![]() |
|
| House | Senate | Joint Departments and Commissions | Bill Search and Status | Statutes, Laws, and Rules |
House Research Bill Summary
File Number: H.F. 1602
Date:
March 31, 2005
Version: As amended by H1602DE1
Status: Public Safety Policy and Finance Committee
Authors: Smith
Subject: Sentencing - Upward Durational Departures (Blakely)
Analyst:
Judie Zollar (651-296-1554)
Rebecca Pirius (651-296-5044)
This publication can be made
available in alternative formats upon request.
Please call 651-296-6753 (voice); or the Minnesota State Relay Service
at 1-800-627-3529 (TTY) for assistance.
Summaries are also available on our website at: www.house.mn/hrd/hrd.htm.
This amendment make substantive and procedural changes to sentencing law in response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004). In Blakely , the Court said that it was unconstitutional under a person's sixth amendment right to a jury trial to allow a court to make findings of fact that would increase the sentence for an offense beyond the sentencing guidelines presumptive sentence. The Court held that the government must prove to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt every aggravating factor that would justify an increase in the defendant's sentence beyond the presumptive sentence (except for the fact of a prior conviction). Minnesota's appellate courts have limited Blakely's holding to increases in sentence length only; therefore, Blakely does not apply to upward dispositional departures; i.e., a court's decision to send a person to prison in lieu of a presumptive stayed sentence.
The amendment increases the presumptive range of sentences allowable under the sentencing guidelines without a departure, establishes procedures to govern a jury's finding of aggravating factors and the court's imposition of an upward departure, and deletes language in various statutes that refers to the court being able to impose a longer sentence on its own. The bill is effective August 1, 2005, for crimes committed on or after that date.
|
1
|
Promulgation of
sentencing guidelines.
Changes the current allowable presumptive
sentencing range under the sentencing guidelines that allows a range from 15%
below to 15% above the presumptive, fixed sentence in each grid. Replaces it with a provision requiring the
guidelines to reflect a new presumptive sentencing range from 15% below the
presumptive, fixed sentence to 100% above the presumptive, fixed
sentence. This change allows judges
greater discretion in sentencing as they will be able to impose up to double
the current fixed, presumptive sentence.
This change means there will likely be fewer cases in which
prosecutors will need to prove specific factors to a jury in order to obtain
a longer sentence. |
|
2
|
Deviation from guidelines.
Proscribes a court from imposing a sentence duration in excess of that
provided by the guidelines unless the finder of fact has found that
aggravating factors exist. Requires a court to impose a sentence in excess of
the presumptive range if aggravating factors are found. |
|
3
|
Aggravated departures.
Requires
the state to provide reasonable notice to the defendant and the court if the
state intends to rely on factors other than those specified in the sentencing
guidelines in seeking an aggravated departure. |
|
4
|
Procedures in cases where the state intends
to seek an aggravated durational departure.
Mandates a sentencing
hearing upon timely notice by the state that it will seek a durational
departure from the sentencing guidelines. Requires a unitary trial if the
evidence in support of an aggravated departure would be admissible in a trial
in support of the elements of the offense or would not result in unfair
prejudice to the defendant, and provides for a bifurcated trial otherwise.
Allows the prosecutor to request a bifurcated trial. States that the existence of an
aggravating factor must be determined by special verdict. |
|
5
|
Defendants to present evidence and
argument.
Allows the defendant to present rebuttal evidence regarding
whether facts exist that would justify an aggravated departure. A defendant is not allowed to present
evidence or argument to the jury or fact finder regarding facts in support of
a mitigated departure during the trial, but may present evidence and argument
in support of a mitigated departure to the judge as fact finder during a sentencing
hearing. |
|
6
|
Waiver of jury determination.
Permits a
defendant to waive the right to a jury determination of aggravating factors.
Upon waiver, the court shall determine beyond a reasonable doubt whether
factors exist that support the state's motion for an aggravated departure. |
|
7
|
Notice of information regarding predatory
offenders.
Restates verbatim the existing law formerly in subdivision 2a
of section 244.10, which is repealed by this bill. This change puts the new language related to upward dispositional
departures together in sequence in the statute. |
|
8
|
Computation of criminal history score.
Restates
verbatim the existing law formerly in subdivision 3 of section 244.10, which
is repealed by this bill. This change
puts the new language related to upward dispositional departures together in
sequence in the statute. |
|
9
|
Mandatory increased sentence.
Replaces
language in current law requiring the court to impose a sentence that is a
not less than double the presumptive sentence to provide that the sentence
shall not be less than the high end of the new presumptive sentencing range
(see section 1). This sentence
applies to commission of a "predatory crime" motivated by an offender's
sexual impulses or part of a predatory pattern of behavior that had criminal
sexual conduct as its goal. |
|
10
|
Mandatory 30-year sentence.
Requires
the court to impose a 30-year sentence under certain circumstances if a
person is a repeat sex offender. The person must have a previous sex offense
conviction for first-, second-, or third-degree criminal sexual conduct and
be subject to sentencing for a conviction of first- or second-degree criminal
sexual conduct involving force or violence. Eliminates the current
requirement that the court determine whether aggravating factors exist that
would provide grounds for an upward departure. |
|
11
|
Minimum departure for sex offenders.
Replaces
language in current law requiring the court to impose a sentence that is a
not less than double the presumptive sentence to provide that the sentence shall
not be less than the high end of the new presumptive sentencing range (see
section 1) if the person is convicted of first- or second-degree criminal
sexual conduct involving force or violence.
Also provides that the factfinder shall determine whether aggravating
factors exist. Current law allows the court to determine whether aggravating
factors exist. |
|
12
|
Increased sentences for dangerous offender
who commits a third violent crime.
Deletes language requiring certain
findings before the court may impose an aggravated durational departure in
situations where an offender commits a third violent crime. |
|
13
|
Increased sentence for offender who commits
a sixth felony.
Deletes language requiring the court to
determine the present offense is a felony committed as part of a pattern of
criminal conduct before the court may impose an aggravated durational
departure on an offender who commits a sixth felony offense. |
|
14
|
Instruction to Sentencing Guidelines
Commission.
Subd. 1. Presumptive, fixed sentence maintained.
Requires the court to retain in each cell
of the sentencing guidelines grid the presumptive, fixed sentence in place at
the time of enactment of this legislation, except that the commission shall
make changes to presumptive, fixed sentences consistent with 2005 legislation
and/or timely modifications proposed by the sentencing guidelines commission.
Subd. 2.
Expansion of presumptive sentencing range.
Consistent with section 1, requires the guidelines commission to
expand the sentencing range in each cell of the grid to 85 to 200 percent of
the presumptive, fixed sentence.
Subd. 3. Additional modifications to sentencing
guidelines.
Directs the commission to amend the
guidelines and comments to provide that a court may depart upward from the
presumptive sentencing range when aggravating circumstances justify such a
departure. |
|
15
|
Revisor's instruction.
Subd. 1. Headnote change.
Instructs the Revisor to change the heading of section 609.108 from
"Mandatory Increased Sentences for Certain Patterned and Predatory Sex
Offenders; No Prior Conviction Required" to "Mandatory Increased Sentences
for Certain Predatory Sex Offenders; No Prior Conviction Required."
Subd. 2.
Repealer; reference to renumbering.
Instructs the Revisor to
include a reference next to the repealer of provisions in the bill that are
being renumbered to inform the reader of the renumbering of those provisions. |
|
16
|
Repealer.
Repeals section 244.10,
subdivisions 2 a and 3, as explained in sections 7 and 8. Also repeals section 609.108, subdivision
4, relating to "danger to public safety." See section 3. |