subd. 2.
Requirements. (a) Provides that land must be classified as 2a or adjacent to land
classified as 2a to be enrolled in the program. (b) Provides that the buffer must be maintained in a natural state, and
that annual buffer maintenance will be performed. Provides that the property owner must file
an affidavit every three years stating that the buffer has been
maintained. (c) Provides that property enrolled in the program will be liable for
taxes based on the reduced valuation prescribed in subdivision 3, and that
all special assessments shall be deferred until the property is withdrawn or
becomes ineligible. (d) Provides that land enrolled under this program may not be enrolled
in other reduced valuation programs, such as “Green Acres.” Also provides that land removed from “Green
Acres” for enrollment in this program is not subject to normal “Green Acres”
back-taxes. Subd. 3. Determination of value. (a) Provides that enrolled
land under an irrevocable covenant must be valued at 25 percent of the
average value of class 2b (rural vacant) land in the surrounding area. (b) Provides that enrolled land under a revocable covenant must be
valued at 75 percent of the average value of class 2b (rural vacant) land in
the surrounding area. Subd. 4. Separate determination of market
value and tax. Provides that the assessor
shall each year make a separate determination of the tax on the parcel based
on its “highest and best use” value. Subd. 5. Application and covenant
agreement. Provides that the owner/ applicant must
record a covenant agreement with the county recorder. Provides that if the covenant is revocable,
it must require a 4-year advance notice of termination, which may not be
given until the covenant has been in effect for at least 16 years. Provides that the covenant must be binding
on the owner or the owner’s successor, and that it runs with the land. Also provides that once a revocable
covenant has been terminated, the property may not be reenrolled unless sold
or transferred to a different owner. Subd. 6. Additional taxes. Provides that when a covenant is
terminated, the property shall be subject to back-taxes equal to the
difference between the tax based on the “highest and best use” value and the
tax based on the reduced value for the past seven years. Subd. 7.
Cross-compliance with agricultural chemical and water laws. Terminates program participation for a violation of agricultural chemical or water
protection laws occurring on the property.
Requires any deferred special assessments to be paid, plus back-taxes
equal to the tax benefits received over the last 7 years of enrollment. Prohibits reenrollment for a period of
three years. Subd. 8.
Lien. Provides that the additional taxes imposed
under subdivisions 6 and 7 constitute a lien on the property. Effective date: Provides that the bill
is effective for taxes payable in 2012 and thereafter. |
No comparable provision |
|
10
|
Applicability. Technical change relating to
disaster-damaged homes provision in section 12. |
No comparable provision |
|
11
|
Reassessments required. Technical change relating to
disaster-damaged homes provision in section 12. |
No comparable provision |
|
12
|
Disaster-damaged homes; partial valuation
exclusion.
Provides for a valuation exclusion for a home that: } sustained sufficient
damage in a disaster to reduce its value by at least $15,000, } was restored or rebuilt
by the end of the year after the disaster, } has a gross living area
after reconstruction that does not exceed 130 percent of its pre-disaster
gross living area, and } has an estimated market
value after reconstruction that exceeds its pre-disaster value by at least
$25,000. Provides that the
difference between the post-reconstruction value and the pre-disaster value
will be excluded in the first assessment year following reconstruction, and
one-half of the difference will be excluded in the second assessment year
following reconstruction. Requires the owner to
file an application for the valuation exclusion by January 2 of the year following
the year in which the restoration or reconstruction was substantially
completed. Effective for assessment
year 2009 and thereafter (extends application deadline to June 30, 2009, for
restoration or reconstruction occurring in 2008). |
No comparable provision |
|
13
|
General rule (new relative homestead
prohibition). Prohibits any new properties
from qualifying for relative homestead classification after July 1, 2009
(does not affect agricultural properties). |
No comparable provision |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 18. Utility property class rates. Increases the class rate that applies to personal property of an electric generation system to 2.8 percent, and the class rate that applies to personal property that is either part of a pipeline system that transports water, gas, crude oil, or petroleum or part of an electric transmission or distribution system, to 2.25 percent. Under current law, all utility personal property has a class rate of 2 percent. |
|
14
|
Class 4 (commercial-seasonal classification
for small inns). Extends the 4c property
classification to property containing 20 or fewer rental units, devoted to
temporary residential occupancy, and located in a city or township outside
the seven-county metropolitan area with a population of 2,500 or less. Subjects the property to a class rate of 1
percent on the first $500,000 of market value and 1.25 percent on the value
in excess of $500,000, and to the seasonal-recreational state general tax
rate. Under current law, this
property is classified as class 3a with class rates of 1.5 percent on the
first $150,000 of value and 2.0 percent on the value in excess of $150,000,
and is subject to the commercial-industrial state general tax rate. Effective for assessment
year 2009, taxes payable in 2010, and thereafter. For assessment year 2009, the January 15
application deadline is extended to July 1, 2009. |
Section 19, same, except Senate
language requires occupancy no more than 250 days in the year, and that the
city or town contains a portion of a state trail. The Senate language also includes property
used as a marina that is open to the public. |
|
15
|
Homestead of disabled veteran. Extends the time period from one year to
five years that the surviving spouse
of a deceased disabled veteran can continue to qualify for the disabled
veteran homestead market value exclusion, provided the spouse remains in the
house and does not remarry. Effective
for taxes payable in 2010 and thereafter. |
No comparable provision |
|
16
|
Computation of net property taxes. Deletes the bovine tuberculosis credit from
the list of property tax credits (the property tax credit is transformed to a
state grant program in article 13, section 2). |
No comparable provision. Senate bill modifies the bovine
tuberculosis property tax credit in article 4, sections 16 and 17. |
|
17
|
State general tax rate. Provides that in setting the rate of the state
general tax on commercial-industrial property for taxes payable in 2010, the
commissioner is to ignore the tax capacity of the airport property added to
the base in section 18. Provides that in following years, the tax
on the airport property will be “rolled-into” the base. |
Section 20. Senate bill freezes the rate of the state
general tax at the rate imposed for payable 2003. |
|
18
|
State general tax; airport exemption. Eliminates the exemption for metropolitan
airport commission property from the state general tax. This will subject property at the
Minneapolis St. Paul International Airport and the St. Paul airport (Holman
Field) to the state general tax. The
area of these airports will remain “detached” and the property on the grounds
will not be subject to city or school district property taxes. Effective date: property taxes payable
in 2010 |
Sections 20 and 21. Senate bill removes seasonal recreational
property from the state general tax. |
|
19
|
Contents of tax statements. Provides that the property tax statement
must not state or imply that property tax credits are paid by the state. |
No comparable provision |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Sections 26 and 27. Levy limit cross
references. Section 26 strikes a reference to levy limit
provisions that are repealed in section 61. Section 27 adds a reference to
2008 Minnesota Statutes to the levy categories required for the property tax
levy report. |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 28. Property tax installments. Increases from $50 to $250 the minimum property tax amount for which counties must allow payments in two installments. |
|
20
|
Publication corrected. Provides that if the county auditor discovers an
error in the delinquent tax list as published in the newspaper, the auditor
does not have to republish the entire list, but only the information that needs
to be corrected. (The other changes
are not substantive.) Effective the day
following final enactment. |
Section 29, same |
|
21
|
Apportionment of tax-forfeited land
proceeds to taxing districts. Authorizes counties to
use a portion of the proceeds from the sale or rental of tax-forfeited lands to replace all or a portion of their county
program aid or market value credit reimbursement cuts or unallotments. Provides that if a county board decides to
use some of these funds, they must pass a resolution within six months of the
actual aid or credit reimbursement loss.
The amount of the transfer from a county’s tax-forfeited fund to its
general fund cannot exceed the aid or credit reimbursement loss. Authority expires January 1, 2012. Effective the day following
final enactment. |
No comparable provision |
|
22
|
Senior citizen property tax deferral
program; qualifications. Makes two changes to the list of
qualifications for the senior citizen property tax deferral program: }
Changes the
age requirement so that at the time deferral is initially granted, only one
spouse must be at least 65 years old.
Requires the other spouse to be at least 62 years old. Under present law both spouses must be at
least 65 years old for a married couple to qualify for the deferral. }
Increases the
maximum household income allowable for program participation from the $60,000
under current law to $75,000. Effective July 1, 2009. |
No comparable provision |
|
23
|
Senior deferral; excess income
certification by homeowner. Increases the income level that triggers
the requirement for the homeowner to notify the commissioner of “excess
income” from $60,000 to $75,000. |
No comparable provision |
|
24
|
Senior deferral; resumption of eligibility. Changes
the income level that triggers eligibility for a homeowner to resume program
participation from income under $60,000 to income under $75,000. This applies to homeowners who become
ineligible due to having income over the limit, but are then allowed to
resume participation when their income falls below the maximum in a
subsequent year. |
No comparable provision |
|
25
|
Senior deferral; determination by
commissioner. Increases the maximum household income
level at which program participation is allowed from $60,000 to $75,000. |
No comparable provision |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 30. Airport authority. Permits airport authorities to exercise the municipal power of airport zoning. |
|
26
|
Special service districts; deadline for
establishing. Extends the sunset date for
establishing special service districts without special legislation from June
30, 2009, to June 30, 2013. (The
sunset of the general law does not affect districts established prior to the
sunset date.) |
Section 33, same |
|
|
|
Sections 34 and 35. Housing improvement areas. Provides that before establishing a housing improvement area, a city must provide full disclosure of public expenditures, including terms of financing for improvement area projects. If fees are imposed on housing units within the area on a basis other than tax capacity or square footage of the units, the council must make a finding that the alternative is more equitable. Fees imposed must meet the standard for benefits as special assessments and are subject to the same appeal processes. |
|
27
|
Housing improvement districts; deadline for
establishing. Extends the sunset date for
establishing housing improvement districts without special legislation from
June 30, 2009, to June 30, 2012. (The
sunset of the general law does not affect districts established prior to the
sunset date.) |
Section 36, same, except Senate
extends the date to June 30, 2013. |
|
28
|
Municipality; certain counties (abatement
authorization). Allows counties to use special
assessments to abate nuisances and to correct environmental, wetland, or land
use violations. This section, along
with the changes made in section 29, allow a county to clean-up nuisances
that are violations of environmental, wetland, or land use regulations, and
charge the owner for those costs.
Effective the day following final enactment. |
Section 37. Senate language is the same with respect to
abatements of nuisances, but does not include environmental, wetland, or land
use violations. |
|
29
|
Improvements authorized. Authorizes cities and counties to make
improvements for the purpose of correcting environmental, wetland, or land
use violations. Effective the day
following final enactment. |
No comparable provision |
|
30
|
Municipal street improvement districts. Subd. 1.
Definitions.
Defines “class of property” (classes 1 through 5 without regard to
subclasses, exempt property may be subject to fee as additional class); “governing body” (city council);
“improvements “(essentially any type of street improvement); “maintenance;”
“municipal street;” “municipality” (home rule charter or statutory city); and
“street improvement district.” Subd. 2. Authorization. Authorizes a city to establish municipal
street improvement districts to finance street improvements and maintenance
by apportioning the costs to properties in the district. When establishing boundaries, a city may
not exclude any class or parcel that is served by the municipal street on an
equal basis with other classes or parcels, except this limitation does not
apply to tax exempt property. Subd. 3. Uniformity. (a) Requires costs to be apportioned to all
parcels on a uniform basis within each class of property; separate methods
could be used for different classes of property (e.g., residential versus
commercial). (b) Requires that the method of
apportioning costs must not apportion costs to any class of property at a
ratio of more than 2 to 1, relative to rate for the property in any other
class. Provides the limit does not
apply to fees that municipality elects to impose on tax exempt property. Subd. 4. Adoption of plan. (a) Requires the city, before adopting a
street improvement ordinance or authorizing a fee, to (1) identify and
estimate costs for the proposed improvements for the life of the district;
(2) identify the location of the district, limiting included properties to
those that will be served by the improvements; and (3) specify how costs will
be apportioned. (b) Requires notice and a public
hearing. Notice must be given to all
affected landowners and must include how fees would be imposed and
illustrative examples of amount of fees for average parcels for each class of
property in district. Subd. 5. Use of fees. Requires a separate account for the fees
collected and that fees be used only for projects in the district and
identified in the plan. Subd. 6. Collection. (a) Permits collection
of fees on a monthly, quarterly or other basis. Provides that a governing body may collect
fees for a maximum of ten years, which is the maximum duration of a district. (b) Provides that fees that have remained unpaid for at least 30 days
as of October 15 of each year, may be certified for collection as property
taxes in the following year. Subd. 7. Notice; hearing. (a) Provides an
ordinance establishing a district cannot be adopted until a public hearing is
held. After adoption, a summary must
be sent to each property owner that would be subject to the fee. (b) Requires that mailing must include notice that owners subject to fee have
right to petition for referendum vote; and estimates of the fee that would be
imposed on owner’s parcel in the first year, and of the maximum annual fee
that would be imposed on the owner’s parcel during the duration of the
project. Subd. 8. Reverse referendum. Provides 35 percent of
the owners in the district can trigger a referendum on the ordinance by
filing objections within 45 days after the ordinance is adopted. The election will be conducted by mail
ballot and each parcel of property is entitled to one vote. Subd. 9. Not exclusive means of financing improvements. Provides that the city
may use other measures to pay the costs of local street improvements, except
that the city cannot also impose special assessments for the projects funded
with fees under this section and must recognize credits allowed in any
previously negotiated development agreements. |
No comparable provision |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 40. Duluth Seaway Port Authority levy. Provides that the Seaway Port Authority of Duluth is a special taxing district with the power to levy a property tax of up to 0.01813 percent of taxable market value. |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section
41. Implicit price deflator. Provides a definition for the implicit price
deflator to replace the definition that is repealed in the levy limit law. |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Sections 43 through 45. Levy limit cross references. Replaces references to the implicit price deflator used for miscellaneous levy limits provisions with the statutory reference in section 41. |
|
|
No comparable provision; except that the administrative auditor must
prepare a report on the feasibility of eliminating the lag (article 6,
section 37) |
Sections 46 and 47. Fiscal disparities lag. Modifies the fiscal disparities program that applies within the seven‑county metropolitan area. These sections eliminate the one‑year lag so that fiscal disparities distribution amounts would be based on current year tax rates. To accommodate these changes, deadlines for various stages of the property tax process are changed in order to provide sufficient time to obtain the current year data. These sections are effective beginning with taxes payable in 2014. |
|
31
|
Termination of eligibility (Metro Ag
preserves). Terminates participation
in the metro ag preserves program for
a violation of agricultural chemical or water protection laws. Requires any deferred special assessments
to be paid, plus back-taxes equal to five years of tax benefits
received. Does not affect the covenant
restricting use of the land. Prohibits
reenrollment for a period of three years.
Effective for taxes payable in 2011 and thereafter. |
No comparable provision |
|
32
|
Application date (Metro Ag preserves). Extends the deadline for initial
application to the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserve program from March 1 to
June 1 for taxes payable in the following year. Effective the day following final
enactment, except that in 2009 the application date is extended to August 1. |
No comparable provision |
|
|
H.F. 1298 (first engrossment), section 36 is the same and
repeals the referendum exemption for OPEB bonds. |
Section 48. Emergency debt certificates referendum. Provides that a referendum is not required for issuance of emergency debt certificates issued under section 49. |
|
|
Article 13, section 13. Similar, but coordinates issuance of
emergency debt certificates with special levies authorized in article 13,
section 7. |
Section 49. Emergency debt certificates. Authorizes the issuance of emergency debt certificates by a local government. It provides that, if any time during a fiscal year, the receipts of the local government are reasonably expected to be reduced below the amount provided in the local government's budget when the final property tax levy was certified, and the receipts are insufficient to meet the expenses for the fiscal year, the governing body may authorize and sell certificates of indebtedness. The certificates must mature within two years from the end of the fiscal year in which they were issued. The maximum principle amount of the certificates is limited to the expected reduction in receipts plus the cost of issuance of the certificate. The governing body is authorized to levy taxes for the payment of the debt service on the certificates; the certificates would not be included in the net debt limit of the local government. Local governments are defined to include: cities, towns, or counties. Receipts are defined to include the amounts scheduled to be received by the local government for the fiscal year from taxes, aid payments previously certified by the state, state reimbursement payments for property tax credits, and any other source. |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 50. Red River Watershed Management Board. Allows the Red River Watershed Management Board to conduct meetings at a public facility within the Red River basin or within a jurisdiction with which the board is authorized to cooperate. |
|
33
|
Extends date; emergency medical service
districts. Extends the date for
establishing emergency medical (EMS) services special taxing districts for
three additional years. |
Section 51. Senate bill removes the sunset on emergency
medical special service districts. |
|
34
|
Effective date. Clarifies that the change made to the
metropolitan area plat law in the 2008 omnibus tax law only affects land
platted after the 2008 omnibus tax law was passed. |
Section 52, same |
|
35
|
Effective date. Clarifies that the change made to the
non-metropolitan area plat law in the 2008 omnibus tax law only affects land
platted after the 2008 omnibus tax law was passed. |
Section 53, same |
|
36
|
Purpose: commissioner of revenue
guidance. States that the purpose
of section 1 is not to contract or
expand the definition of “institutions of purely public charity” but to
provide clear standards that can be applied uniformly to determine
eligibility for exemption from property taxation. Requires the commissioner of revenue to
prepare a bulletin providing guidance to assessors as to the commissioner’s
interpretation of section 2. |
Section 60, similar, Senate language
refers to “compelling factual reason” rather than “reasonable justification.” |
|
37
|
Report by administrative auditor. Requires the administrative auditor of the
fiscal disparities program (currently Anoka County), in cooperation with the
other metro county auditors, to study the feasibility of basing fiscal
disparities distributions on current year tax rates, and to report the
findings to the House and Senate Tax committees by February 1, 2011, along
with any recommendations for changes in the law that would be necessary to
implement the change. |
Section 59. Senate language requires a working model of
the metropolitan revenue system, and recommendations for implementing Senate
sections 46 and 47. Senate report is
due February 1, 2012. |
|
38
|
Minneapolis Convention Center; lease;
property tax exemption. Exempts property at the
Minneapolis Convention Center that is subject to a lease or use agreement
between the city of Minneapolis and a private entity for providing food and
beverage services. Effective for
assessment year 2009 and thereafter, for taxes payable in 2010 and thereafter |
No comparable provision |
|
39
|
Repealer.
Repeals the bovine tuberculosis credit, effective for taxes payable in
2010 and thereafter (the property tax credit is transformed to a state grant
program in article 13, section 1). |
No comparable provision; Senate
modifies the bovine tuberculosis property tax credit in article 15, sections
16 and 17. |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 54. Conservation management plans. Provides that the conservation management plans required for the Rural Preserve property tax program must be prepared according to guidance provided by the Board of Water and Soil Resources. The board must provide a training course for conservation plan writers. |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 55. Rural preserves. Strikes a limitation that not more than 50 percent of the acreage of an agricultural homestead can be class 2b property enrolled in rural preserves. |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 56. Cloquet Fire and Ambulance special taxing district. Authorizes the City of Cloquet and Perch Lake township to create a special taxing district for the purpose of providing fire and ambulance services throughout the district. Other adjoining municipalities are authorized to join the district with the approval of the member municipalities. The special taxing district is authorized to levy 0.2835 percent of taxable market value for taxes payable in 2010. |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 57. Property tax treatment of horse breeding and horse boarding properties. Requires the Commissioner of Revenue, in consultation with the Commissioner of Agriculture, to study the property tax treatment of properties used for horse breeding and horse boarding under current law. The commissioner is required to report to the Senate and House Tax Committees by February 1, 2010. The owner of property that had been classified as agricultural in 2008 based on its use for horse breeding or boarding may appeal its 2009 classification to the commissioner if the property's use has not substantially changed, and the commissioner must resolve the appeal by issuing a written order. |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 58. Disrupted access abatements. Allows municipalities to abate taxes on business property with a market value of $250,000 or less if a public transportation project has impeded access to the business for more than three months resulting in a loss of revenue to the business. |
|
|
Article 5, section 14 repeals
truth-in-taxation hearing requirements. |
Section 61. Repealer. Repeals: (a) Truth in Taxation hearing requirements; (b) levy limits applicable to county governments and cities over 2,500 population; and (c) the allocation of the statewide general levy between seasonal recreational and commercial‑industrial properties. |
|
Sec. |
Article 7: Aids and Credits |
Article
5: Aids and Credits |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
|
Residential homestead market value
credit. Reduces the maximum credit from $304 to
$300. Increases the phase-out rate
from $9 per $10,000 in value to $10 per $10,000 in value. These two changes have the effect of reducing
the value above which homes no longer qualify for any credit from $414,000 to
$375,000. |
No comparable provision |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2
|
Payment.
Provides that the reductions in city market value credit
reimbursements determined in section 6 for pay 2010 will
continue for reimbursements in pay 2011 and pay 2012. |
Section 1. The market value credit reductions for both
cities and counties are recalculated each year for 2010, 2011, and 2012. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3
|
Homeowner property tax refund. Expands
the current law homeowner property tax refund program (“circuit breaker”) by: } providing a 10 percent larger maximum refund for
all incomes } reducing the percentage of income threshold for
homeowners with incomes from $18,120 to $67,909 The maximum refund for refunds based on taxes payable
in 2010 will increase from $2,340 under current law to $2,570. (The maximums appearing in the statute are
in 2001 dollars; the amounts that will be in effect for payable 2010 are the
statutory amounts adjusted for inflation to 2010). The income threshold percentage for homeowners
with household income from $18,120 to $67,909 will decrease from the
percentages in current law (ranging from 2.1 percent to 3.2 percent) toward 2
percent. The threshold will equal 2
percent for homeowners with household income from $18,210 to $24,149, and
will increase for higher income brackets, reaching 3.0 percent for homeowners
with household income from $60,360 to $67,909. The table below shows the proposed thresholds
compared to the current law thresholds.
Homeowners in the affected income ranges will be
eligible for a refund if their property taxes exceed the new, lower
percentage thresholds of household income.
This will make more homeowners eligible, and will result in a larger
portion of property taxes qualifying for a refund for homeowners in that
income range who have property taxes in excess of the current law threshold
percentages. The maximum refund amounts and the income brackets
in the schedule will continue to be adjusted annually for inflation. |
No comparable provision |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
No comparable provision. |
Section 2. Targeted refund. Eliminates the appropriation for the targeted property tax refund. This refund is repealed in section 7. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4
|
City aid base. Provides an increase in the city aid base for four
years of $100,000 from Pay 2011 to Pay 2015, for a city located in the
metropolitan area with a 2006 population less than 2,000 and a population
growth rate of at least 200% between 1996 and 2006. The city of Mayer is the
only city that qualifies. Also provides for an
increase in the city aid base of $225,000 for aids payable in 2010 only for
the city of Coon Rapids. Coon Rapids
was specifically designated for a $450,000 payment in CY 2008, half of which
was lost through the Governor’s unallotment.
States that the payment under this paragraph cannot be reduced through
aid reduction or any future unallotment. |
Section 3. Senate bill provides aid adjustments for
Taylors Falls of $30,000 on the minimum and maximum, for 2010 only; Green
Isle of $150,000 for 2010 only; and St. Charles for $163,036 for 2010 and
2011 only. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5
|
City aid distribution. Provides that for Pay 2010 only a city’s LGA
amount is equal to its Pay 2009 certified amount minus the subtraction in
section 6. LGA will be based on the formula in Pay
2011 and thereafter. |
Senate bill retains distribution of aid
under the formula for each year. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Art.2, section 8. Provides for a
reduction in county program aid beginning in 2010 based on whether the county
imposes a local sales tax. |
Section 4. County program aid reductions. Provides that in 2010, 2011, and 2012, county program aid is reduced by 0.5 percent of the county's levy plus aid base for the previous year. If the aid reduction exceeds a county's program aid distribution, the excess is taken from the market value homestead credit reimbursement. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Section 6. Calculation of aid reductions. Defines the revenue base for aid reductions as the certified property tax levy for the previous year, plus certified taconite aids and local government aid for cities and county program aid for counties. The reduction percentages are 0.7 percent for cities and 0.5 percent for counties. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
6
|
2010 city aid. Reduces the Pay 2010 city LGA and market values
credit payments from the Pay 2009 certified amounts by an amount equal to
1.8889 percent of each city’s adjusted net tax capacity. The reduction is first taken from LGA
payments, and then, if necessary, from market value credit reimbursements.
States that the reduction cannot be applied to Coon Rapid’s onetime 2010 city
aid base adjustment. |
Section 5. Senate bill reduces city LGA and market
value credit reimbursements by 0.7 percent of the levy plus aid for aids
payable in 2010, 2011, and 2012. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
7
|
2009 city and county aid reductions. Reduces Pay 2009 city LGA and market value credit
payments from the Pay 2009 certified amounts by an amount equal to 1.2111
percent of each city’s adjusted net tax capacity. The reduction is first taken from LGA
payments, and then, if necessary, from market value credit reimbursements. Reduces Pay 2009 county program aid
payments from the Pay 2009 certified amounts by an amount equal to 0.2308
percent of each county’s adjusted net tax capacity. |
No comparable provision |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
8
|
Cities.
Adjusts the appropriation limit on city LGA payments. The Pay 2010 payments are equal to the 2009
payments less the adjustments in section 6, plus a slight
adjustment to accommodate the additional aid to Coon Rapids in section 4. For Pay 2011 and thereafter, the total LGA
appropriation is equal to the original appropriation for aids certified for
2009. |
No comparable provision |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
9
|
Appropriation; fiscal stabilization
account. Appropriates $6.14 million
from the fiscal stabilization account in the federal fund to the commissioner
of revenue to pay a portion of the city LGA in calendar year 2009. |
No comparable provision |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
10
|
Repealer.
Repeals the appropriation increases for LGA and CPA of 2 percent in
Pay 2010 and another 4 percent in Pay 2011. |
No comparable provision |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Section 7. Repealer. Repeals M.S. 290A.04, subd 2h, the targeted refund and M.S. 477A.16, utility transition aid. |
|
Sec. |
Article 8: Seasonal Recreational Property Tax Deferral Program |
|
|
1
|
Seasonal recreational property tax deferral
program. Establishes the “seasonal recreational
property tax deferral program” (sections 2 to 9). |
Senate has no comparable provisions |
|
2
|
Terms. Subd. 1. Terms.
Defines the
terms used in this section. Subd. 2.
Primary property owner. “Primary property owner” means a person (1)
who has been the owner, or one of the owners, of the eligible property for at
least 15 years prior to filing the application to be in the program; and (2)
applies for the deferral of the property taxes. Subd. 3. Secondary property owner. “Secondary property owner” means any person, other than the primary
property owner, who has been an owner of the eligible property for at least
15 years prior to the year the initial application is filed for deferral of property
taxes. Subd. 4.
Eligible property. “Eligible property” means a parcel of property or
contiguous parcels of property under the same ownership and classified as
noncommercial seasonal residential recreational property (i.e., cabins). Subd. 5. Base property tax amount. “Base property tax amount” means the total property taxes levied by all
taxing jurisdictions, including special assessments, on the eligible property
in the year prior to the year that the initial application is approved and
payable in the year of that application. Subd. 6.
Special assessments. “Special assessments” mean any assessment,
fee, or other change that may be made by law, and that appears on the
property tax statement for the property for collection under the laws and
enforcement of real estate taxes. Subd. 7. Commissioner. “Commissioner” means the commissioner of revenue. |
|
|
3
|
Qualifications for deferral. Defines
the criteria needed for a property to qualify for deferral: (1) the property must have been owned by the
primary owner for at least 15 years prior to enrolling in the deferral
program. (2) there can be no state or federal tax liens or
judgment liens on the property; (3) there can be no mortgages or other liens on
the property except for those subject to the credit limits under clause (4);
and (4) the total amount of secured debt on the
property, including mortgages and other liens, delinquent special
assessments, and delinquent property taxes, but not including the current
year’s property taxes, may not exceed 60 percent of the property’s estimated
market value. |
|
|
4
|
Application for deferral. Subdivision 1. Initial application. (a)
Requires an owner of a qualified property to file an application on or before
July 1 of any year in order for property taxes payable in the forthcoming
year to qualify for deferral. The
application must include: (1) the name, address and social security number of the primary owner
and any secondary owners; (2) a copy of the current year’s property tax statement; (3) the initial year of ownership of the primary owner and any
secondary owners; (4) information on all loans secured by mortgages or other liens on the
property; and (5) the signature of the primary owner and all other owners, stating
that they agree to having the property enrolled in the program. The application must state that program participation is voluntary,
including authorization for the annual deferred amount. Provides that the deferred tax amount is
public data. (b) Allows the commissioner of revenue to ask for a report by a
licensed abstracter in the case of abstract property seeking enrollment in
the deferral program. Subd. 2.
Approval; recording. Requires the commissioner of revenue to
notify applicants of enrollment prior to December 1 for taxes payable in the
following year, and to file a notice of qualification for deferral with the
county recorder. Subd. 3. Penalty for failure; investigations. Requires the commissioner to assess a
penalty equal to 20 percent of the deferred tax in the case of a false
application, or 50 percent in the case of the taxpayer knowingly filing a
false application. Subd. 4.
Annual certification to commissioner. Requires the primary property
owner to certify annually by July 1 that the property continues to qualify
for the program. Requires that if the
primary owner has died or has transferred the property, the primary owner’s
spouse or a secondary owner may make the certification, and in that case that
person will become the primary owner.
Provides that if neither the primary owner, the primary owner’s spouse
nor a secondary owner are eligible to file the annual certification, the
property’s participation in the program will terminate and payment of the
deferred taxes must be made. Subd. 5. Annual notice to primary owner. Requires the commissioner of revenue to
annually notify the primary owner of the total amount of deferred taxes for
each participating property. |
|
|
5
|
Deferred property tax amount. Subd. 1. Calculation of deferred property tax
amount. Provides that the deferred tax amount for a
qualifying property each year is 50 percent of the amount by which the
current year’s property tax (including special assessments) exceeds the
property taxes in the base year (year of application). Provides that any tax attributable to
improvements made to the property since the base year are not subject to
deferral. Also provides that the
deferred tax amount is to be shown on the tax statement. Subd. 2.
Certification to commissioner. Provides that the county auditor shall
annually by April 15 certify the amount of deferred taxes to the commissioner
of revenue for each qualifying property. Subd. 3. Limitation on amount of deferred taxes. Provides that the total amount of deferred
taxes on a property, when added to any unpaid special assessments and/or
property taxes and the balance owed on any mortgages at the time of
application and the amount of other secured liens at the time of application,
must not exceed 60 percent of the property’s estimated market value. |
|
|
6
|
Lien; deferred portion. (a)
Provides that interest on the deferred taxes will accrue at a rate not to
exceed two percent more than the interest rate on deferred taxes under the
senior deferral program in chapter 290B. (b) Provides that the deferred taxes become a lien
on the property. Contains standard
language pertaining to what happens when the property taxes are not paid on
the property participating in the program. |
|
|
7
|
Termination of deferral; payment of
deferred taxes. Subdivision 1. Termination. (a)
Provides for program termination whenever: (1) the eligible property is transferred to someone other than the
primary owner’s spouse or a secondary owner; (2) the primary owner dies, or in the case of a married couple both spouses
die, provided that there is not a secondary owner eligible to become a
primary owner; (3) the owners notify the commissioner of revenue that they no longer
wish to participate in the program; or (4) the property no longer qualifies under section 3. (b) Provides that a property is not terminated from the program just
because no taxes are deferred in any given year. (c) Provides that if an eligible property becomes the homestead of one
of the owners, and if the homeowner qualifies for the senior deferral
program, the deferred tax under the seasonal-recreational deferral program
will be rolled-over to the senior deferral program. Subd. 2.
Payment upon termination. Provides that the deferred taxes become due
and payable within 90 days of termination if the primary owner dies or
transfers the property, or within one year if the owners opt-out of the
program or if the property ceases to remain eligible. |
|
|
8
|
State reimbursement. Provides
that the state will pay the deferred tax amount to each county treasurer by
August 31 of each taxes payable year.
The county treasurer shall distribute the dollars as part of the
regular October settlement.
Appropriates to the commissioner of revenue annually a sum sufficient
to pay the deferred tax amounts. |
|
|
9
|
Effective date. Provides
that sections 1 to 8 are effective for applications filed July 1,
2009, and thereafter. |
|
|
Sec. |
Article 9: Special Taxes |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
|
Liquor gross receipts tax. Increases the rate on the retail gross receipt tax
on the sales of alcoholic beverages from 2.5 percent to 5 percent. Effective date: July 1, 2009 |
No comparable provision |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2
|
Definition of moist snuff. Modifies
the definition of tobacco products under the excise tax to explicitly refer
to moist snuff. |
No comparable provision |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3
|
Cigarette excise tax rate. Increases the cigarette excise tax rate
from 48 cents/pack of 20 to $1.02 cents.
In combination with the Health Impact Fee of 75 cents per pack this
will raise the total tax/fee burden to $1.77 (excluding the sales tax). Effective date: July 1, 2009 |
No comparable provision |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4
|
Tobacco products rate. Provides
a separate tobacco products excise tax for moist snuff equal to $.91 per
ounce. The health impact fee doubles
this rate, yielding a combined tax and fee rate for moist snuff of $1.82 per
ounce. The tax on fractions of an
ounce would be computed proportionately, but rounded up to the nearest tenth
of a percent. A combined minimum tax and fee of $2.18 per
container of snuff would apply. This
is the equivalent of a tax on a 1.2-ounce can of snuff. Smaller cans or other containers would pay
this minimum amount (i.e., the tax would be computed as if they weighed 1.2
ounces). All other tobacco products (chewing tobacco, dry
snuff, cigars, and pipe tobacco) would continue to be taxed at 70 percent of
the wholesale price. Effective date: July 1, 2009, but does not apply product in
the inventory |
No comparable provision |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5
|
Use tax. Makes a conforming change in
the tobacco products use tax rate to be consistent with the changes in
section 4. |
No comparable provision |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
6
|
Inflation adjustment. Annually
adjusts the excise tax rate applied to moist snuff for inflation. Effective date: Calendar
year 2012 |
No comparable provision |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
7
|
Alcoholic beverage excise tax rates. Increases the rates under the alcohol
beverage excise rates by the amounts shown in the table. These increases approximate 1 cent per
drink for wine and cider and 3 cents for distilled spirits.
|
No comparable provision |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
8
|
Beer tax.
Increases
the rate of the beer tax, as shown in the table. These increases approximate 1 cent per
drink.
This section also
proportionately increases the dollar amounts of the brewers’ credit to
reflect the higher tax rates. |
No comparable provision |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
9
|
Floor stocks tax. Imposes a floor stocks tax on cigarettes
equal to the $.54 increase under section 3 for the amount of product
in inventory on July 1, 2009. This tax
is due by July 15th with the return to be filed by August 14,
2009. Effective date: July 1, 2009 |
No comparable provision |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
10
|
Adjustment of cigarette sales tax rate. Sets the cigarette sales tax rate at 36.8,
effective on July 1, 2009. This rate
would be in effect for the period from July 1, 2009 through July 31, 2010 and
is set to reflect combined effects of the DOR price survey (33 cents per
pack) and the excise tax increase under section 3’s tax increase (3.8
cents per pack, given the minimum markup of 8 percent under the unfair
cigarette sales act). The normal
adjustment, scheduled for August 1, 2009, would not take effect and annual
adjustments would resume on August 1, 2010. Effective date: Day following final enactment |
No comparable provision |
|
Sec. |
Article 10: Sales and Use Tax |
Article
3: Sales and Excise Taxes |
|
1
|
Proof of sales tax payments; used
snowmobiles. Requires all purchasers
of a used snowmobile to either provide proof that the sales tax has been paid
or provide the necessary information so the sales tax can be calculated and
paid at the time that the purchaser registers the snowmobile. Effective for sales and purchases made
after June 30, 2009. |
No comparable provision |
|
2
|
Proof of sales tax payments; all-terrain
vehicles. Requires all purchasers
of a used all-terrain vehicle to either provide proof that the sales tax has
been paid or provide the necessary information so the sales tax can be
calculated and paid at the time that the purchaser applies for transfer of
the registration. Effective for sales
and purchases made after June 30, 2009. |
No comparable provision |
|
3
|
Proof of sales tax payments; used
boats. Requires all purchasers of a used boat to
either provide proof that the sales tax has been paid or provide the
necessary information so the sales tax can be calculated and paid at the time
that the purchaser applies for a boat license. Effective for sales and purchases made
after June 30, 2009. |
No comparable provision |
|
4
|
Notification requirements. Requires the Department of Revenue to
establish a “listserv” to electronically notify persons holding a sales tax
permit of changes in the sales tax law and the issuance of new rules,
notices, and fact sheets or similar information related to sales tax. The requirement only applies if the permit
holder has provided an email address.
A permit holder can request to not be included in the notification. The notification must begin by December 31,
2009. |
No comparable provision |
|
5
|
Return required. Allows a person prohibited due to religious
beliefs from using electronics to file a sales tax return by mail without
additional fees. Effective for returns
filed after June 30, 2009. |
No comparable provision |
|
6
|
Sales and use tax (remittance). Allows a person prohibited due to religious
beliefs from using electronics to remit sales taxes by mail without
additional fees. The payment must be
postmarked at least two business days before the day it is due. Effective for sales taxes remitted after
June 30, 2009. |
No comparable provision |
|
7
|
Sales and purchase. Adds specified digital products and other
digital products to the definition of taxable sales. Paragraph (l) adds the right to access or
use digital products for a consideration, whether on a temporary or permanent
basis, to the definition of a taxable sale.
|
No comparable provision |
|
8
|
Retail sale. Adds a number of cross-references to specified
digital products and other digital products to the existing definition of
retail sales. Clarifies that retail
sales includes temporary access to specified digital products or other
digital products. Clarifies that the
purchase of a digital code to access digital products is retail sales and
subsequent access to digital products using the code are not retail sales.
States that purchase of digital music by a person that provides music through
a juke box or similar device is a sale for resale. |
No comparable provision |
|
9
|
Storage.
Adds
a cross-reference to specified digital products and other digital products to
the existing definition of storage. |
No comparable provision |
|
10
|
Use.
Adds
a cross-reference to specified digital products and other digital products to
the existing definition of use. |
No comparable provision |
|
11
|
Tangible personal property. Clarifies that the electronic delivery of computer
software is still included in the definition of tangible personal property
although other digital products are not tangible personal property. |
No comparable provision |
|
12
|
Lease or rental. Adds a cross-reference to specified digital
products and other digital products to the existing definition of lease or
rental. |
No comparable provision |
|
13
|
Delivered electronically. Clarifies that computer
software is not “delivered electronically” and does apply to computer software
even if the purchaser only has access to the software online. |
No comparable provision |
|
14
|
Normal course of business. Adds a cross-reference to specified digital
products and other digital products to the existing definition of normal
course of business. |
No comparable provision |
|
15
|
Bundled transaction. Adds a cross-reference to specified digital
products and other digital products to the existing law related to bundled
transactions. |
No comparable provision |
|
16
|
Digital audio visual work. Defines “digital audio visual work” using the
SSUTA required definition and expands on it to list specific items included
such as movies, music videos, and live events, and items that are excluded
such as video greeting cards, which are included in the definition of “other
digital products.” Includes digital
codes or subscriptions used to access these works. |
No comparable provision |
|
17
|
Digital audio work. Defines “digital audio work” using the SSUTA
required definition and expands on it to list specific items included such as
music, voice recordings, and ring tones, and items excluded such as audio
greeting cards which are included in the definition of “other digital
products.” Includes digital codes or
subscriptions used to access these works. |
No comparable provision |
|
18
|
Digital book. Defines “digital book” using the SSUTA required
definition and expands on it to list specific items included such as fiction,
non-fiction, and short stories, and items excluded such as magazines and
newspapers. Includes digital codes or subscriptions
used to access these works. |
No comparable provision |
|
19
|
Digital code. Defines “digital code” as a code that allows a
purchaser to access digital products, regardless of how the code is
transmitted to the purchaser. Digital
codes do not include gift card or gift certificates. |
No comparable provision |
|
20
|
Specified digital products. Defined as the digital products currently defined
in the SSUTA. These include digital
audio-visual works, digital audio works, and digital books. |
No comparable provision |
|
21
|
Transferred electronically. Adopts the SSUTA definition of “transferred
electronically” and clarifies that the purchaser does not have to be given a
copy of the product; they just need to have access to the digital product. |
No comparable provision |
|
22
|
Other digital products. Defines other digital products for sales tax
purposes to be digital greeting cards, digital artwork, and video or
electronic games. These items are
currently taxable in Minnesota in tangible form but SSUTA has currently not
adopted definitions for these products.
|
No comparable provision |
|
23
|
Constitutionally required additional sales
tax. Adds a subdivision with the 0.375 percent
rate increase required under the constitution to the sales tax rate statute
so that the total state rate is easily identified. |
No comparable provision |
|
24
|
Use tax imposed; rates. Adds a number of cross-references to specified
digital products and other digital products to the existing law related to
use tax. |
No comparable provision |
|
25
|
Fee imposed (short term motor vehicle
rental). Exempts nonprofit car
sharing organizations from the special car rental fee that applies in lieu of
the motor vehicle registration tax and makes them subject to the motor
vehicle registration tax. Only
nonprofit corporation that charges persons or group oh an hourly basis to use
the vehicles qualify and they must } Use unstaffed self-service
locations that are available any time of the day; } Provide vehicle
maintenance, insurance, and fuel; and } Not provide discounts or
lower rates for increased use. |
Article 3, section 1, identical |
|
26
|
Definitions (retailer in this state). Adds a cross-reference to specified digital
products and other digital products to the existing definition of a “retailer
maintaining a place of business in this state.” |
No comparable provision |
|
27
|
Solicitor. Defines
a “solicitor” as a person who enters into a contract to directly or
indirectly refer potential customers to a business or the Web site of the
business. States that a business is
presumed to have a solicitor in this state, and therefore has a duty to
collect the state sales tax, if it has at least $10,000 annually of sales
into Minnesota based on referrals from residents of this state or businesses
with a physical presence in the state.
Provides for a rebuttal of that presumption. Effective beginning with sales made after
June 30, 2009. |
Article 3, section 2, identical |
|
28
|
Sales tax exemption; home heating fuels. Currently, natural gas and electricity for
residential heating are exempt from the sales tax for the months of November
through April. Paragraph (a) limits
the exemptions for natural gas to the first 850 hundred cubic feet (CCF) per
residential unit during the 6 month period and the exemption for electricity
to the first 5,750 kilo-watt hours per dwelling unit during the six-month
period. Effective for sales and
purchases made after June 30, 2009. In paragraph (b) the
current exemption for all natural gas or electricity used for home
heating during the months of October
through April is retained for any customer receiving aid from a low income
home energy assistance program (LIHEAP). |
No comparable provision |
|
29
|
Occasional sales. Excludes
the sale of a used snowmobile, all-terrain vehicle, or boat from the isolated
and occasional sale exemption. Effective for sales and purchases made after June
30, 2009. Also adds a cross-reference
to specified digital products and other digital products to the existing
exemption for occasional sales.
Effective for sales and purchases after June 30, 2009. |
No comparable provision |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 3. Upfront sales tax exemption ‑ capital equipment. Amends Minn. St. § 297A.68, subdivision 5. This is part of the changes required to give an upfront sales tax exemption for capital equipment. |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 4. Sales tax exemption-meat processing facility. Adds a subdivision to Minnesota Statutes, section 297A.71, providing a sales tax exemption for construction materials related to a meat processing facility built to replace one destroyed by a fire this year and employed more than 200 people. The refunds issued for this exemption will be refunded after June 30, 2011. |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 5. Sales tax exemptions. Amends Minn. St. § 297A.75, subdivision 1, related to sales tax collection for exempt items. This is part of the changes required to give an upfront stales tax exemption for capital equipment, and one exemption for a meat processing facility in section 4. |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 6. Sales tax ‑ refunds of exempt items. Amends Minn. St. § 297A.75, subdivision 2, related to refunds of exempt items. Also part of the upfront sales tax exemption for capital equipment, and one exemption for a meat processing facility in section 4. |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 7. Sales tax refund applications. Amends Minn. St. § 297A.75, subdivision 3, related to application for refunds of exempt items. Final part of the upfront sales tax exemption for capital equipment. |
|
30
|
Quarterly transfer of sales tax on motor
vehicle leases. Eliminates the
dedication of revenues from the sales tax on motor vehicle leases to the
lower income motor fuels credit. This
credit is repealed in article 1. The
dedicated portion of the revenue from the sales tax on these leases will now
be split 50-50 between the greater Minnesota transit account and the county
state-aid highway fund. Allows the
commissioner to estimate the revenue collected from the sales tax on motor
vehicle leases and deposit into those accounts on a quarterly basis. Effective July 1, 2009. |
No comparable provision |
|
31
|
Commissioner’s discretion. Adds a cross-reference to specified digital
products and other digital products to the existing law regarding whom the
commissioner regards as a retailer. |
No comparable provision |
|
32
|
Deposit of revenues. Clarifies that the statutorily dedicated
portions of the current sales tax do not include any revenue raised by the
imposition of the constitutionally dedicated 0.375 percent tax increase. The main dedications are revenues from
motor vehicle leases to transportation, and the revenue from the in lieu tax
on lottery tickets. |
No comparable provision |
|
33
|
Use tax.
Adds
a cross-reference to specified digital products and other digital products to
the existing local sales tax law. |
No comparable provision |
|
34
|
Rate (motor vehicle sales). Removes the link on tax rates between the general
sales tax and the motor vehicle sales tax.
The motor vehicles sales tax rate will remain at 6.5 percent. |
No comparable provision |
|
35
|
Use of property ( Minneapolis local sales
tax.) Allows the city of Minneapolis to use
revenues from their local sales tax to pay for the purposes in section 36. Deletes obsolete language allowing the city
to impose the local tax on a different tax base then the one used for the
state tax |
No comparable provision |
|
36
|
Minneapolis city services and neighborhood
projects. Allows the city to use
any local sales tax revenues not needed to pay bonds to: } Fund city services in
2009 and 2010, up to an amount equal to the city’s aid losses in 2008, 2009,
and 2010; and } Fund neighborhood
projects in 2011 and thereafter |
No comparable provision |
|
37
|
Minneapolis downtown taxing area. Modifies
the area in which the special Minneapolis convention center tax applies to
exclude properties that are zoned under chapter 546 of the Minneapolis zoning
code (this is the chapter that zones residential uses) and contain a
restaurant or bar. Effective for sales
after July 31, 2012, and provides that the taxes collected between July 1,
2009, and July 31, 2012, from that area shall be deposited in the state
general fund to recover taxes paid to the city that the state never
collected. |
Article 3, section 8, same provision
with technical language difference. |
|
38
|
Mankato local
sales tax - use of revenues. Amends the allowed uses of the Mankato
local sales tax revenue by deleting the requirement that the performing arts
center and a women’s hockey arena must be attached to the Mankato Civic
Center. The amount allowed to be
raised by the local sales tax remains unchanged. |
Article 3, section 9, identical |
|
39
|
St. Paul local sales tax - use of
revenues. Extends the city of St.
Paul’s authority to use up to $3.5 million annually of its sales tax revenue
to pay for bonds for capital projects related to cultural and economic
development projects. Currently this
authority ends after this year; the bill extends the authority to 2014. |
Article 3, section 10, identical |
|
40
|
St. Paul local sales tax - unexpended funds
and interest. Limits the use of
interest on loan repayments and returned funds from revenues allocated to the
residential, cultural, commercial, and economic development capital projects
to other capital projects authorized under the same provision. |
Article 3, section 11, identical |
|
41
|
Little Falls food and beverage tax. Allows the
city of Little Falls to extend its local food and beverage tax for an
additional 15 years and allows it to expand the tax base to include alcoholic
as well as non-alcoholic beverages. |
No comparable provision |
|
42
|
St. Paul local sales tax -
requirement. Amends the citizen
review process for the expenditure of St. Paul sales tax revenues dedicated
to neighborhood investments to explicitly state that the review process must
be open, fair, and competitive and that all proposals must be reviewed before
the panel makes a proposal to the city council. |
Article 3, section 12, identical |
|
43
|
Rochester lodging tax. Increases the existing Rochester lodging tax of 1
percent by another 1 percent. The
revenues from the increased tax must be used to pay for renovation and expansion of the Mayo Civic
Center Complex and related bonds. The tax may only be increased if the state
appropriates money for this project and the city approves a total financing
package. The authority for the increased tax expires when
revenues raised are sufficient to fund the project and pay associated bonds,
or earlier if the city desires. |
Article 3, section 13, similar
provision, but no requirement for the state to appropriate new money, money
cannot be used for parking, and contains a reference to the design grant from
2008 in expiration date. |
|
44
|
Owatonna local
sales tax – use of revenues. Modifies the allowed uses of revenue generated by
the city of Owatonna’s local sales tax. Currently the city is allowed to use up to
$4.5 million for transportation projects listed in the 2004 U.S. Highway
14-Owatonna Beltline study. This
allows the city to use up to $1.5 million of the $4.5 million for another
road project in the city. The change
in use would not require a local referendum. The amount allowed to be raised by the local
sales tax remains unchanged. |
Article 3, section 14, identical |
|
45
|
Mankato local restaurant and entertainment taxes - use of revenues. Makes a conforming change to the change in section 38. |
Article 13, section 15, identical |
|
46
|
Sales and local lodging taxes collection;
Department of Revenue. Requires the Department of Revenue to make efforts to collect any
unpaid sales and local lodging taxes from online travel companies on the
total rent paid for the lodging.
Currently these travel companies are paying taxes on the amount they
pay to the hotel or motel for the right to make reservations on behalf of
their customers. The companies then
re-sell the use of these rooms to their customers at a higher rate. No taxes are currently being paid on the
difference between the travel company’s cost and the final amount paid by the
customer. A city must specifically
request that the Department take action to collect the lost revenue from the
lodging tax on their behalf and the commissioner of revenue may request that
the attorney general conduct legal proceedings to enforce collection of this
underpaid tax. |
No comparable provision |
|
47
|
Rochester food and beverage tax. Allows the city of Rochester to impose a food and beverage tax of 1 percent. The revenues from the tax must be used to pay for renovation and expansion of the Mayo Civic
Center Complex and related bonds. The
tax may only be imposed if the state appropriates money for this project and
the city approves a total financing package. The tax
expires when revenues raised are sufficient to fund the project and pay
associated bonds, or earlier if the city desires. |
Article 3, section 18, similar
provisions with same differences as Article 3, section 13. |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 16. Cook County local sales tax revenue uses. Eliminates the use for construction and improvement of a county community center and recreation area and replaces it with authority to use it for construction or additions to multiple community centers and public recreation areas. Also adds construction and improvement of a high speed communications infrastructure (Internet) and construction and improvement of a district energy plant for public facilities in Grand Marais to the allowed uses. Increases the amount of revenue that the county can issue for authorized projects from $14 million to $20 million. |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 17. Cook County bond limits. Increases the amount of bonds that Cook County can issue for authorized projects from $14 million to $20 million. The extra authority may delay the expiration date for the tax since the tax does not expire until the later of (1) 20 years, or (2) when revenues are sufficient to repay the bonds. |
|
48
|
Repealer.
Repeals
the existing definition of ring tone, which is now included in the definition
of digital audio works. |
No comparable provision |
|
Sec. |
Article 11: Local Development |
Article
6: Local Development |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
|
TIF for tourism projects. Expands the authority to use economic
development TIF districts for tourism projects to include counties in Region
7E. This will add the counties of
Chisago, Isanti, Mille Lacs, Kanabec, and Pine to those now allowed to use
this authority. To qualify, projects
must also be located in counties with incomes that are no more than 85
percent of the state median income and can not be in a city with a population
of over 20,000. The following counties
are located in regions that now qualify to use the authority:
|
Section 4, same |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2
|
TIF plan requirement. Makes the following changes in the required
contents of the TIF plan: }
Eliminates the requirement that the TIF plan include references to the
portion of the development or redevelopment that will be financed with
non-TIF revenues. }
Limits the
total authorized costs to an estimate of the increments that will be
generated by the expected development of the district. Effective date: TIF plans approved after June 30, 2009 |
Section 5, similar, but also
eliminates the requirement of identification of other expected developments
within the project. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3
|
TIF annual financial reporting. Eliminates references in the annual TIF
financial report to non-TIF funds, such as special assessments, grants, and
transfers from other funds. References
to public park and social and recreational facilities are eliminated, since
these are no longer purposes for which increments generally may be spent. References to revenue bonds and
pay-as-you-go notes are combined, since these are legally indistinguishable. Effective date: TIF reports due after December 31, 2009 |
Section 6, same |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4
|
TIF administrative costs. Clarifies that the county’s cost of
administration are not counted against the 10-percent limit on TIF
administrative expenses. Effective date: All districts, regardless of when the request for
certification was made |
Section 9, same |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5
|
TIF transfers to offset state aid
reductions. Allows cities with aid reductions to
transfer surplus or excess tax increments to their general funds to offset
state aid cuts. To use this authority,
the development authority (HRA, EDA, etc.) must authorize the transfer by resolution
on the request of the city. Permitted amount of transfer. The transfer cannot exceed the lesser of: 1.
The amount of increment the district has available, less the amount the
district is obligated to pay in bonds or binding contracts during the
calendar year and the next six months plus any transfers to offset deficits
caused by the 1997 – 2001 property tax changes; or 2.
The cuts in state aids and credits that the city experiences for the
calendar year. This could include
reductions in LGA and market value credit reimbursements, whether as a result
of an unallotment or a legislatively enacted reduction. It does not include aid cuts that the city
opts to levy back under the special levy for unallotments. Effect of election on future use of TIF
district’s increments. If the city and development
authority elect to use this authority, they may only use increments from the
TIF district in the future for the following purposes: } Paying bonds and
contracts that were outstanding when the election was made, } Making transfers to
other districts to offset deficits caused by the 1997 – 2001 property tax
changes, } Paying its
administrative expenses, } Making the transfers to
the general fund permitted by the bill. In other words, the TIF
district could no longer be used to finance new developments or improvements. Cities with more 12
percent or more of their tax capacity in TIF would not be permitted to use
this authority. Expiration. The
authority to make these transfers expires on December 31, 2010. |
No comparable provision |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
6
|
Four-year knock-down rule. Extends the four-year knockdown rule to six years
for TIF districts that were certified between January 1, 2005, and July 1,
2010. The knockdown rule requires development activity to take place on a
parcel (qualifying activities include the installation of public
infrastructure improvements adjacent to the parcel) within four years after
certification. Failing this, the
parcel is dropped from the TIF district and is only recertified (with its
then tax value) as part of the district when the requisite activity takes
place. |
No comparable provision |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
7
|
Additional pooling for housing. Expands the permitted purposes for using the
additional pooling percentage for housing to include purposes that mirror the
permitted uses of increments for special law housing replacement
districts. Present law allows a city
to increase the permitted pooling percentages (i.e., the amount of a TIF
district’s increment that may be spent outside of the area of the TIF
district) by 10 percentage points and to use the money for low-income housing
(i.e., housing that meets the federal law tests for occupancy by low-income
families and rent affordability). This
section expands those purposes to allow use for purposes taken from the
special laws allowing housing replacement districts. This would allow use for owner-occupied
housing that does not exceed 150 percent of the average market value of
housing in the city. The money could
be used to acquire the houses, demolish or relocate them, rehab them, do site
preparation, or pollution cleanup. To
qualify, the sites or housing must meet one of the following conditions: }
Be a one to
four unit dwelling that has been vacant for at least three months }
Be a one to
four unit dwelling that is structurally substandard }
Be in
foreclosure }
Consist of vacant
land, if the parcel would be used to develop or redevelop housing meeting one
of the other three conditions This authority expires on December 31, 2015. Effective date: Applies to
all TIF districts subject to the pooling rules |
Section 10 authorizes expenditure of tax increments from districts located within transit improvement areas outside of the district but within the transit improvement area to support its activities. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
8
|
Five-year rule. Extends the five-year rule to eight years for
districts certified on or after January 1, 2004, and before July 1,
2010. The five-year rule requires the
development authority to complete the district’s in-district activities
within five years after certification of the district. |
Section 11, similar, but extends to
ten years for redevelopment and renewal and renovation districts certified
between July 1, 2003, and April 20, 2009.
States purpose of accommodating delays in development activities due
to economic circumstances. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
9
|
Interfund loans. Provides that the interest rates on
interfund loans are set at the time when the loans are authorized, not when
they are made. Effective date: Interfund loans made after June 30, 2009 |
Section 12, same |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
10
|
Brooklyn Park, housing replacement
authority. Provides a definition of
“authority” for the city of Brooklyn Park’s exercise of housing replacement
district authority. Section 11 grants Brooklyn Park
housing replacement district authority. Effective date: Final enactment |
Section 14, same |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
11
|
Housing replacement districts. Grants the city of Brooklyn Park authority
to exercise housing replacement district powers. Increases from 50 to 100
the maximum number of parcels for housing replacement districts, and
eliminates annual limits on parcels added to districts, as well as ten-year
overall limit. Effective date: Final enactment |
Section 15, authorizes Brooklyn Park
to exercise housing replacement district powers, but does not increase
maximum number of parcels or annual limit on parcels. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
12
|
Oakdale TIF. Corrects
an error in the 2008 special TIF law for the city of Oakdale. It adds references to property tax PINs for
two of the parcels, which the city intended to include in one of the TIF
districts, but which were not included in the 2008 law. Effective date: Upon local approval by the city of Oakdale. |
Section 20, same |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
13
|
South St. Paul; TIF. Authorizes the city of South St. Paul to
establish a new redevelopment TIF district with the same area and original
tax capacity as its Concord Street TIF district, a pre-1979 TIF
district. As a condition for
establishing the district, the city must enter an agreement with Dakota
County providing for transfer of the increment attributable to the county’s
tax rate to the county. The increments
from the district would be used to pay the convention center bonds. The district terminates in 2024. Because this is a new
district, it would contribute to the fiscal disparities pool, unlike pre-1979
HRA districts. To prevent the district
from affecting local government aid, county program aid, or school aid the
captured net tax capacity of the district is included in adjusted net tax
capacity for those programs. |
Section 30, similar, except authorizes
new district to collect and use second half 2009 tax increments from existing
Concord Street TIF district for purposes of the new district. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
14
|
City of Minnetonka; TIF. Authorizes the city of Minnetonka to extend
the Glenhaven TIF district by up to seven years. To exercise this authority, the city must
find that the area, at the time of the original approval of the plan, would
have qualified to be certified as a redevelopment district. This is a renewal and renovation district,
which under general law is allowed a duration of 15 years after the receipt
of the first increment. Thus, this
would extend the duration to a maximum of 22 years after the receipt of the
first increment. Effective date: Local approval by the city, county, and
school district |
No comparable provision |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
15
|
Arden Hills TIF; authorization. Authorizes the city of Arden Hills to establish a
TIF district on the TCAAP site. This district will be
exempt from several general law TIF rules: } It is deemed to be a
redevelopment district without meeting the blight test. } The five-year rule is
extended to ten years. } The duration limit of
the district is increased from 25 years to 30 years. } The city may elect to
delay receipt of the first increment (which starts the duration limit
running) by up to six years. Under general law, the authority to do this is
limited to four years. The authority to create
a district under the special law expires on December 31, 2019. |
No comparable provision |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
16
|
St. Paul, housing replacement powers. Re-authorizes the city of St. Paul to exercise
housing replacement district powers.
This power was granted to the city under a 1995 special law, but the
city did not approve the law and so it lost the authority to do so in
1997. This would reinstate that
authority (not subject to local approval).
The city of Richfield is in a similar situation (i.e., it received
authority, but did not approve the law). Effective date: Final enactment |
Section 27, similar, but extends
treatment to the city of Fridley. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
17
|
City of Sauk Rapids; TIF. Authorizes the city of Sauk Rapids to use
special rules in meeting the blight test for redevelopment districts by
extending the time allowed to certify parcels with previously demolished
substandard buildings on them. Background To qualify as a
redevelopment district, 70 percent of the parcels of an area must be occupied
by buildings or other improvements and 50 percent of the buildings must be
“substandard.” The development
authority can treat a vacant parcel as being occupied by a substandard parcel
if four conditions are met: 1.
The parcel was occupied by a substandard building three years before
the district was certified. 2.
The substandard building was removed by the authority or by the
developer under a development agreement with the authority. 3.
The authority made findings, by resolution, that the building was
substandard and that it intended to include the parcel in a redevelopment
district. 4.
The authority notifies the county auditor that the original tax
capacity of the district must include the value of the parcel with the
building, if this is greater than the bare land value. Changes Made by this Section The bill extends the
time period, as described under item #1 above, so that it runs until at least
December 31, 2012, even if the demolition occurred more than three years
before that date. |
Section 29, similar, but removes
alternative time limit of three years from date of demolition. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
18
|
Duluth Port Authority; five-year rule. Allows the Seaway Port Authority to create one or
more TIF districts in a defined area that would qualify for special treatment
under the five-year rule. The five-year rule
requires the development authority to complete the district’s in-district
activities within five years after certification of the district. Under this section, the
five-year rule would begin to run for the listed parcels from the later of
(1) the rule under general law (i.e., from certification of the district) or
(2) when all of the qualifying parcels in the district are delisted (i.e.,
cleaned up). |
Section 33, extends the five-year rule
to a ten-year period. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
19
|
City of Mankato; special TIF authority. Provides exemptions from the general law
rules under the TIF act for a district in the city of Mankato. These exceptions include: }
Pooling limitations. The city is permitted to use
revenues from the district to construct street and roadway improvements located
within 500 feet or less of the TIF district boundaries, notwithstanding the
percentage limits on pooling under general law. }
Five-year rule. The five-year rule is extended to 11
years. The five-year rule requires the
development authority to complete the district’s in-district activities
within five years after certification of the district. Effective date: Upon local approval by the city. |
Section 23 provides exceptions from general law for the same district: · authorizes the city to expend increments generated from its South Riverfront tax increment financing district anywhere within the South Riverfront redevelopment project area; · increments from this district may be used to pay the city of Mankato for allowable expenditures under the planned budget for the district; and · the requirement for resolutions relating to the granting of interfund loans would not apply to this district. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
20
|
Faribault; JOBZ extension. Allows the city of
Faribault, with approval of the commissioner of the department of employment
and economic development (DEED), to extend the duration of JOBZ tax benefits
for one site in the city by five years.
(This will allow the benefits to be provided through 2021, rather than
2016.) This authority only applies, if
the city enters a business subsidy agreement with a firm that produces
products to increase the efficiency of the use of energy resources. This authority expires on January 1, 2011. Effective
date: Day following final enactment. |
No comparable provision |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 1 provides that there will be no municipal incorporations after June 1, 2009, and before June 1, 2014. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 2 adds to the definition of "special services" for a special service district in a city that includes a portion of the Central Corridor light rail transit project, public redevelopments costs related to the project, including the cost of programs to mitigate lost parking caused by the project. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 3 provides a definition of a new type of tax increment financing district, a "compact development district." This district would consist of a project within which parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area of the district are occupied by commercial or industrial buildings or other structures, and the planned redevelopment or development of the district will increase the total square footage of commercial or industrial buildings in the district by three times or more. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section
7 provides that a compact development district will have a duration of 25
years |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 8 provides that tax increments derived from a compact development district may be used only to pay the cost of acquiring land located in the district or a abutting its boundary, demolition and removal of buildings or other improvements or site preparation, and installation of public infrastructure or public improvements serving the district, not to include the cost of streets, roads, highways, parking, or other public improvements designed to serve private passenger motor vehicles. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 13 provides that no additional JOBZ designations will be made after April 30, 2009. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
No comparable provision |
Sections 16 to 19 modify the availability of the public financing for public improvements at the Mall of America so that they are available for any phase of the Mall of America, rather than being limited to Phase II. In section 18 revenue bonds may be sold to pay for public improvements not related to parking at the Mall of America. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 21 imposes a labor peace agreement requirement as a condition of providing any public financing to any phase of the Mall of America project. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
H.F. 1298 (first engrossment), section 45 is the
same, except for a minor language difference. |
Section 22 authorizes the cities of Chisago City and Lindstrom and their development authorities, as well as Chisago County, to enter into a joint powers agreement to acquire and develop a business park in either city. Any of the parties to the agreement may spend money or incur debt for the project, even if the project is not located within its corporate boundaries. An election is not required for issuance of debt under this section. If the project is included in a tax increment financing district, each city and authority that is a party to the agreement may treat the tax increment district as being located within its corporate boundaries. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 24 enables the city of North Mankato to expand the boundaries of an existing tax increment financing district to include specified property. The original tax capacity of the district will be adjusted according to the amount of value added by the addition of the new area permitted under this proposal. The bill provides that the tax increments derived from the enlarged districts may be used to pay the port authority of the city of North Mankato and the city for allowable expenditures under the tax increment plan and to pay debt service on tax increment bonds issued by the city for redevelopment costs in the district. The requirement that, when a redevelopment district is enlarged, the reasons and supporting facts for the determination that the addition to the district meets the criteria for creation of the original district must be documented is waived for this addition. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 25 authorizes a ten‑year duration extension for a tax increment financing district in the city of St. Louis Park. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 26 authorizes the St. Paul HRA to establish a Central Corridor light rail transit project area as a redevelopment project. At least 80 percent of the property included in the project area must located within one‑quarter mile of the Central Corridor light rail transit alignment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section
28 provides that four existing
tax increment financing districts in the city of St. Paul would be allowed to
expend money for costs related to the Central Corridor. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 31 provides that, of the money available in the Minnesota Investment Fund, $3,000,000 will be appropriated in fiscal year 2010 for a loan to an aircraft manufacturing and assembly company for equipment used to establish an aircraft completion center at the Minneapolis‑St. Paul International Airport. The center must use the state's vocational training programs designed specifically for aircraft maintenance training, and to the extent possible, recruit employees from these programs. The center is required to create at least 200 new manufacturing jobs within 24 months of receiving the loan, and not less than 500 new manufacturing jobs over a five‑year period in Minnesota. The loan is not subject to the $1,000,000 loan limitation under the general law, and match requirements may be made from current resources. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
H.F. 1298 (first engrossment), section 46 is the
same. |
Section 32 authorizes the Mountain Iron Economic Development Authority to form or become a member of a limited liability company for the purpose of developing a community‑based energy development project. The LLC would be subject to the open meeting requirements of state law. The project is prohibited from selling, transmitting, or distributing the electrical energy at retail or providing for end use of the electrical energy to an off‑site facility of the economic development authority or the LLC. The authority is authorized to acquire a leasehold interest in property outside its boundaries for the purpose of the project. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
H.F. 1298 (first engrossment), section 47 is the
same. |
Section 34 authorizes the Winona County Development Economic Authority to form or become a member of a limited liability company for the purpose of developing a community‑based energy development project. The LLC would be subject to the open meeting requirements of state law. The project is prohibited from selling, transmitting, or distributing the electrical energy at retail or providing for end use of the electrical energy to an off‑site facility of the economic development authority or the limited liability company. The authority is allowed to acquire a leasehold interest in property outside its corporate boundaries for the purpose of developing the project. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 35 is the repealer. Laws 1996, chapter 464, article 1, section 8, subdivisions 3 and 5, are limitations of the expenditures on tax increment from the Bloomington tax increment financing district in the vicinity of the Mall of America. Laws 2008, chapter 366, article 5, section 30, subdivision 7, is a requirement that the Legislative Commission on Planning and Fiscal Policy would review Mall of America financing information. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sec. |
Article 12: Minerals |
Article
8: Minerals |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
|
Nonferrous minerals assistance area. Defines the nonferrous minerals assistance
area as the area comprised by 13 designated school districts. |
No comparable provision |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2
|
Within nonferrous minerals assistance area. Modifies the distribution of revenues from
the net proceeds tax on mining as follows:
Also renames the area as
the “nonferrous minerals assistance area.” Note: Currently no taxes are being collected from
the net proceeds tax on mining. |
No comparable provision |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3
|
Outside nonferrous minerals assistance
area. Technical change relating to renaming of
the area in section 2. |
No comparable provision |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4
|
Segregation of funds. Requires that some of the distributions
under section 2 be kept segregated so
that the proceeds are only distributed or used for projects within the
nonferrous minerals assistance area. |
No comparable provision |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5
|
Taconite economic development fund. Allows funds loaned for a specific biomass
energy facility to be used for other project costs in addition to
construction costs. Also extends the
deadline by which the loan must be made from July 1, 2009, to July 1,
2010. Also deletes obsolete language. |
Section 2. Similar, but does not allow use for project
costs other than construction of the biomass energy facility. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
6
|
Imposed; calculation. Freezes the production tax rate for 2009 at
the same rate in effect for production year 2008. Allows resumption of rate indexing for 2010
and thereafter. |
Section 3. Does not freeze production tax rate. Clarifies that for the escalator that
applies to the production tax rate, the implicit price deflator would not be
applied if it were less than zero. This section also provides that the
exemption from production tax for direct reduced ore facilities during their
first two years of commercial production would not subject those facilities
to the general property tax. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
7
|
City or town where quarried or produced. Increases the distribution to the city or
town where the quarrying, mining, or concentrating occurs from 4.5 cents to
6.5 cents per taxable ton. Changes the
basis for distributing the proceeds so that 50 percent goes to the city or
town where mining or quarrying occurs and 50 percent goes to the city or town
where concentrating occurs; the current shares are 40 percent and 60 percent,
respectively. These increased revenues
come from the elimination of the county, city, and town taconite railroad
aid. Effective for production in 2009,
for distributions in 2010 and thereafter. |
No comparable provision |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
8
|
Taconite environmental fund; additional distribution. Provides that an amount equal to (i) the
2009 county, city and town taconite railroad distribution amount, less (ii) 2
cents per taxable ton distributed to cities and towns under section 7 must annually be
deposited in the taconite environmental fund beginning with the 2010
distribution. |
No comparable provision |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
9
|
Taconite railroad aid. Eliminates the county, city, and town
taconite railroad distribution beginning with the 2010 distribution. (see
previous two sections for the redistribution of this revenue) |
No comparable provision |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 1 provides that if the amount of the occupation tax proceeds collected in 2009 exceeds the amount that had been forecasted to be collected from that source, half of the excess amount that is credited to the general fund and not dedicated under the statute to educational purposes will be deposited in the 21st Century Minerals Fund. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 4 provides that, in any year in which there are insufficient production tax proceeds to make the full distribution to school districts provided in law, production tax proceeds will be transferred from the taconite property tax relief account as needed to make the full distribution to the schools. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 5 modifies the definition of the area within which distributions will be made from the taconite municipal aid account by reference to the taconite assistance area. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 6 authorizes Breitung township to retain the one-cent per ton distribution it received in 2008 that was scheduled to expire if a new state park was not established in the township by July 1, 2009. This provision would extend that deadline to July 1, 2012. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 7 authorizes the Iron Range Resources and Rehabilitation Board to vote to provide $10,000,000 from the Douglas J. Johnson economic protection trust fund for a grant or forgivable loan to a manufacturer of windmill blades to be located in the taconite tax relief area. If the board provides this money, then an additional $10,000,000 is appropriated from the general fund and an additional $10,000,000 will be transferred from the 21st Century Minerals Fund for this purpose. |
|
Sec. |
Article 13: Miscellaneous |
Article
15: Miscellaneous |
|
1
|
Bovine tuberculosis testing grants. Authorizes a grant
program to replace the income tax credit repealed by article 1. Grants would be administered by the
commissioner of agriculture, and would compensate cattle owners for bovine
tuberculosis testing expenses. The
grant amounts would mirror the repealed tax credit – i.e., 25 percent of the
testing costs for corporations and 50 percent for all others. Grant payments would be made annually by
March 31 for testing costs incurred in the previous calendar year. The appropriation for the grants is in
section 15 and is ongoing. |
No comparable provision |
|
2
|
Bovine tuberculosis grants; split-state
status. Authorizes a grant program to replace the
property tax credit for owners of cows, bison, and goats in the bovine
tuberculosis modified accredited zone.
The existing property tax credit is repealed in article 6. Grants would be administered by the
commissioner of agriculture. Grants equal $25 for
each animal tested in the largest whole-herd test performed on cattle, bison,
and goats in the modified accredited zone in 2006 through 2008. The grant is paid annually between July 1
and July 15, beginning in 2010 and is available until the year following the
year in which the Board of Animal Health declares Minnesota to be free of
bovine tuberculosis. The appropriations for
the grants are in section 15
and are ongoing. |
Article 4, sections 16 and 17, modify
the existing property tax credit for bovine tuberculosis. |
|
|
|
Article 4, section 16. The definition of the zone is no longer
referred to as a "proposed" zone, but instead means the modified
accredited zone that has been designated by the Board of Animal Health. The
reference to "located within" means that the herd is kept in the
area for at least part of calendar years 2006, 2007, or 2008. Current law is
limited to 2007 and a new definition of "animal" is added to mean
cattle, bison, goats, and farmed cervidae. |
|
|
|
Article 4, section 17. Clarifies the application of the credit to rural vacant land as well as agricultural land. The amount of the credit will be determined as the greater of $5.00 per acre on the first 160 acres of property where the herd had been located or an amount equal to $5.00 per acre, times five acres, times the highest number of animals tested on the property for bovine tuberculosis in 2006, 2007, or 2008. The amount of the credit may not exceed the property tax payable on the land where the herd had been located, excluding tax attributable to residential structures. |
|
3
|
Income tax microdata coordinating
committee. Exempts the income tax microdata
coordinating committee from the general sunset on commissions and similar
groups. |
Article 14, section 2, same |
|
4
|
Tax preparation services. |
Article 15, section 1, similar provision |
|
|
Subdivision 1. Scope. Provides
within the scope that the statute governing tax preparation does not apply
to: }
a person who
provides services to fewer than ten clients per year; }
a person who
provides services only to immediate family members; }
an employee
who prepares the employer’s return as part of his job; }
a fiduciary
acting on behalf of an estate; }
nonprofit
organizations providing services under IRS volunteer tax assistance programs. With the
exception of the nonprofit organizations, these individuals are exempt under
current law under subdivision 8 of this section, relating to exemptions from
the statute. The changes to this
subdivision move these exemptions to the scope subdivision, and
increase the number of clients an individual may provide services for while
remaining exempt from fewer than six to fewer than ten. [Note: since “tax preparation services” is
defined as services for a fee or other consideration, nonprofit organizations
participating in IRS volunteer programs are exempt under current law since
they do not charge for their services.] |
Identical provision |
|
|
Subd. 2. Definitions. Adds definitions necessary for the
disclosure requirements of this section to apply to refund anticipation
checks and for the proposed requirement that disclosures be made in the
client’s primary language, if the preparer advertises in that language. Current law imposes disclosure requirements
on refund anticipation loans. |
Identical provision |
|
|
Subd.
3. Standards of conduct. Prohibits
tax preparers from: }
Establishing
an account to receive a client’s refund solely in the preparer’s name (makes
an exception consistent with statute allowing taxpayers to assign K-12
credits to another party); }
Failing to
act in the client’s best interests; }
Failing to
safeguard and account for any money handled for the client; }
Failing to
disclose material facts; }
Taking any
action prohibited for collection agencies; }
Including in
any agreement to provide tax preparation services a hold harmless clause,
confession of judgment, waiver of a right to a jury trial, assignment of
wages for services, provision preventing the client from asserting claims,
waiver of any provision of statute relating to tax preparers, or waiver of
the client’s right to relief; }
Failing to
provide disclosures required under the federal Truth in Lending Act as part
of offering refund anticipation loans. |
Identical provision |
|
|
Subd. 3a. Written agreements
required; refund anticipation loans and checks. Requires refund anticipation loan and check
agreements to be in writing and prohibits the loans and checks from requiring
payment of any item other than tax preparation fees or other related fees and
the anticipated refund amount that is advanced via the loan or check. If a RAL or RAC agreement includes a
mandatory arbitration clause, requires a separate written notice that
arbitration is the only means of dispute resolution, that the client has 30
days to opt out of the arbitration clause, and that the arbitration clause
does not apply if the client’s dispute involves a violation on the part of
the tax preparer or if the client pursues a civil action as provided in
subdivision 7. Requires the preparer
to notify the client orally and in writing of how to opt out of the
arbitration clause. |
Similar provision, only difference is
last sentence of paragraph (a) does not contain the words “associated with
the refund anticipation loan or refund anticipation check.” |
|
|
Subd. 4. Required disclosures. Restructures
the current subdivision 4, which requires disclosures for refund anticipation
loans, to instead specify the format for disclosures for refund anticipation
loans (which are provided in the proposed subdivision 4a) and disclosures for
refund anticipation checks (which are provided in the proposed subdivision
4b). Disclosures for both kinds of
advance payments of refunds must be in writing on a single sheet of paper,
and signed and dated by both the client and the tax preparer. These requirements are in current law with
regard to refund anticipation loans; the changes to this section and the
proposed subdivision 4b would extend the same requirements to refund
anticipation checks. Also requires
disclosures to be provided in the client’s primary language, if the tax
preparer advertises in that language. |
Similar provision, technical and
stylistic differences, and the Senate does not have require disclosures to be
in at least 14-point type with at least a double space between each
statement. |
|
|
Subd. 4a. Refund anticipation loan
disclosures.
Restates the disclosure requirements for refund anticipation loans
that are stricken in subdivision 4 in the proposed subdivision 4a, with the
following additions: }
Requires an
explicit statement that the RAL is not the client’s tax refund; }
Notifies the
client of the right to cancel the RAL by returning the loan check or the
amount of the loan in cash to the preparer within one business day. |
Identical provision |
|
|
Subd. 4b. Refund anticipation
check disclosures. Provides disclosure requirements for refund
anticipation checks, different from the requirements for refund anticipation
loans. Statements required on the
disclosure: }
The client is
not required to purchase a RAC in order to get their tax refund }
The IRS can
direct deposit the refund to the client’s account within 8 to 15 days }
Clients who
purchase a RAC will have access to their tax refund within 8 to 15 days }
the RAC is
not a loan }
the cost of
the RAC }
the option to
the client of paying for the RAC at the time of filing or having it withheld
from the refund }
that the cost
of return preparation does not change if the client purchases a RAC Also
provides that preparers who offer products that meet the definition of a
refund anticipation check but use a different product name must substitute
the product name for the term ‘RAC’ in the required disclosure. |
Similar provision, minor technical
language difference: use of “eight”
vs. “8.” |
|
|
Subd. 5. Itemized bill required. Adds fees
associated with a refund anticipation check to the list of items required to
be itemized on the bill for tax preparation services. |
Identical provision |
|
|
Subd. 5b. Right to rescind refund
anticipation loan. Authorizes clients to rescind a refund
anticipation loan within one business day of entering an agreement by
providing written notification to the preparer and either returning the check
or conveying the same amount in cash to the preparer. Allows a tax preparer to charge a fee for
rescinding a loan only if the preparer established an account at a financial
institution to receive the refund and limits the fee to the amount the
financial institution charged to open the account. |
Similar provision, paragraph (a) has
technical language difference; intent of both bills is to require (i) written
notification of rescinding agreement and (ii) either return of the check or
payment of the same amount in cash to the preparer. |
|
|
Subd. 6. Enforcement; penalties. Applies
the existing $1,000 administrative penalty in current law to violations of
the new written agreement requirement and right to rescind loans proposed in
subdivisions 3a and 5b. Provides that
the administrative penalty does not apply if the conduct is also subject to
civil penalties under section 289A.60, including termination of the
preparer’s authorization to submit returns electronically. |
Identical provision |
|
|
Subds. 6a to 6c. Exchange of data. Extends the requirement that the commissioner of revenue, the State
Board of Accountancy, and the Lawyers Board of Professional Responsibility
exchange information about complaints they receive about accountants and
lawyers who are preparers to apply to violations of proposed subdivisions 3a,
4a, and 5b. |
Similar provision, no reference to 3a,
4, 4a, and 4b, but assumed to be included in span of subdivisions referenced. |
|
|
Subd. 7. Enforcement; civil actions. Provides
that an action taken by the attorney general to enforce this section of
statute is in the public interest.
Also expands the amount a court finding for a plaintiff must award to
include statutory damages equal to tax preparation fees, interest and fees
for refund anticipation loan, times two.
Under present law, plaintiffs are awarded actual damages, attorney
fees, court costs, and any other relief the court finds reasonable. |
Identical provision |
|
|
Subd. 8. Limited exemptions. Strikes exemptions for
various classes of individuals who will still be exempt as a result of
changes to subdivision 1. Provides
that the proposed written agreement requirement in subdivision 3a and the
proposed right to rescind refund anticipation loans in subdivision 5b apply
to attorneys, certified public accountants, and enrolled agents. Provides a new exemption for employees and
supervisors who assist people exempt under this subdivision in preparing
returns. |
Identical provision |
|
5
|
Time for filing. Establishes a procedure for filing claims
for refunds of payments made under the law that imposes personal liability on
responsible officers and directors for unpaid taxes of a business
entity. The personal liability statute
generally applies to individuals who are responsible (by themselves or with
others) for filing and paying the specified taxes on behalf of the
business. This liability most
frequently arises with regard to sales tax and withholding tax, but also
applies to some other tax types. If the
business fails to pay, the Department of Revenue (DOR) issues an order
assessing personal liability for the tax against the director or officer. Authorizes individuals,
subject to personal liability assessments, to file claims for refunds (which
will enable them to appeal administratively or file a lawsuit), if they do so
within 120 days of making a payment and if this is no more than 3˝ years after
DOR issued the assessment. The ability
to claim a refund applies to both voluntary payments and to amounts collected
by DOR (e.g., by garnishing wages or levying on a bank account). It does not require paying the full
assessment to file a claim for a refund. Background.
Under present law, directors and officer have 60 days to appeal the
DOR order. If they fail to appeal
within the 60-day period, they lose their right to contest the liability
(e.g., by claiming that they are not “responsible” within the meaning of the
statute). Although it is somewhat
unclear, the law does not provide the authority for an assessed individual to
pay the liability and, then, seek a refund as an alternative method of
contesting their liability. (Taxpayers
can contest most other tax liabilities in two ways – either by appealing
before payment or by paying and seeking a refund.) Effective for personal
liability assessments issued after the day following final enactment. |
Article 15, section 2, same; minor
technical difference, use of “three and one-half years” vs. “3-1/2 years.” |
|
6
|
Recertification of levy due to
unallotment. Allows local governments
to recertify their levy by January 15 of the year in which the levy is paid
if it has a reduction in its December property tax aid and credit payments
due to a governor’s unallotment. If
the recertification is not reported to the county auditor within two business
days of January 15, the original levy certification stands. |
No comparable provision |
|
7
|
Special levies. Provides
for the following changes to special levies outside of levy limits: }
puts the
existing limit on the special levy for animal shelters into this section
since the limit in the cross reference was eliminated in another bill; } expands the existing
special levy for aid and credit reductions due to unallotments to include (1)
aid losses that occur in the previous year, after a city or county has
certified its levy; and (2) reductions in market values credits; } adds a special levy to
pay for the state share of the costs of confining sex offenders undergoing
the civil commitment process to the extent the state does not fund its share;
and } adds a special levy for
counties to pay the first year costs of maintaining and operating a new
public safety and courts facility that was funded prior to the imposition of
levy limits in 2008. This amount is
rolled into the county’s levy limit base in subsequent years. |
Article 4, section 61, repeals levy
limits. |
|
8
|
Adjusted levy limit base. Clarifies that the inflation adjustment for the
levy limit can not be less than a 2 percent increase. |
Article 4, section 61, repeals levy
limits. |
|
9
|
Mortgage registry tax; property located in
multiple counties. Modifies the distribution of
the mortgage registry tax (MRT) when a mortgage covers real property located
in more than one county. Provides that
the total tax, regardless of the amount of the mortgage, must be paid to the
treasurer of the county where the mortgage is first presented for recording. Under current law, if
the principal debt or obligation secured by a multiple county mortgage
exceeds $1,000,000, the nonstate portion (i.e., the 3 percent that the
counties retain) must be redistributed to each of the counties where the
property is located (by the county treasurer who initially receives the total
payment), based on the ratio that the portion of the market value of each of
the counties is to the total market value of the entire property. Requires that this settlement be done on or
before the 20th day of each month when these transactions
occur. This section eliminates this
and provides that the total tax must be paid to the treasurer of the county
where the mortgage is first recorded, and that county keeps the full amount
of the tax, regardless of the amount of the mortgage. Effective the day
following final enactment. |
Article 15, section 3. Mortgage registry tax payments. Related provision Amends Minn. St. § 287.08, paragraph (d), related to apportionment of payments of the tax for real property located in more than one county. This section raises the value of the debt secured by the mortgage that is subject to division and payment by the county treasurer from $1 million to $10 million. Effective the day following final enactment. |
|
|
No comparable provisions |
Sections 5 and 6. Hospital tax and surgical center tax. Amends Minnesota Statutes, section 295.52, subdivisions 1 and 1a. Provides for an unspecified change to each of these taxes. |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 7. Gambling taxes‑reports and records. Amends Minnesota Statutes, section 297E.06, subdivision 4. Raises the threshold for annual financial audits from $300,000 receipts to $500,000. Allows the Commissioner of Revenue to require a financial audit of organizations with less than $500,000 of gross receipts for various violations of gambling tax compliance requirements. Organizations licensed under chapter 349 must now perform a certified inventory and cash count each year. The Commissioner of Revenue will prescribe the standards for these requirements. |
|
|
|
Section 8. Solid waste management tax exemptions. Amends Minn. St. § 297H.06, subdivision 1, related to certain surcharges or fees that are exempt from the solid waste management tax. This section provides an exemption from the solid waste management tax that would apply to service charges imposed by a home rule charter city that owns and operates a solid waste‑to‑energy resource recovery facility. The exemption is effective retroactively for taxes imposed after March 31, 2007. |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 9. Charitable organizations‑financial statement requirements. Amends Minnesota Statutes, section 309.53, subdivision 3. Raises the threshold from revenue of $350,000 to $750,000 that triggers an audited financial statement that has been examined by an independent certified public accountant. |
|
|
No comparable provisions |
Sections 10 and 11. Gambling taxes compliance. Amends Minnesota Statutes, sections 349.1641 and 349.19, subdivision 9. Shortens the time for suspension of a license for filing a late tax return from three months to 45 days. Amends one annual audit requirement to still require an annual financial audit, but discontinue the requirement for an annual financial review. |
|
|
No comparable provisions |
Sections 12 to 14. Local police and firefighters relief association amortization state aid. Provides corrective language clarifying that the distribution of amortization state aid and supplementary amortization state aid is an open and standing appropriation. Current law contains the distribution amounts, but lacks conventional open and standing appropriation language. Subdivision 3a provides for retroactive annual appropriation language from the general fund to the Commissioner of Revenue for both aid programs. |
|
10
|
Net debt limit. Narrows the net debt limit exception for
bonds issued to fund other postemployment employee benefits (OPEB)
liabilities to apply only to school district bonds. Section 11 repeals the authority
of cities, counties, and towns to issues these bonds. Effective date: August 1, 2009 |
No comparable provision |
|
11
|
Authority to issue OPEB bonds. Eliminates the authority of cities,
counties, and towns to issue bonds to fund actuarial liabilities for OPEB,
but preserves the authority for schools to issue these bonds. Present law defines these liabilities by
reference to Governmental Accounting Standard Board (GASB) Statement No. 45. Effective date: August 1, 2009 |
No comparable provision |
|
12
|
Referendum exemption. Eliminates the exemption from the election
requirement for OPEB bonds. This
exemption was enacted in 2008, and authorized municipalities to issues bonds,
without holding referenda, to pay for other postemployment employee benefits. Because section 11 repeals the authority
for cities, counties, and towns to issue these bonds, this change will only
affect school districts, requiring them to seek voter approval to issue these
bonds. Effective date: August 1, 2009 |
No comparable provision |
|
13
|
Emergency certificates of indebtedness. Emergency debt certificates. Authorizes a city, county, or town to issue emergency debt certificates if both of the following occur in a fiscal year: }
The governmental unit’s current year revenues are expected to be
reduced below their budgeted amounts (i.e., the amount set in the budget used
to set the property tax levy) }
The reduction
is so large that current year expenses will exceed current year receipts. This authority, for example, could be triggered by a mid-year reduction in state payments of aids or credits, by an unexpectedly high level of property tax delinquencies or a drop in receipts from fees for issuing building permits and similar. The maximum amount of certificates that may be issued is limited to the expected reduction in receipts, plus the costs of issuance. The certificates must mature (be paid off) within two years of the end of the fiscal year in which they were issued. The certificates are excluded from net debt limits. A governmental unit issuing emergency debt certificates is adjusted to prohibit it from exercising special levy authority (outside levy limits) for amounts funded with the certificates. Since levies to repay bonded debt (including the emergency debt certificates) are special levies, this prevents a city or county from both receiving an additional direct levy for the same aid reduction. |
Article 4, section 49, similar
provision. House coordinates issuance
of emergency certificates with special levies authorized in House article 13,
section 7. Senate does not authorize
special levies. |
|
14
|
Budget reserve. Directs the commissioner of
finance to transfer $250 million to the budget reserve account in fiscal year
2010. In order for the transfer to be
in compliance with the requirements of the 2009 federal stimulus law, the
transfer is made from revenues resulting from legislation enacted in 2009. |
No comparable provision |
|
15
|
Appropriations. Bovine tuberculosis grants. Appropriates $360,000 each year from the
general fund to the commissioner of agriculture to make grants for bovine
tuberculosis testing expenses to replace the current income tax credit. Appropriates $400,000 each year from the
general fund to the commissioner of agriculture to make grants to owners of
cattle, bison, and goats in the modified accredited bovine tuberculosis zone
to replace the current property tax credit.
The commissioner of agriculture may use up to 5 percent of each
appropriation to administer the grant program. Both appropriations are
ongoing and added to the budget base, but the authority for the grants to
replace the property tax credit ends when the state is declared free of
bovine tuberculosis. Effective
beginning in fiscal year 2010. Basic sliding fee child care.
Appropriates $5 million each year from the general fund for FY 2010
and FY 2011 to the commissioner of human services for the basic sliding fee
child care program. This is in addition
to other appropriations for this purpose and would be added to the budget
base. Article 1 repeals the dependent
care credit. |
No comparable provision |
|
|
No comparable
provision |
Section 15. Appropriation. Appropriates $164,081,000 from the general fund to be used for the purpose of 2009 S.F. 2078, if enacted. S.F. 2078 relates to economic development. |
|
Sec. |
|
Senate Article 7: Public Finance
|
|
|
H.F. 1298 (first engrossment), section 1 is the
same. |
Section 1 provides that, when the Commissioner of Finance issues state general
obligation bonds authorized under law, the bonds may be either tax credit
bonds or interest subsidy bonds or a combination of them. Tax credit bonds
are bonds that provide taxable income, but for which the owner of the bonds
is entitled to a federal tax credit. Interest subsidy bonds are bonds with
taxable interest for which the issuer is entitled to federal interest subsidy
payments. |
|
|
H.F. 1298 (first engrossment), section 49 repeals the
sunset. |
Section 2 extends the sunset date for the authority to issue bonds by the
State Fair Board from July 1, 2009, to July 1, 2015. |
|
|
H.F. 1298 (first engrossment), section 6 is the
same. |
Section 3 provides that whenever the state pays interest on bonds issued by a
school district for which the issuer is entitled to federal interest subsidy
payments, the state is subrogated to the issuer's rights to federal interest
subsidy payments until the state has been reimbursed by the issuer. |
|
|
H.F. 1298 (first engrossment), section 7 is the
same. |
Section 4 eliminates the prohibition on submitting more than two
ballot questions at a mail election. |
|
|
H.F. 1298 (first engrossment), section 9 is the
same. |
Section
5 eliminates the
referendum requirement for airport improvement bonds that are issued by a
municipality if the bonds are authorized by resolution of the governing body
of the municipality with a vote of at least 60 percent of its members |
|
|
H.F. 1298 (first engrossment), section 10 is the
same. |
Section 6 extends the maximum maturity of certificates of indebtedness issued
by towns from five to ten years. |
|
|
H.F. 1298 (first engrossment), section 13 is the
same. |
Section 7 provides that bonds issued for a public safety radio system by a
county under its capital improvement program do not count against the
limitation on the total amount of the bonds that may be issued under the
program. |
|
|
H.F. 1298 (first engrossment), section 25 is the
same. |
Section 8 provides that when the state pays interest on bonds issued under the
public facilities authority, the state is subrogated to the issuer's rights
to any federal interest subsidy payments until the state has been reimbursed
in full. |
|
|
H.F. 1298 (first engrossment), section 26 is the
same. |
Section 9 removes the requirement that an authority that has been established
within a city in which a county and multi‑county housing and
redevelopment authority intends to operate a project must adopt a resolution
declaring that there is a need for the exercise of powers by the authority.
The governing body of the city in which the project will be located is still
required to adopt a resolution to that effect. |
|
|
No comparable
provision |
Sections 10 to 12 amend the bidding and payment and
performance bond requirements for HRAs so that those requirements are the
same as provided under the Uniform Municipal Contracting Law and the law that
generally applies to contractors' bonds for public work. |
|
|
H.F. 1298 (first engrossment), section 27 is the
same. |
Section 13 provides that a housing and redevelopment
authority may issue bonds to refund outstanding bonds secured by the general
obligation pledge of the city or county without making additional findings
regarding the adequacy of pledged revenues or conducting a public hearing.
This provision is made effective retroactively to apply to refunding bonds
issued after June 30, 1992. |
|
|
No comparable
provision |
Section 14 provides that the law that renders
previously tax‑exempt HRA property taxable, does not apply to leases by
the authority to individuals or families for residential use. This section is
made applicable to housing projects and housing development projects constructed
or acquired by an authority after July 1, 1987. |
|
|
No comparable
provision |
Section 15 modifies the tax treatment of metropolitan
area HRA properties that include both subsidized housing and other types of
housing so that the ratio of taxable to nontaxable property is determined
according to the number of units in the facility that are constructed with
funds provided under section 5 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, and
that receive operating subsidies under section 5 or rental assistance under
section 8. |
|
|
H.F. 1298 (first engrossment), section 28 is the
same. |
Section 16 expands the definition of
"project" in the municipal industrial development law to include
property used in connection with manufacturing, creation, or production of
intangible property including any patent, copyright, formula, process, design,
know‑how, format or similar item. |
|
|
H.F. 1298 (first engrossment), section 29 is the
same. |
Section 17 provides that facilities for conventions
and conferences are included within the properties for which a city operating
a program of public recreation and playgrounds may acquire or lease property. |
|
|
H.F. 1298 (first engrossment), section 32 is the
same. |
Section 18 modifies the definition of "annual
volume cap" in the bond allocation law to specify that it refers to
obligations constituting private activity bonds under federal tax law. It
also provides that the Department of Finance will administer the volume cap
allocations for obligations permitted under the federal American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009. |
|
|
H.F. 1298 (first engrossment), section 33 is the
same. |
Section 19 modifies the definition of
"manufacturing project" to include the type of facility that is
used in the manufacturing, creation, or production of intangible property. |
|
|
H.F. 1298 (first engrossment), section 37 is the
same. |
Section 20 defines "rating category" to
mean a generic securities rating category without regard to subcategories of
the ratings. |
|
|
H.F. 1298 (first engrossment), section 40 is the
same. |
Section 21 extends from ten to 30 years the greatest
maturity date of bonds issued by the city of St. Paul for public buildings or
parking structures. |
|
|
H.F. 1298 (first engrossment), section 43 is the
same. |
Section 22 requires the Commissioner of Finance to
apply a deposit of $31,800 paid by the St. Paul Port Authority in 2008 for a
proposed bond issue of $1,590,000 for District Cooling St. Paul, Inc. to a
later application for an allocation of tax‑exempt bonds for the same
project. This authority expires January 1, 2011. |
|
|
H.F. 1298 (first engrossment), section 50 is the
same. |
Section 23 is the effective date, which is the day
following final enactment for all provisions in the article other than those
that specify a different date. |
|
Sec. |
HF 885, Art. 1, as passed by House Tax
Committee (April 29) and sent to Floor |
Senate Article 9: Department Individual Income,
Corporate Franchise, and Estate Taxes
|
|
|
H.F. 885 (first
engrossment), Article 1, section 1, same |
Section 1. Designated member for single combined returns.
Amends Minn. Stat. § 289A.08, subd. 3, to allow a corporation without
Minnesota nexus that is a member of a unitary business to file and be liable
as the designated member for tax matters of the unitary business that is
required to file a single combined report. Effective for tax years beginning
after |
|
|
H.F. 885 (first
engrossment), Article 1, sections 2 and 3, same. |
Sections 2 and 3. Information reporting by
qualified intermediaries.
Amends Minn. Stat. §§ 289A.12 and 289A.18 to require qualified intermediaries
to report information to the commissioner concerning exchanges facilitated by
the intermediary. The reports are due 30 days after demand by the
commissioner. Effective |
|
|
H.F. 885 (first
engrossment), Article 1, section 4, same |
Section 4. Estate tax return due date. Amends Minn. Stat. § 289A.19, subd. 4,
removing the requirement that taxpayers request the obligatory six‑month
filing extension for estate tax returns by automatically providing the same.
Effective for estates of decedents dying after |
|
|
Article 1,
section 2, identical |
Section 5. Penalty for failure to withhold
from wages or from pay to independent contractors in the construction trades. Amends Minn. Stat. § 289A.31, subd. 5, by
adding a penalty that applies when employers fail to withhold income tax when
required to do so under |
|
|
H.F. 885 (first
engrossment), Article 1, section 5, same |
Section 6. Reporting of federal adjustments
to withholding tax returns. Amends Minn. Stat. § 289A.38, subd. 7, to clarify that the
requirement to report federal changes to withholding tax returns applies when
there have been changes during a withholding tax period to the wages reported
to the Internal Revenue Service. Effective the day following final enactment. |
|
|
Article 1,
section 7 repeals the K-12 education subtraction |
Section 7. K‑12 education deduction ‑
transportation in taxpayer's vehicle. Amends Minn. Stat. § 290.01, subd. 19b (3), to clarify that a
taxpayer cannot claim expenses paid to transport a qualifying child in the
taxpayer's or the child's vehicle. This codifies the position found in
Minnesota Rule 8009.3000, which is otherwise being repealed as obsolete.
Effective the day following final enactment. |
|
|
H.F. 885 (first
engrossment), Article 1, section 6, same |
Section 8. Inflation adjustment for working
family credit. Amends
Minn. Stat. § 290.0671 so that the inflation adjustments required beginning
in 2009 for the higher married filing joint working family credit phase out
threshold conforms to inflation adjustment changes made in 2008 and thus
reflects only one year of inflation. Also removes obsolete language related
to the working family credit calculations for taxable years 2002 through
2007. Effective for taxable years beginning after |
|
|
H.F. 885 (first
engrossment), Article 1, sections 7 and 8, same |
Sections 9 and 10. Confession of judgment
for manufactured homes. Amends
Minn. Stat. § 290A.10 and 290A.14 to clarify that property taxes on a
manufactured home are not considered delinquent for purposes of the property
tax refund if the owner has entered into, and is current with, a confession
of judgment to pay the delinquency. Effective the day following final
enactment. |
|
|
Article 1,
section 7 repeals the K-12 education subtraction |
Section 11. Repealer. School tuition and transportation.
Minnesota Rule 8009.3000 is repealed. A portion of the Rule is being codified
in the amendment to Minn. Stat. § 290.01, subd. 19b (3). The remainder of the
Rule is repealed as obsolete. Effective the day following final enactment. |
|
Sec. |
HF 885, Art. 2, as passed by House Tax Committee (April 29) and sent to Floor |
Senate Article 10: Department Sales and Use Taxes |
|
|
H.F. 885, Article
2, sec. 1, same |
Section 1. Sales to government. Amends Minn. Stat. § 297A.70, subd. 2, to
provide that the exemption for sales to exempt units of government does not
apply to the purchase of alcoholic beverages. Effective for sales and
purchases made after |
|
|
H.F. 885, Article
2, sec. 2, same |
Section 2. Sales to nonprofit groups. Amends Minn. Stat. § 297A.70, subd. 4, to
provide that the exemption for sales to nonprofit groups does not apply to
the purchase of alcoholic beverages other than alcohol purchased by religious
organizations for sacramental purposes. Effective for sales and purchases
made after This section also provides that the
exemption for purchases made by senior citizens groups does not extend to
housing and that the senior citizen groups must have exempt status under
Internal Revenue Code § 501(c). Effective for sales and purchases made after |
|
|
H.F. 885, Article
2, sections 3 and 4, same |
Sections 3 and 4. Motor vehicle definition. Amends Minn. Stat. §§ 297A.992, subd. 2,
and 297A.993, subd. 1, to provide that for purposes of the Metropolitan
Transit Improvement Tax and the Greater Minnesota Transportation Tax, the
term "motor vehicle" is defined in Minn. Stat. § 297B.01, subd. 5,
for the sales tax on motor vehicles. Effective the day following final
enactment. |
|
|
H.F. 885, Article
2, sec. 5, same |
Section 5. Repealer. Repeals Minn. Stat. § 297A.67, subd. 24,
which provided a sales tax exemption for all sales and uses that the state
was prohibited from taxing under the |
|
Sec. |
HF 885, Art. 3, as passed by House Tax Committee (April 29) and sent to Floor |
Senate Article 11: Department Special Taxes |
|
|
H.F. No. 885
(first engrossment), article 3, section 3 is same. |
Section 1. Mortgage tax; agricultural loan
exemption. Amends Minn.
Stat. § 287.04, clause (i), to update the cross‑reference to the
property tax classification statute for agricultural property. The update is
necessary because of recent changes to the classification statute. Effective
the day following final enactment. |
|
|
H.F. No. 885
(first engrossment), article 3, section 4 is same. |
Section 2. Mortgage registry tax. Amends Minn. Stat. § 287.05 by adding the
new subd. 9. The provision clarifies the tax result when mortgages contain
multiple statements that are each designed to limit the debt secured by the
mortgage, the resulting tax obligation, or both. In such cases, the tax on
the mortgage is based on the actual combined effect of those statements, if
any, and not on the statements, or portions of them, taken in isolation.
Effective the day following final enactment. |
|
|
H.F. No. 885
(first engrossment), article 3, section 5 is same. |
Section 3. Deed tax; transfer on death
deeds. Amends |
|
|
H.F. No. 885
(first engrossment), article 3, section 6 is same. |
Sections 4 and 17. Deed tax stamps. Amends Minn. Stat. § 287.25 and repeals
Minn. Stat. §§ 287.26 and 287.27, subd. 1, to eliminate the procedure for
paying the deed tax by purchasing stamps of given denominations from the
county and affixing the proper number of stamps to the deed when it is
presented for recording. Taxpayers no longer use this procedure. Effective
the day following final enactment. |
|
|
H.F. No. 885
(first engrossment), article 3, section 7 is same. |
Section 5. Transfer of accounts receivable. Amends Minn. Stat. § 295.56 to add
surgical centers and wholesale drug distributors to the list of entities
whose liability is transferred to the transferee, assignee, or buyer when
accounts receivable are sold. Effective the day following final enactment. |
|
|
H.F. No. 885
(first engrossment), article 3, section 8 is same. |
Section 6. Exemption for amounts paid for
legend drugs. Amends Minn.
Stat. § 295.57, subd. 5, adds surgical centers to the list of entities that
may use an alternative method for calculating the cost of legend drugs when
the entity cannot determine the actual cost of the drug. Effective the day
following final enactment. |
|
|
H.F. No. 885
(first engrossment), article 3, section 9 is same. |
Section 7. Petroleum tax ‑ general
rules. Amends Minn. Stat. §
296A.21, subd. 1, which deals with the statute of limitations, to clarify
that a tax return filed before the last day prescribed by law for filing is
considered to be filed on the last day. Effective the day following final
enactment. |
|
|
H.F. No. 885
(first engrossment), article 3, sections 10, 13, 14, 16, and 18 are the same. |
Sections 8, 11, 12, 14, and 16. Electronic
payments. Amends Minn.
Stat. §§ 297E.02, subd. 4 (lawful gambling tax), 297F.09, subd. 7 (cigarette
and tobacco products tax), 297G.09, subd. 6 (liquor tax), 297I.35, subd. 2
(insurance tax), and 473.843, subd. 3 (metropolitan solid waste landfill
fee), to reduce the electronic payment threshold from $120,000 to $10,000 per
fiscal year. Effective for payments due in calendar years 2010 and
thereafter, based upon liabilities incurred in the fiscal year ending |
|
|
H.F. No. 885
(first engrossment), article 3, section 11 is same. |
Section 9. Lawful gambling ‑ required signatures. Amends
Minn. Stat. § 297E.06 by adding a new subdivision to clarify that signatures
of organization's CEO, gambling manager, and return preparer are all required
on tax returns. This identical requirement was contained in a |
|
|
H.F. No. 885
(first engrossment), article 3, section 12 is same. |
Section 10. Lawful gambling ‑ general
rule. Amends Minn. Stat. §
297E.11, subd. 1, which deals with the statute of limitations, to clarify
that a tax return filed before the last day prescribed by law for filing is
considered to be filed on the last day. Effective the day following final
enactment. |
|
|
H.F. No. 885
(first engrossment), article 3, section 15 is same. |
Section 13. Insurance tax ‑
extensions for filing returns.
Amends |
|
|
H.F. No. 885
(first engrossment), article 3, section 18 is same. |
Section 15. Distribution of production tax;
remainder. Amends Minn.
Stat. § 298.28, subd. 11, to delete obsolete language (the provision was
effective for 2003 distributions) and a reference to the deleted language.
Effective the day following final enactment. |
|
|
H.F. No. 885
(first engrossment), article 3, section 20 is same. |
Section 17. Repealer. Amends Minn. Stat. § 298.28, repealing
obsolete subdivisions 11a and 13. Subdivision 11a provided for prorated
distributions in production years 1994 through 1999. Subdivision 13 required
a deduction of credits authorized under '
298.24, subdivision 3, that was repealed in 2003. Effective the day following
final enactment. |
|
Sec. |
HF 885, Art. 4, as passed by House Tax
Committee (April 29) and sent to Floor |
Senate Article 12: Department Property Taxes and Aids |
|
|
H.F. 885, Art. 4,
section 1. Same, except that the first tier valuation limit for agricultural
homestead is set to $1,100,000 (Senate amount is $1,110,000). |
Section 1. Indexing agricultural homestead
first tier upper‑limit. Modifies the procedures for indexing the value of the first tier
valuation limit for homestead agricultural property. Due to provisions passed
in 2008 revising the class 2 definitions, the needed data is not consistent
after 2009, so the limit is re‑set for assessment year 2010; and, the
formula is resumed for assessment year 2011, with a two‑ year lag for
the base year. Effective for taxes payable in 2011 and thereafter. |
|
|
H.F. 885, Art. 4,
section 2. Same |
Section 2. Greens Acres; Indexing of
"low" value for nonproductive land. Allows
the data used to index the "low" value for nonproductive land to be
based on data from the prior assessment year; in order to avoid using data
from the current year that is not final. Effective for taxes payable in 2009
and thereafter. |
|
|
H.F. 885, Art. 4,
section 3. Same |
Section 3. Aggregate resource preservation
act. Clarifies that class 2e lands are eligible
if the 2e lands were class 1a or 1b immediately before becoming 2e. This
effectively allows all properties to qualify for both a partial value
exclusion and a preferential class rate. Effective for taxes payable in 2010
and thereafter. |
|
|
H.F. 885, Art. 4,
sections 4 and 5. Bovine zone property tax credit. Clarifies
that the credit applies to farms rather than to farm parcels, and to farms
from which herds were eradicated in 2006.
Effective for taxes payable in 2009 only (credit repealed effective
for payable 2010 in article 6, section 39). |
Senate modifies
bovine zone credit in article 4, sections 16 and 17. |
|
|
H.F. 885, Art. 4,
section 6. Same |
Section 4. Abatements and credits for
damaged properties; utility property. Clarifies that "utility
property" for these purposes ‑ i.e., authorizing the Commissioner
of Revenue to grant a disaster‑related abatement or credit ‑‑
is limited to property that is valued and classified by the Commissioner of
Revenue on an order. Effective the day following final enactment. |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Sections 5 and 6. Cooperative associations. Adds a reference to chapter 308B to
clarify that cooperative associations are included under these sections. |
|
|
No comparable provision (deleted in committee since Article 6, section
13 prohibits new residential relative homesteads after July 1, 2009). |
Section 7. Homestead applications Requires that the spouse of an occupying
relative must also sign, and provide their |
|
|
H.F. 885, Art. 4,
section 8. Same |
Section 8. Trust‑held homesteads. Clarifies that the provisions of this
subdivision, that specify when trust‑held property can qualify for the
homestead classification, applies to personal property as well as real property.
The remaining changes are for readability and clarity. Effective the day
following final enactment. |
|
|
H.F. 885, Art. 4,
section 9. House has same provisions as Senate, except for minor technical
language. Also, House adds language
clarifying that the “2e” (aggregate) classification is only available in
counties that have not elected to opt-out of the aggregate preservation
program. |
Section 9. Class 2 properties. Clarifies that the presence of a minor
structure will not disqualify property from the managed forest land class;
and to provide a May 1 deadline for the applications required from owners of
managed forest land. The remaining changes are for readability and clarity.
Effective the day following final enactment. |
|
|
H.F. 885, Art. 4,
section 10. Same provision |
Section 10. Class 4 properties. Includes
organizations described in IRC '
501(c)(8) in the definition of "community service organizations"
under clause (d)(3) ‑ Class 4c(3); and, to make several technical
clarifications in clause (d)(1) covering seasonal recreational‑residential
properties ‑ i.e., Class 4c(1) ‑ so that the requirements in the
clause apply only to the properties classified therein, instead of to all
class 4c properties. Effective the day following final enactment. |
|
|
H.F. 885, Art. 4,
section 11. Same
provision |
Section 11. Vacant land. Updates
references to section 273.13, subd. 23, which were changed in 2008. The
updates clarify the requirements of current law to classify vacant land
according to its "highest and best " use by adding an exception for
unimproved rural lands, because those lands have a specifically‑designated
classification. Effective the day following final enactment. |
|
|
H.F. 885, Art. 4,
sections 12, 13, and 17. Same provisions |
Sections 12, 13, and 17. Date for sending
utility values to the counties. Changes the date by which the
Department of Revenue must send the ordered and assessed values of pipelines
and electric utilities to the counties from June 30 to August 1. The change
is needed because current timing allows a very short time for review by the
companies and counties prior to issuance of the orders resulting in the
department having to send out revised orders. Effective for assessment year
2009 and thereafter. |
|
|
H.F. 885, Art. 4,
sections 14, 15, and 16. Same provisions |
Sections 14, 15, and 16. County boards of
appeal and equalization. Provides
that if a county board of appeal and equalization or special board of
equalization fails to satisfy the training and quorum requirements, owners
and taxpayers who could have appealed to that board can appeal to the
commissioner. A fee of $500 per tax parcel will be assessed to the county.
Section 14 is effective the day following final enactment. Section 15 is
effective for taxes payable in 2010 and thereafter. Allows county boards of appeal and
equalization to meet for up to ten days after the second Friday in July,
rather than requiring them to meet for a full "ten consecutive
days". Effective the day following final enactment. |
|
|
H.F. 885, Art. 4,
section 18. Overall levy limitations.
Makes changes to three “special levy”
provisions: (i) technical change to special levy for voter-approved debt
levies since they are now levied against a different tax base; (ii) the
special levy for lake improvement district purposes is revised to eliminate
redundant language; and, (iii) the special levy in clause (14) is stricken
because it is obsolete. Effective for
taxes payable in 2009 and thereafter. |
No comparable provision
(levy limits repealed in article 4, section 61) |
|
|
H.F. 885, Art. 4,
section 19. Adjusted levy limit base. Corrects
an erroneous cross-reference.
Effective for taxes payable in 2009, 2010, and 2011. |
No comparable
provision (levy limits repealed in article 4, section 61) |
|
|
H.F. 885, Art. 4,
section 20. Same provision |
Section 18. |
|
|
H.F. 885, Art. 4,
section 21. Same provision |
Section 19. |
|
|
H.F. 885, Art. 4,
sections 22, 23, and 24. Same provisions. |
Sections 20, 21, and 22. Local government
aid. Corrects the placement in the statute of the
$285 minimum amount for city revenue need. This provision was included in
paragraph (c), but should have been placed in paragraph (a) instead. Corrects
a cross‑reference in Minn. Stat. '
477A.011, subd. 42, to the "regional‑center aid base." The
definition of city jobs base refers to the regional center aid base in Minn.
Stat. 477A.011, subd. 36(l); but, the reference should have been to subd.
34(k). Eliminate two internal conflicts with other pre‑existing
provisions by clarifying that the levies used to determine the
minimum/maximum aid‑change caps are the levies for taxes payable in the
year the aid is calculated (i.e., the year prior to the year the aid is
distributed); and, by clarifying that the population data to be used in the
aid calculations are the data available as of July 15 of the year the aid is
calculated. These three sections are effective for aids payable in 2009 and
thereafter. |
|
|
H.F. 885, Art. 4,
section 25. Same provision |
Section 23. Repealer. Repeals Minn. Rules chapter 8115 which are
obsolete rules that applied to levy limits that were repealed in 1997. Effective day following final enactment. |
|
Sec. |
|
Senate Article 13: Department Conditional Use Deeds |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Sections 1 and 7. Classification of tax‑forfeited
lands as conservation or nonconservation. Amends Minn. Stat. § 282.01, subds. 1 and 3. Changes the classification process so that county boards must give notices before classifying or reclassifying properties; while eliminating the requirement that the county board obtain municipal approval of the classification and sale of properties within their borders. Language giving the county the authority to group or subdivide forfeited parcels for sale purposes is moved to this subdivision from subdivision 7, along with new language stating that a county may not subdivide a parcel in order to avoid the restriction that tax‑forfeited parcels with more than 150 feet of waterfront may not be sold without special legislation. Effective July 1, 2009. |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 2. Conveyances to public entities. Amends Minn. Stat. § 82.01, subd. 1a. A new provision allows both state agencies and local units of government to request that parcels be withheld from sale at any time; but prohibits multiple requests within 18 months for the same parcel. Under current law, only municipalities are provided this authority, and only within 60 days following notice from the county board of its intent to classify and sell the property. A new provision allows the county to sell nonconservation tax‑forfeited land to state agencies or local units of government for less than full value for correction of blight and development of affordable housing. The provisions of current law ‑‑ that allow conveyances of nonconservation tax‑forfeited land to local units of government at no cost if the property is put to a "public use" ‑‑ are amended to restrict these authorized public uses to: roads; parks; trails; transitways; beaches; public water‑access; public parking; civic recreation and conference facilities; and, public service facilities such as fire halls, water treatment or delivery systems, and administrative offices. A new provision allows local units of government to obtain nonconservation tax‑forfeited lands at no cost if the local unit was entitled to the parcel prior to forfeiture under a development agreement, but the conveyance failed to occur prior to forfeiture. A new provision allows local units of government to obtain conservation tax‑forfeited lands for less than market value for creation or preservation of wetlands, storm water management, or preservation or restoration of land in its natural state. The deeds under this provision will contain specific language limiting the use of the land to the stated purposes for a minimum of 30 years. Also clarifies that various references to the
"value" of the property in this subdivision mean its market value.
Effective |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 3. Deed of conveyance; form. Amends Minn. Stat. § 282.01, subd. 1c. Provides that the deeds used to convey property at no consideration for an authorized public use are "conditional use deeds." Provides that reversion to the state of
"conditional use deed" property occurs upon the failure to put the
land to the authorized use within the required time or an abandonment of that
use. This clarifies that the subsequently‑prepared
"declarations" of reversion are for notice purposes; and are not
prerequisites for reversion. Effective |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 4. Reverter for failure to use;
conveyance to state. Amends
Minn. Stat. § 282.01, subd. 1d. Clarifies that when property is conveyed to a local unit of government for an authorized public use, and the local unit fails to put the property to that use within three years, the local unit has a duty to either purchase the property or re‑convey it to the state in trust for the local taxing authorities. Eliminates the provision under which the use‑restriction is terminated if the local unit conveys the property under an authority granted to it in Minn. Stat. ch. 469 (Economic Development). Adds a provision to allow local units to consider the use‑restrictions met for a parcel of property that has been conveyed to them for an authorized public use if a formal plan of that unit shows an intent to use the land for the authorized public use. Adds a provision allowing local units to acquire a fee interest in use‑restricted parcels after 15 years without having to purchase the property if: the parcel is actually being used as intended; the local unit has no plans to change that use; and, the county board approves. The
"sunsets" are: (i) 40 years after the date of the deed (beginning
on |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 5. Conditional use deed fees. Amends Minn. Stat. § 282.01, by adding the
new subdivision 1g. Imposes a fee on applications for conditional use deeds
submitted to the commissioner. If the application is denied, the fee is $100.
If the application is granted, the fee is $250. The remaining amounts of the
fees each fiscal year are appropriated to the Commissioner of Revenue to pay
the expenses of administering the conditional use deed laws. Effective for
applications received by the commissioner after |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 6. Conservation lands; county
supervision. Amends Minn. Stat. § 282.01, subd. 2.
Reorganizes the provisions; but also eliminates the authority of the county
board, with approval from the Commissioner of Natural Resources, to sell
conservation lands for timber production under the provisions applicable to
nonconservation land if the land is located within an unincorporated area and
is zoned by the county for a compatible restricted use. This authority is no
longer needed. Effective |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Sections 8 and 10. Sale; method,
requirements, effects. Amends Minn. Stat. § 282.01, subds. 4 and
7a. Grants counties the authority to sell tax‑forfeited lands to the
public for less than the appraised value when the property consists of
undivided interests; parcels that cannot be improved under zoning ordinances
due to their size, shape, or lack of access; and, parcels were there is no
zoning, but the physical characteristics of the land indicate that the best
use would be to combine it with an adjoining parcel. Effective |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 9. County sales; notice, purchase
price, disposition. Amends
Minn. Stat. § 282.01, subd. 7. Clarifies that the public sale provisions of
this statute apply to parcels of nonconservation tax‑forfeited land.
Effective |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 11. Cross reference. Amends Minn. Stat. § 287.2205 ‑ having
to do with the deed tax ‑ to eliminate a reference to Minn. Stat. § 282.01,
subd. 1b, which is being repealed in the next section of the bill. Effective |
|
|
No comparable provision |
Section 12. Repealer. Repeals the following: Minn. Stat. § 282.01, subd. 1b. This provision allows conveyances of tax‑forfeited land within "targeted neighborhoods" (defined in Minn. Stat. § 469.201) for no consideration upon approval by the county board. After the amendments in this bill, Minn. Stat. § 282.01, subd. 1a, will allow essentially the same thing in that the county boards will have a new authority for reduced‑price sales to correct blight or develop affordable housing. Minn. Stat. § 282.01,
subds. 9, 10, and 11. These subdivisions allow the Commissioner of Revenue to
ratify pre‑1943 sales of tax‑forfeited lands made under Mason's
Supplement 1940, section 2139‑15, that were done without a separate
appraisal of the value of the standing timber (a separate appraisal of
standing timber is still required under current laws). These sale‑ratification‑provisions
are believed to be obsolete. Effective |
|
Sec. |
HF 885, Art. 6, as passed by House Tax Committee (April 29) and sent to Floor |
Senate Article 14: Department Miscellaneous |
|
|
H.F. No. 885
(first engrossment), article 6, section 1 is similar, but does
not specify the permitted return information that may be disclosed. |
Section 1. Disclosure to law enforcement
authorities of harassment. Amends Minn. Stat. § 270B.14, subd. 16, to
include harassment as an additional circumstance under which tax return
information can be disclosed to law enforcement authorities. Under current
law, the Department of Revenue can apprise law enforcement authorities of
circumstances involving the threat of death or physical injury to someone.
There are other situations where, as part of a tax case, the department may
become aware that a taxpayer is harassing someone or is being harassed by
another person to the point where notifying law enforcement is necessary for
protection. This includes the harassment of a Department of Revenue employee.
Harassment is defined as purposeful conduct directed at an individual, and
causing them to feel frightened, threatened, oppressed, persecuted, or
intimidated. |
|
|
H.F. No. 885
(first engrossment), article 6, section 2 is same. |
Section 2. Amends |
|
|
H.F. No. 885
(first engrossment), article 6, sections 3 and 4 are same. |
Sections 3 and 4. Publication of names of
tax prepares subject to penalties. Amends Minn. Stat. § 270C.446, subds. 2 and 5, to clarify that a
tax preparer who is subject to publication due to criminal penalty must have
been a preparer with respect to the return or claim from which the criminal
penalty arose and that the preparer must demonstrate to the commissioner that
conditions for removal from the list have been met, including satisfaction of
any sentence imposed. Effective the day following final enactment. |
|
|
H.F. No. 885
(first engrossment), article 6, section 5 is same. |
Section 5. Personal liability for penalty
and interest assessments procedure. Amends Minn. Stat. § 270C.56, subd. 1, to clarify that all
applicable penalties and interest may be assessed for personal liability in
the same manner as the underlying tax. This clarifies that the personal
liability assessment of penalties and interest is treated consistently for
all taxes subject to personal liability assessment and parallels language
that existed prior to various recodifications of the state tax laws which
have occurred over the last several years. Effective the day following final
enactment. |
|
|
H.F. No. 885
(first engrossment), article 6, section 6 is same. |
Section 6. Bankruptcy; suspension of time
clarification. Amends
Minn. Stat. § 289A.41 to make a technical correction to clarify the
application of the statute. Clarifies that the notice requirement applies to
the termination or expiration of the automatic stay, as well as notice that
the bankruptcy proceedings have been closed or dismissed. Effective the day
following final enactment. |