House Research Bill Summary
File Number:
H.F. 7,
First Special Session
Date:
May 29, 2003
Version: 1st Engrossment
Status: As Passed by the House
Authors: Abrams
Subject: Tax Omnibus Bill
Analyst:
Joel Michael, 651-296-5056 Karen
Baker, 651-296-8959
Steve Hinze, 651-296-8956 Pat
Dalton, 651-296-7434
Nina Manzi, 651-296-5204
Matt Massman, 651-296-7171 (House Fiscal Analysis Department)
This publication can be made available in alternative formats upon request. Please call 651-296-6753 (voice); or the Minnesota State Relay Service at 1-800-627-3529 (TTY) for assistance. Summaries are also available on our website at: www.house.leg.state.mn.us/hrd/hrd.htm.
Table of Contents
Bill
Page
Article 1: Job Opportunity Building Zones
.............................................. 2
Article
2: Biotechnology and Health Science
Zones
.............................. 40
Article
3: Federal Update
.................................................................... 63
Article
4: Property Taxes
..................................................................... 68
Article 5: City Aids
.............................................................................. 91
Article
6: Other Intergovernmental Aids
............................................. 107
Article
7: Levy Limits
........................................................................ 121
Article
8: Sales and Use Tax
.............................................................. 130
Article
9: Special Taxes
..................................................................... 146
Article
10: Local Economic Development
.......................................... 156
Article
11: Miscellaneous
................................................................... 173
Article 1: Job Opportunity Building Zones
Overview
This article authorizes the commissioner of the department of trade and economic development (DTED) to designate up to10 job opportunity building zones in economically distressed rural areas. These zones could be divided up into separate noncontiguous subzones, located in one or more local government units. Qualifying businesses operating in the zones are exempt from sales, income, and property taxes and a refundable jobs credit is available for the portion of increased payroll that exceeds $30,000 per FTE. Individuals who invested in zone businesses would be exempt on their business income attributable to activity in the zone, as well as capital gain taxes on zone investments. The zones would have a maximum duration of 12 years. Designations would occur in 2003 and the tax reductions would be effective in 2004. The commissioner may reserve some of the zones for designation in calendar year 2004. In addition, the article authorizes designation of up to 5 agricultural processing facility zones. These zones would be limited to the sites of the agricultural processing facilities themselves. |
||||||||||||||||
|
1
|
Job opportunity
building zone property.
Provides
that commercial and industrial property (both real and personal) in a job
opportunity building zone or an agricultural processing zone is exempt from
property taxation. This exemption
does not apply, however, to the following:
}
Land
}
Commercial-industrial property where neither the
owner nor the lessee is a qualified business
(See the summary of section 15
for the definition of a qualified business.)
}
Debt service levies for general obligation
bonds
}
School operating referenda, if the voters
approved the levy before designation of the zone.
The
exemption applies to the first assessment year after designation of the zone
by the commissioner of trade and economic development. |
|||||||||||||||
|
2
|
Wind energy production
tax exemption.
Provides that electricity generated in a
job opportunity building zone is not subject to the wind energy production
tax. This tax is imposed in lieu of
the property tax. |
|||||||||||||||
|
3
|
Individual income tax exemption.
Provides
that income derived from investing in or operating a qualified business in a
job opportunity building zone is exempt from individual income taxation. The qualifying rules for these exemptions
are described in section 21
.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
4
|
Corporation franchise tax exemption. Provides income from operating a qualified business in a job opportunity building zone is deductible in calculating taxable income under the corporate franchise tax. The details of this exemption are described in the summary of section 22 . |
|||||||||||||||
|
5
|
Individual income tax exemption, nonresidents.
Provides that in calculating the Minnesota
tax for a non-resident, job opportunity building zone income is excluded from
both the numerator and denominator of the ratio. Nonresidents calculate their Minnesota tax by determining the
Minnesota tax on their total income (both Minnesota and non-Minnesota). The Minnesota liability is, then,
determined by multiplying this amount by a fraction, the numerator of which
is Minnesota source income and the denominator of which is total income. |
|||||||||||||||
|
6
|
Jobs credit.
Provides that the jobs credit
applies against chapter 290 taxes (regular and alternative minimum tax under
both the individual income and corporate franchise taxes). A summary of the rules for this credit is
found in section
23
. |
|||||||||||||||
|
7
|
Dependent care credit.
Clarifies
that tax-exempt job opportunity building zone income reduces the amount of
the dependent care credit that is allowed.
For example, if one-quarter of the taxpayer's income were tax-exempt
job opportunity building income, the otherwise applicable dependent care
credit would be reduced by 25 percent.
This is the same treatment that applies to tax-exempt reservation
income of American Indians and to part year residents. |
|||||||||||||||
|
8
|
Working family credit.
Clarifies
that tax-exempt job opportunity building zone income reduces the amount of
the working family credit that is allowed.
This is the same treatment described in section 7
for the dependent care credit and is consistent
with the treatment of other forms of tax-exempt income. |
|||||||||||||||
|
9
|
Individual AMT exemption. Extends the individual income tax exemption to the alternative minimum tax or AMT under the individual income tax. |
|||||||||||||||
|
10
|
Corporate AMT exemption. Exempts income from operating a business in a job opportunity building zone from the corporate AMT. |
|||||||||||||||
|
11
|
Minimum fee, complete exemption.
Exempts a business from the minimum fee if all of its property and
payroll is located in a job opportunity building zone. |
|||||||||||||||
|
12
|
Corporate minimum fee. Excludes property and payroll located in a job opportunity building zone from use in calculation of the minimum fee under the corporate franchise tax. This exemption applies to a business that has property and payroll outside of the zone. |
|||||||||||||||
|
13
|
Sales tax exemption. Provides a sales tax exemption for businesses located in a job opportunity building zone. To qualify for this exemption, the goods or taxable services must be primarily used in the zone and purchased during the duration of the zone. The exemption extends to contractor purchases (if the final use of the property is in the zone) and to local sales taxes. |
|||||||||||||||
|
14
|
Motor vehicle sales tax exemption. Provides an exemption from the motor vehicle sales tax for vehicles used by a business in a job opportunity building zone. The vehicle must be both garaged in the zone and primarily used in support of zone operations of the business (e.g., delivering products produced in the zone or delivering supplies used in the zone). The exemption also applies to local sales taxes. |
|||||||||||||||
|
15
|
Definitions.
Defines terms for purposes of
the job opportunity building zone statute.
}
Agricultural processing facility means a facility that
transforms, packages, sorts, or grades agricultural, livestock, or plant
products into goods for intermediate or final consumption.
}
Applicant is a local government or governments applying for designation of a job
opportunity building zone. A joint
powers board, acting on behalf of two or more local government units, may be
an applicant.
}
Commissioner
is the commissioner of trade and economic
development.
}
Development plan is a development plan adopted by the local
government as part of its application for designation of a job opportunity
building zone.
}
Job opportunity building zone is a zone designated under the statute's
procedure and includes an agricultural processing zone.
}
Job opportunity building zone percentage is a fraction used to
apportion income to zone for business operating both within and outside of
the zone. The percentage is the
average of the zone payrolls and property over total Minnesota payrolls and
property.
}
Job opportunity building zone payroll factor is the wages and
salaries paid to employees for services performed in the zone or to employees
working from offices in a zone, if the work outside the zone is incidental to
that in the zone.
}
Local government unit is a city (either home rule charter or statutory),
county, town, iron range resources and rehabilitation agency, regional
development commission, or federally designated economic development
district.
}
Person means an individual or any type of legal entity (corporation,
partnership, etc.).
}
Qualified business means a trade or business operating within a job
opportunity building zone. If a
business relocates operations into a zone, to be a qualified business it must
both:
·
Meet an expansion test by either:
§
Increasing employment by 20% in its first full year of zone operations
and maintaining that level of employment during the duration of the zone; or
§
Making a capital investment in the zone equal to 10% of its gross
revenues in the prior year from the portion of the business it relocated to
the zone; and
·
Agree in writing to repay the tax benefits, if it does not meet the
expansion test.
}
Relocates means moving a Minnesota business operation from outside a zone into a
zone or by locating an operation in a zone that supplants employment at an
existing Minnesota business operation outside the zone. It does not include an expansion that does
not replace or supplant another Minnesota operation. |
|||||||||||||||
|
16
|
Development plan.
Requires applicants for
zone designation to adopt a written development plan containing at least:
}
A map of the zone with details on present uses and conditions in the
area
}
Evidence of community support and commitments to the zone
}
Description of the plans and methods that will be used to stimulate
development of the zone
}
Description of the characteristics of the zone (e.g., social, economic,
and demographic conditions)
}
Description of the anticipated activity in the zone
}
Any other information the commissioner requires. |
|||||||||||||||
|
17
|
Limitations.
Establishes various rules
governing job opportunity building zones:
}
Maximum size is limited to 5,000 acres. For an agricultural processing facility
zone, the maximum size is limited to the site of the facility, including
space for ancillary facilities and expansion in the "reasonably foreseeable
future."
}
A zone may be divided into noncontiguous subzones.
}
Zones must be located outside of the Twin Cities (7 county)
metropolitan area.
}
A zone cannot overlap with a border city development zone. A border city can, however, choose to seek
designation of the area of a border city development zone as a job
opportunity building zone by providing for removal of property from the
border city zone. If property owners
in the existing zone are receiving incentives under it, they must consent to
the removal. The removal can be
contingent upon designation of the zone as a job opportunity building
zone. Border city development zone
incentives cannot be provided to businesses for operations in a job
opportunity building zone.
}
The maximum duration of a zone is 12 years. A
shorter duration can be requested by the applicant or specified by DTED in
its designation of the zone. |
|||||||||||||||
|
18
|
Application for designation of zones.
Provides rules governing applications for zone
designations. Who may apply.
One or more local
governments (city or town, county, and school district) may apply for
designation of a zone. The zone must
be located, at least partially, in each of the applicant governmental
units. A local government can apply
for only one zone designation. Contents of application.
The
application must include:
}
A development plan for the zone
}
The proposed duration of the zone
}
Resolutions approving the application by all of the cities, towns, and
counties that include the zone (This
is essentially an agreement to provide the local tax reductions-i.e.,
property tax or local sales tax exemptions.)
}
Consents to removals, if the proposed zone includes a border city
development zone
}
Supporting evidence to help the commissioner of DTED evaluate the
merits of the application
}
An agreement by the local government to follow the business subsidy law
for tax incentives that are provided to businesses in the zones. |
|||||||||||||||
|
19
|
Designation of job opportunity building zones.
Directs the commissioner of DTED to designate no
more than 10 job opportunity building zones.
These designations are to be made based on need and likelihood of
success in revitalizing economically distressed rural areas in
Minnesota. The commissioner may also
designate up to 5 agricultural processing facility zones. In designating the zones, the commissioner
may modify the development plans, including the boundaries of the zones. Notice and a statement of reasons must be
provided to the applicant for any modifications. Need indicators.
The commissioner must
consider the following measures of need (generally measured relative to the
averages for the state as a whole):
}
Percentage of the population below 200% of the poverty rate
}
Average weekly wage
}
Deteriorating or underutilized property
}
Median sale price of housing units
}
Median household income
}
Population loss in the last two decades
}
Closing of businesses or major employers
}
Physical characteristics of property that it make it difficult to
develop
}
Presence of existing public and private infrastructure to support
expanded development
}
Low business startup and expansion rates
In
applying these indicators, the best available data is to be used. If data that is specific to the zone is
not available, the commissioner may use data for the next smallest area that
is available. Success indicators.
The commissioner may use
the following as measures of likely success of a proposed zone:
}
Viability of the development plan
}
How creative and innovative the plan is
}
Local public and private commitment to the effort
}
Existing resources available in the zone
}
Relationship of the designation to other projects and programs
}
How regulatory burdens will be eased in the zone
}
Job training efforts that will be linked to the designation
}
The extent to which the plan is directed at and the designation of the
zone will result in high paying jobs Schedule.
The designations are to
be made during calendar year 2003 and will take effect beginning January 1,
2004. The bill sets out the following
schedule related to the designations:
}
DTED must specify the rules for applications by August 1, 2003.
}
The application deadline is October 15, 2003.
}
DTED must designate the zones by December 31, 2003.
DTED
can reserve designation of some of the zones for a second round of
designations in calendar year 2004.
DTED will set the schedule for these designations, except that it must
allow at least 90 days for local governments to apply for designations. Geographic distribution. Sets a goal of distributing zones around the state. Ruling making exemption.
The commissioner's actions in
administering the program (e.g., setting application requirements and so
forth) are not subject to rule making procedures under the Administrative
Procedures Act. |
|||||||||||||||
|
20
|
Available tax incentives.
The
following tax incentives are available in job opportunity building zones:
}
Business owners are exempt from the individual income tax on income
from business operations and investments in a job opportunity building zone
}
The corporate franchise tax does not apply to corporate income
generated by zone operations
}
State and local sales taxes (both general and on motor vehicles) do not
apply to purchases used by businesses in a job opportunity building zone
}
Property taxes do not apply to improvements in the zone } The wind energy production tax does not apply to wind energy conversion systems in a zone } A refundable jobs credit is available for higher paying jobs. |
|||||||||||||||
|
21
|
Individual income tax exemption. Provides income tax exemptions for individuals operating businesses in zones or investing in zones. These exemptions only apply if the income would otherwise be taxable. Rents.
Rents received for both
real and tangible personal property located in the zone are exempt. Rents from personal property that is used
both within and outside of the zone must be apportioned based on the number
of days the property was used in the zone. Business income.
Income from operating a
business in a job opportunity building zone is exempt. If the business operates both within and
outside of the zone, the income must be apportioned using the share of
property and payroll located in the zone to the total property and payroll of
the taxpayer. The exemption is
limited so that the exempt income (determined by using the apportionment
mechanism) cannot exceed 20 percent of the sum of the zone payroll and
original adjusted basis of the investment in the zone. Capital gains.
Capital gains on real
and tangible personal property located in a job opportunity building zone or
sale of a business operated in the zone are exempt from taxation. Different rules apply to determine the
amount of the exemption:
}
Real property.
Capital
gains on real property located in a job opportunity building zone are exempt
from taxation based on the share of the holding period that took place while
the area was designated a job opportunity building zone. To illustrate, assume A purchased a piece
of real property for $1,000 and held the property for 10 years. A, then, sold the property for
$5,000. For 6 years of the 10-year
holding period, the property was located in a job opportunity building zone. Of A's $4,000 capital gain ($5,000 sale
price - $1,000 purchase price = $4,000), 60 percent or $2,400 would be exempt
from taxation ($4,000 * 60% = $2,400), since 6 years out of the 10-year
holding period occurred while the zone was designated a job opportunity
building zone. } Tangible personal property. Capital gains on tangible personal property located in a job opportunity building zone are exempt from taxation based on the share of the holding period that took place while the zone was designated a job opportunity building zone and the usage of the property in the zone. This calculation is essentially the same as that for real property. However, if the personal property was used both within and without the zone, the exemption amount must also be multiplied by a fraction. The numerator of the fraction is the number of days the property was used in the zone while it was designated as a job opportunity building zone and the denominator is the total number of days the taxpayer held the property. } Ownership in qualified business. Capital gain on an ownership interest (e.g., stock or a partnership interest) in a qualified business is exempt from taxation. This exemption equals the job opportunity building zone percentage for the business multiplied by the capital gain. The zone percentage is calculated using as its denominator the total property and payroll (not just the Minnesota payroll and property). This exemption does not apply if the zone percentage is less than 25 percent. The business entity is responsible for notifying the owner of its qualification for the capital gain exemption. |
|||||||||||||||
|
22
|
Corporate franchise tax exemption.
Provides
that a corporation operating in the zone is exempt from the corporate
franchise tax, if it is a qualified business. If the entire business operates in the zone, the corporation is
fully exempt from taxation under the corporate franchise tax and would not be
required to file a return. If the
corporation does business both within and outside of the zone, the following
rules apply:
}
Regular tax.
The corporation's
taxable net income is multiplied by its zone percentage (average property and
payroll in the zone divided by total Minnesota property and payroll) and
subtracted from its taxable income. } AMT. The corporation's alternative minimum taxable income is multiplied by the zone percentage and this amount is subtracted from alternative minimum taxable income. } Minimum fee. Its zone property and payroll are excluded from calculating the minimum fee. |
|||||||||||||||
|
23
|
Jobs Credit. Provides a job credit to a qualified business operating in a zone equal to 7 percent of: } The lesser of either: · The increase in the business payroll in the zone since the year of designation or · The increases in total Minnesota payroll since the year of designation; minus } The increase in the number of FTEs in the zone since designation multiplied by $30,000 Inflation adjustment. Starting for tax year 2005, the $30,000 amount will adjusted for inflation. Refundable. The credit is refundable. |
|||||||||||||||
|
24
|
Repayment of tax benefits.
Requires a
business to repay tax benefits or any non-tax amounts provided by the local
governments, if the business:
}
Did not meet the goals specified in a business subsidy agreement. The commissioner can extend by a year the
time to meet the agreed goals.
}
Ceased to operate in the zone or was not a qualified business.
The
provision requires repayment of the last two years of benefits received
before the business ceased its zone operations or failed to meet its agreed
goals. Repayment could be required
after termination of the zone. Disposition or repayments.
Repayments of state tax
reductions are paid to the state and deposited in the general fund. Repayments of property taxes are
distributed to local governments in the same manner as delinquent property
taxes. Repayments of local sales
taxes are made to the unit imposing the tax. Authority to collect.
The
commissioner of revenue is given authority to collect repayments in the same
manner as unpaid taxes and the same interest and penalty rules apply. For individual income and corporate
franchise taxes, the taxpayer files an amended return and must repay within
30 days after the triggering event.
For property taxes, the county auditor is to prepare a tax statement
using the otherwise applicable tax rates.
If the amounts are not paid, they become liens against the property in
the same way as any other unpaid property tax. Motor vehicle sales taxes are repaid to the motor vehicle
registrar. Waiver authority.
The commissioner of revenue,
after consulting with the commissioner of DTED and the affected local units
of government, may waive all or part of a repayment if it is deemed to be in
the best interest of the state and the business ceased operations for reasons
beyond its control, such as a natural disaster, unforeseen industry trends,
or loss of a major supplier or customer. |
|||||||||||||||
|
25
|
Zone performance; remedies.
Successful applicants for zone designation must annually report to the
commissioner on zone performance and compliance with the business subsidy
law. Based on these reports and other
information, the commissioner may take action the commissioner considers
appropriate, such as removing property from the zone or terminating the zone
or a subzone. Before doing so, the
commissioner must consult with the local governments and provide notice of
the proposed action. The
commissioner's action may be appealed as a contested case under the
administrative procedures act. Income
and property tax incentives provided in area removed from a zone or
terminated zone continue for existing businesses. Sales tax exemptions continue for purchases made before the beginning
the first calendar month beginning 30 days after termination of the zone or
removal of the property. |
|||||||||||||||
|
26
|
Job opportunity building zone aid.
Provides
for the payment of state aid to partially reimburse cities and counties with
job opportunity building zones for a proportionately large loss of tax base
as a result of the zones. To qualify
for this aid, a city or county must experience at least a 3% drop in tax
capacity (as compared with a base year of 2003) as a result of the property
tax exemption provided through the job opportunity building zone. The amount of aid is calculated using the
following formula:
0.5 * local unit's rate in 2003
* [job opportunity building zone exempt tax capacity - (0.03 * 2003 tax
capacity)] Certification by assessor.
The county
assessor is to certify entitlements to this aid to the commissioner of
revenue. The commissioner notifies
each city and county of its entitlement to aid by August 20 of the assessment
year. The aid is paid by July 20 of
the payable year. An appropriation is
made to the commissioner of revenue for the aid. |
|||||||||||||||
|
27
|
Appropriations.
Appropriates the
following amounts to DTED and DOR for the costs of administering the zone
program:
|
|||||||||||||||
Article 2: Biotechnology and Health Science Zones
Overview
This article authorizes the commissioner of the department of trade and economic development (DTED) to designate one biotechnology and health science industry zone. In designating the zone, priority is given to locations close to and connected with a higher education or research institution, such as the Mayo Clinic or University of Minnesota. This zone could be divided up into separate noncontiguous subzones, located in one or more local government units. Qualifying businesses engaged in biotechnology or health sciences and operating in the zone may qualify for sales tax exemptions, corporate franchise tax exemptions, job credits, research credits, and property tax exemptions. The commissioner of DTED awards these incentives upon application by the businesses. The total amount of the state tax incentives is limited to $1 million. The zone would have a maximum duration of 12 years. Designations would occur in 2003 and the tax reductions would be effective in 2004. |
|
|
1
|
Legislative findings.
Makes
legislative findings on the desirability of providing incentives to
biotechnology and health science industries to locate close to the University
of Minnesota and the Mayo Clinic. The
findings require that encouraging expansion of the industry include attention
to the ethical, legal, and societal impacts of the industry.
|
|
2
|
Biotechnology and
health science industry zone property.
Provides
that commercial and industrial property (both real and personal) in a
biotechnology and health science industry zone is exempt from property
taxation. This exemption does not
apply, however, to the following:
}
Land
}
Commercial-industrial property where neither the owner nor the lessee
is a qualified business (See the
summary below for section 9
for the definition of a qualified business.)
}
Debt service levies for general obligation bonds
}
School operating referenda, if the voters approved the levy before
designation of the zone.
The
exemption applies to the first assessment year after designation of the zone
by the commissioner of trade and economic development. The city and county can opt to not provide
an exemption from their taxes. The
exemption would apply in all cases to school and other special district
property taxes (other than debt and referendum operating levies as noted
above). |
|
3
|
Corporation franchise tax exemption. Provides income from operating a qualified business in a biotechnology and health science industry zone is deductible in calculating taxable income under the corporate franchise tax. The details of this exemption are described in the summary of section 16 . |
|
4
|
Job credit.
Allows the job credit under
section 17
to reduce corporate franchise tax liability. |
|
5
|
Research credit.
Allows the research credit
under section 18
to reduce corporate franchise tax liability. |
|
6
|
Corporate AMT exemption. Exempts income from operating a business in a biotechnology and health science industry zone from the corporate AMT. |
|
7
|
Corporate minimum fee. Excludes property and payroll located in a biotechnology and health science industry zone from use in calculation of the minimum fee under the corporate franchise tax. This fee applies to partnerships and S corporations, as well as traditional C corporations, that are subject to the franchise tax. |
|
8
|
Sales tax exemption. Provides a sales tax exemption for businesses located in a biotechnology and health science industry zone. To qualify for this exemption, the goods or taxable services must be primarily used in the zone and purchased during the duration of the zone. The exemption extends to contractor purchases (if the final use of the property is in the zone) and to local sales taxes. The tax will be paid by the purchaser and application made to the commissioner of revenue for a refund under the capital equipment refund provisions. The refund of state tax cannot exceed the amount of the credit certificates allocated to the qualified business. |
|
9
|
Definitions.
Defines terms for purposes of
the biotechnology and health science industry zone statute.
}
Applicant is a local government or governments applying for designation of a
biotechnology and health science industry zone. A joint powers board, acting on behalf of two or more local
government units, may be an applicant.
}
Biotechnology and health science industry facility means a facility
involved in either (1) researching, developing or manufacturing a
biotechnology product or service, (2) researching, developing, or
manufacturing (or any combination of them) a biotechnology medical device
product or service, or (3) promoting, supplying or servicing a facility
engaged in activities under (1) or (2), if it derives more than 50 percent of
its gross receipts from those types of businesses.
}
Commissioner
is the commissioner of trade and economic
development.
}
Development plan is a development plan adopted by the local
government as part of its application for designation of a biotechnology and
health science industry zone.
}
Biotechnology and health science industry zone is a zone designated
under the statute's procedure.
}
Biotechnology and health science industry zone
percentage is a
fraction used to apportion income to the zone for qualified businesses
operating both within and outside of the zone. The percentage is the average of the zone payrolls and property
over total Minnesota payrolls and property.
}
Biotechnology and health science industry zone
payroll factor is
the wages and salaries paid to employees for services performed for a
qualified business in the zone or to employees working from offices of a
qualified business in a zone, if the work outside the zone is incidental to
that in the zone.
}
Local government unit is a city (either home rule charter or statutory),
county, town, or school district. } Person means an individual or any type of legal entity (corporation, partnership, etc.). } Qualified business means a trade or business operating at a biotechnology and health science industry facility within a biotechnology and health science industry zone. If a business relocates operations into a zone, to be a qualified business it must both:
·
Meet an expansion test by either:
§
Increasing employment by 20% in its first full year of zone operations
and maintaining that level of employment for each year the zone designation
applies; or
§
Making a capital investment in the zone equal to 10% of its gross
revenues in the prior year from the portion of the business it relocated to
the zone; and
·
Agree in writing to repay the tax benefits, if it does not satisfy the
test.
}
Relocates means moving a Minnesota business operation from outside a zone into a
zone or by locating an operation in a zone that supplants employment at an
existing Minnesota business operation outside the zone. It does not include an expansion that does
not replace or supplant another Minnesota operation. |
|
10
|
Development plan.
Requires applicants for
zone designation to adopt a written development plan containing at least:
}
A map of the zone with details on present uses and conditions in the
area
}
Evidence of community support and commitments to the zone
}
Description of the plans and methods that will be used to stimulate
development of the zone
}
Description of the characteristics of the zone (e.g., social, economic,
and demographic conditions)
}
Description of the anticipated activity in the zone
}
Any other information the commissioner requires. |
|
11
|
Limitations.
Establishes various rules
governing biotechnology and health science industry zones:
}
Maximum size is limited to 5,000 acres.
}
A zone may be divided into noncontiguous subzones.
}
The maximum duration of a zone is 12 years. A
shorter duration can be requested by the applicant or specified by DTED in
its designation of the zone. |
|
12
|
Application for designation of zones.
Provides rules governing applications for zone
designations. Who may apply.
One or more local
governments (city or town, county, and school district) may apply for
designation of a zone. The zone must
be located, at least partially, in each of the applicant governmental
units. A local government can apply
for only one zone designation. Contents of application.
The
application must include:
}
A development plan for the zone
}
The proposed duration of the zone
}
Resolutions approving the application by all of the cities, towns, and
counties that include the zone (This
is essentially an agreement to provide either the local sales tax exemption
or the property tax exemption.)
}
Supporting evidence to help the commissioner of DTED evaluate the
merits of the application
}
An agreement by the local government to follow the business subsidy law
for tax incentives that are provided to businesses in the zones. |
|
13
|
Designation of biotechnology and health science industry
zones.
Directs the commissioner of DTED to designate no
more than one biotechnology and health science industry zone. Priority is to be given to applicants that
link a higher education or research institution to the industry facilities in
the zone. In designating the zone,
the commissioner may modify the development plan, including the boundaries of
the zone. Notice and a statement of
reasons must be provided to the applicant for any modifications. Need indicators.
The commissioner must
consider the following measures of need:
}
The extent to which land near a scientific research institution could
be better used for biotechnology industry facilities
}
The amount of deteriorating or underutilized property in or near the
potential zone
}
The extent to which property in the area would remain undeveloped due
to physical characteristics of the property
The
commissioner may require applicants to provide data demonstrating how the
area meets these criteria. Success indicators.
The commissioner may use
the following as measures of likely success of a proposed zone:
}
Showing of a viable link between the higher education/research
institution and the businesses
}
The extent to which the area has property and infrastructure to support
the development
}
Strength and viability of the development plan
}
Whether the development is creative and innovative
}
Local public and private commitment to the effort
}
Existing resources available in the zone
}
Relationship of the designation to other projects and regional
initiatives and programs
}
How regulatory burdens will be eased for biotechnology and health
science businesses in the zone
}
Job training efforts that will be linked to the designation
}
Linking of job creation and training to the higher education
institutions
}
The extent to which the plan is directed at and the designation of the
zone will result in high paying jobs Schedule.
The designations are to
be made during calendar year 2003 and will take effect beginning January 1,
2004. The bill sets out the following
schedule related to the designations:
}
DTED must specify the rules for applications by August 1, 2003.
}
The application deadline is October 15, 2003. } DTED must designate the zones by December 31, 2003. |
|
14
|
Application for tax benefits; limit on amount.
Requires businesses seeking tax incentives
listed in section 15
to apply to DTED for tax credit certificates. The business must agree to provide
information sufficient to verify its eligibility for the tax benefits. DTED must provide verification to the
Department of Revenue of the eligibility of the business. The business can only qualify for tax
incentives equal to the credit certificates given. The certificates will indicate the amount and type of tax
incentives available to the business.
The authority to award these certificates is limited to $1 million for
the current biennium. No allocation
is provided for award of tax reductions in future biennia. This limit does not apply to local taxes
(i.e., property and local sales taxes). |
|
15
|
Available tax incentives.
The
following tax incentives are available in biotechnology and health science
industry zones:
}
The property tax exemption under section 2
}
The corporate franchise tax exemption under section 16
} The state and local sales tax exemption under section 8 } The research credit under section 18 } The jobs credit under section 17 |
|
16
|
Corporate franchise tax exemption.
Provides
that a corporation operating in the zone is exempt from the corporate
franchise tax, if it is a qualified business. If the entire business operates in the zone, the corporation is
fully exempt from taxation under the corporate franchise tax and would not be
required to file a return. If the
corporation does business both within and outside of the zone, the following
rules apply:
}
Regular tax.
The corporation's
taxable net income is multiplied by its zone percentage (average property and
payroll in the zone divided by total Minnesota property and payroll) and
subtracted from its taxable income. } AMT. The corporation's alternative minimum taxable income is multiplied by the zone percentage and this amount is subtracted from alternative minimum taxable income. } Minimum fee. Its zone property and payroll are excluded from calculating the minimum fee. Limits.
The exemption under this
section cannot exceed the lesser of the (1) credit certificates that DTED
awarded to the business or (2) 20 percent of the business' zone payroll and
the basis of its property in the zone. |
|
17
|
Jobs credit. Provides a job credit to a qualified business operating in a zone equal to 7 percent of: } The lesser of either: · The increase in the business payroll in the zone since the year of designation or · The increases in total Minnesota payroll since the year of designation; minus } The increase in the number of FTEs in the zone since designation multiplied by $30,000 Inflation adjustment. Starting for tax year 2005, the $30,000 amount will adjusted for inflation. Refundable.
The credit is
refundable.
Under
section 14
, the credit cannot exceed the amount of credit
certificates that have been allocated to the qualified business. |
|
18
|
Research credit.
Allows a credit for increases
in expenditures by qualifying businesses on research. This credit essentially is the same as the
research credit generally allowed under the corporate franchise tax with
three exceptions:
}
The research must be done in the fields of biotechnology or health
sciences.
}
The research must be done in the zone.
}
The credit is refundable.
Under
section 14
, the credit cannot exceed the amount of credit
certificates that have been allocated to the qualified business. |
|
19
|
Repayment of tax benefits.
Requires a
business to repay tax benefits or any non-tax amounts provided by the local
governments, if the business:
}
Did not meet the goals specified in a business subsidy agreement. The commissioner can extend by a year the
time to meet the agreed goals.
}
Ceased to operate in the zone or was not a qualified business.
The
provision requires repayment of the last two years of benefits received
before the business ceased its zone operations. Repayment could be required after termination of the zone. Disposition or repayments.
Repayments of state tax
reductions are paid to the state and deposited in the general fund. Repayments of property taxes are
distributed to local governments in the same manner as delinquent property
taxes. Repayments of local sales
taxes are made to the unit imposing the tax. Authority to collect.
The
commissioner of revenue is given authority to collect repayments in the same
manner as unpaid taxes and the same interest and penalty rules apply. For individual income and corporate
franchise taxes, the taxpayer files an amended return and must repay within
30 days after the triggering event.
For property taxes, the county auditor is to prepare a tax statement
using the otherwise applicable tax rates.
If the amounts are not paid, they become liens against the property in
the same way as any other unpaid property tax. Waiver authority.
The commissioner of revenue,
after consulting with the commissioner of DTED and the affected local units
of government, may waive all or part of a repayment if it is deemed to be in
the best interest of the state and the business ceased operations for reasons
beyond its control, such as a natural disaster, unforeseen industry trends,
or loss of a major supplier or customer. |
|
20
|
Zone performance; remedies.
A
successful applicant for a zone designation must annually report to the
commissioner on zone performance and its compliance with the business subsidy
law. Based on these reports and other
information, the commissioner may take action the commissioner considers
appropriate, such as removing property from the zone or terminating the zone
or a subzone. Before doing so, the
commissioner must consult with the local governments and provide notice of
the proposed action. The commissioner's
action may be appealed as a contested case under the administrative
procedures act. Income and property
tax incentives provided in area removed from a zone or terminated zone
continue for existing businesses.
Sales tax exemptions continue for purchases made before the beginning
the first calendar month beginning 30 days after termination of the zone or
removal of the property. |
Article 3: Federal Update
Overview
This article updates the references to Internal Revenue Code for purposes of the income and franchise taxes, property tax refund, and general tax administration to adopt federal changes made in the Job Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 (JGTRRA). These changes were enacted since the last update to December 31, 2002, which occurred in chapter 127 of the 2003 regular session. Changes to the Internal Revenue Code in JGTRRA that affect Minnesota are: } Increase the standard deduction for married joint filers to be twice as large as for single filers, effective for tax years 2003 and 2004; } Increase the allowance for expensing of capital assets from $25,000 to $100,000, with the starting point of the phaseout increased from $200,000 to $400,000; } Increase the allowance for bonus depreciation from 30% to 50%, effective for property acquired between May 5, 2003, and January 1, 2005. Under this article Minnesota will extend current law treatment of bonus depreciation to the additional 20 percent allowed under JGTRRA. The article is effective on the commissioner of finance's certification that the Secretary of Treasury has approved Minnesota's plan for using revenue sharing payments provided under JGTRRA |
|
|
1
|
Federal update;
administrative.
Updates the administrative chapter
Internal Revenue Code reference to federal changes through June 15, 2003. |
|
2
|
Net income.
Conforms
to federal changes to the definition of net income. Changes include: } providing standard deductions for married joint filers equal to 200 percent of the standard deduction amount for single filers;
}
increasing the allowance for expensing of capital
assets from $25,000 to $100,000, with the starting point of the phaseout
increased from $200,000 to $400,000;
}
recognizing the additional 20% bonus depreciation as
a reduction in adjusted gross income for purposes of calculating eligibility
for and phaseout of various deductions and credits.
|
|
3
|
Income tax
definitions.
Updates the income tax chapter Internal
Revenue Code reference to changes made through June 15, 2003. This conforms to changes enacted since
December 31, 2002, specifically JGTRRA 2003. |
|
4
|
Federal update;
property tax refund.
Updates the property tax refund chapter
Internal Revenue Code reference to federal changes through June 15,
2003. This conforms the property tax
refund to changes in the definition of net income. |
|
5
|
Effective date.
Makes the
article effective after the commissioner of finance certifies that the
Secretary of Treasury has approved Minnesota's plan for revenue sharing
payments provided under JGTRRA 2003. |
Article 4: Property Tax es
Overview
Eliminates the two columns in the truth-in-taxation notice that show the proposed tax change due to spending factors and changes due to other factors. Sets the metropolitan council's levy amounts for its general levy, highway right of way, and livable communities levy for payable 2004 and 2005. In subsequent years, indexes those amounts by the implicit price deflator, rather than by market value growth. Exempts amateur baseball parks owned and operated by nonprofit organizations from property tax Eliminates the education reserve account in the general fund which currently will receive growth in the statewide general property tax levy.
Strikes the commissioner of public safety's authority to certify a
"back-up" levy for public safety radio costs (enacted in 2003 special
session, H.F. 1 providing for state government finance) if the local
governments do not reimburse the state for certain costs Establishes a special taxing district in St. Louis county for the Chris Jensen nursing home. |
|
|
1
|
Exemption; baseball
parks.
Exempts baseball parks from property tax if they are owned and
operated by a private, nonprofit charitable organization and are primarily
used as a baseball park by amateur baseball players. This is the same property tax exemption
provided under current law for ice arenas owned and operated by a private,
nonprofit charitable organization and used primarily for youth and high
school programs. |
|
2
|
Elderly Living Facility.
Provides
that an elderly living facility is exempt from property taxation if the facility
meets all of the following requirements:
}
located in a first class city with a population of over 350,000;
}
owned and operated by a nonprofit corporation organized under chapter 317A;
}
construction commenced after January 1, 2002, and before June 1, 2003;
}
consists of two buildings, connected to a church;
}
land for the facility donated by the church;
}
residents of the facility are at least 62 years of age or handicapped;
}
operates on-site congregate dining which residents must use; and;
}
at least 30 percent of the units are occupied by persons whose annual
income does not exceed 50 percent of the area's median family income Exempts the qualifying property
for the term of the initial permanent financing or 25 years, whichever is
later. Effective the day following
final enactment.
|
|
3
|
Valuation of income-producing property.
Repeals the
reference to class 4d property, since this class is repealed (under existing
law) for taxes payable in 2004. |
|
4
|
Class 4.
Repeals the references and class rates for
class 4d, since this class is repealed under existing law. (Beginning for taxes payable in 2004, the
class rates for 4d and the regular apartments are the same.) This also
eliminates the directive that class 4d properties must be valued using
"normal unrestricted rents." This
will allow owners of class 4d properties that are subject to rent
restrictions to seek reduced values based on the effects that the rent
restriction agreements have on the market value of the properties. |
|
5
|
State property tax levy.
Eliminates the education reserve account in
the general fund. Under present law,
growth in the statewide property tax would be deposited in this account
beginning in fiscal year 2004. Directs the commissioner of revenue to increase
or decrease the state general tax rate to account for errors and tax base
changes that affected the rate in either of the two prior years. Adjustments are limited to the extent that
necessary information is available at the time the rates must be certified. Adjustments may only be made for:
(i) an erroneous report by a local official;
(ii) an erroneous calculation by the
commissioner; or
(iii) increases or decreases in taxable value
for commercial-industrial or seasonal residential recreational property
determined by comparing the information reported on the abstracts of
assessment with the information reported on the abstracts of tax lists for
the same year.
The commissioner may, but need not, make
adjustments if the total difference in the tax levied for the year would be
less than $100,000. Effective June
30, 2003, and thereafter.
|
|
6
|
Truth in taxation
notice.
This section makes two changes
}
eliminates the two
columns currently on the TnT notice that show the tax change due to spending
factors and changes due to other factors.
Effective for notices prepared in 2003 for payable 2004, and
thereafter;
}
allows referenda
approved by voters by the first Tuesday in November increasing a taxing
district's levy limit under section 275.73 to be one of the allowable
exceptions not included in the proposed amounts shown on the TnT notice.
|
|
7
|
Southern St. Louis
county special taxing district.
Includes the southern St. Louis county
special taxing district (Chris Jensen nursing home) in the list of special
taxing districts. (See section 12
) |
|
8
|
Metropolitan council
levy; highway right of way.
Sets the levy limit for the metropolitan
council's highway right-of-way levy at $2,828,379 for taxes payable in 2004
and 2005. Thereafter, the levy limit
increases by the implicit price deflator (IPD) for government expenditures
and gross investment for state and local governments calculated by the U.S.
Department of Commerce. |
|
9
|
Metropolitan council;
general levy.
Sets the levy limit for the metropolitan
council's general purpose levy at $10,522,329 for taxes payable in 2004 and
in 2005. $1 million of this amount
must be transferred to the livable communities housing account, as under
current law. In subsequent years, the
levy limit increases by the implicit price deflator.
|
|
10
|
Metropolitan council;
livable communities levy.
Sets the levy limit for the livable
communities demonstration account levy at $8,259,070 for taxes payable in
2004 and 2005 (plus the $5 million transfer from fiscal disparities). Thereafter, the levy limit increases by
the implicit price deflator.
|
|
11
|
Statewide public safety
radio levy.
Strikes the authority in the 2003 special session State
Government Finance bill given to the commissioner of public safety to certify
a levy if the local governments do not reimburse the department for certain
public safety radio system costs.
|
|
12
|
Southern St. Louis County Special Taxing
District; Chris Jensen Nursing Home.
Establishes the Southern St. Louis County
Special Taxing District. This
district comprises the cities of Duluth, Proctor, Hermantown, Brookston,
Floodwood, and Meadowlands and a number of towns and unorganized townships in
the southern part of the county. The
district is established to operate, maintain, and improve the Chris Jensen
Nursing Home.
Levy.
The district is a political subdivision
and special taxing district under section 275.066. Its maximum annual levy is 1.90 percent of taxable tax capacity
for the first year (about $1 million) and 1.33 percent of taxable tax
capacity in subsequent years ($700,000 per year).
Board membership.
The board
has nine members. The Duluth mayor
appoints three, subject to city council approval, including at least two city
council members, who serve at the mayor's pleasure. The St. Louis county board appoints three county members from
Duluth and the district, who service at the county board's pleasure. The mayors of Hermantown and Proctor
appoint a city council member from either city to serve at the mayors'
pleasure. The town board chairs of
Rice Lake, Grand Lake, Canosia, or Lakewood townships appoint a resident of
those townships to serve a three-year term.
The town board chairs and mayors of the remaining cities and towns in
the district appoint a resident to serve a three-year term. There is a limited time to make appointments
before a resident of the district can request the chief district judge to
make the appointments. The section
also provides for determining vacancies and filling them.
Open meeting law.
All
meetings of the nursing home board are subject to the open meeting law.
Transfer of property.
All of
the assets and liabilities of the Chris Jensen Nursing Home are transferred
from St. Louis county to the district on the first day it is created, but no
later than January 1, 2005.
Effective date:
Local approval
by the St. Louis county board.
Specifies when the levy authority takes effect (based on when the
district is approved).
|
|
13
|
Repealer.
Paragraph (a) repeals an obsolete low income housing exemption which
was enacted for certain property which no longer qualifies for the
exemption. Effective for taxes
payable in 2004.
Paragraph (b) repeals the definition of "constant spending" levy
amount, which is no longer needed due to the changes in section
6
. Effective for taxes payable in 2004.
|
Article 5: City Aids
Overview
Provides for city aid reductions totaling $142 million in 2003 and $170 million in 2004(compared to 2003 certified amounts). Implements a new need-based aid formula for cities in 2004. City aid reductions in 2003 are based on a percentage of levy plus aid. City reductions are limited to 3.7 percent of spending for small cities, and 5.25 percent for larger cities. City reductions apply first to LGA and second to market value credits. The new city aid formula is implemented in 2004. The new city formula is based on a calculation of need minus ability to pay. Need for a large city is based on population decline, pre-1940 housing, road accidents per capita, whether the city is located in the metro area, and household size. Need for a small city is based on the current formula factors, with updated coefficients. Ability to pay is measured using the city's tax capacity, average tax rate, and taconite aids (phased-in over a five year period). Most of the city aid base (grandfathered aid) is eliminated. Only aid base granted since 1995 for specific purposes are retained. The cities of Red Wing and Comfrey are given additional city aid base beginning with aid payable in 2004. City aid reductions in 2004 are based on the difference between what the city gets in aid in 2003 and what it would get under the new formula. The 2004 reduction must be at least equal to a city's 2003 reduction and is limited to 14 percent of levy plus aids for cities with high per capita tax capacity, and to 13 percent of levy plus aids for cities with low per capita tax capacity.
Provides that for 2005 and later years
cities with population over 2,500 may not receive aid reductions from one
year to the next greater than 10 percent of the previous year's levy. This provides for a 10 year phase-in of
the new formula amounts for large cities that receive greatly reduced aid
amounts under the new formula. Provides that for 2004 cities with populations under 2,500 may not receive aid reductions greater than 5 percent of certified 2003 aid or the amount of the 2003 aid cut, whichever is greater. Provides that for 2005 and later years cities with populations under 2,500 may not receive aid reductions from one year to the next greater than 5 percent of the certified aid amount for 2003. This provides for a 20 year phase-in of the new formula amounts for small cities with significant aid reductions as a result of updating the coefficients in the existing small city aid formula. |
|
|
1
|
State demographer.
Directs
the state demographer to estimate the average household size for cities with
population over 2,500 by May 1 of each year. |
|
2
|
City Revenue need.
Defines
the city revenue need measure for the LGA formula. The need measure for cities with a population of 2,500 or more
is the governor's new need measure in which need per capita is equal to:
}
5.0734908 times the pre 1940 housing percentage;
plus
}
19.141678 times the population decline; plus
}
2540.06334 times the road accident factor (new);
minus
}
the metropolitan area factor (new); minus
}
49.10638 times the household size (new);
plus
}
355.0547
(includes the control variable effect).
The need measure for cities with a
population less than 2,500 uses the same factors used in current law but with
the governor's updated coefficients based on 2000 data. The need factor is adjusted for inflation
beginning with aids payable in 2005. |
|
3
|
City aid base.
Eliminates the portions of city aid base consisting of
}
grandfathered 1993
local government aid, equalization aid, and disparity reduction aid; and
}
grandfathered
amounts relating to transfers from city general funds to water and sewer
funds in 1992 or 1993.
Adds $200,000 of city aid base in
2004 only to a city with a nuclear dry cask storage facility (city of Red
Wing only) and permanently adds $10,000 of city aid base to a city in a
federal disaster area declared on April 1, 1998, which lost at least 40% of
its pre-1940 housing stock (city of Comfrey only). Also strikes obsolete language related to a special payment to
the city of Baxter for aids payable in 2000 to 2003.
|
|
4
|
Household size.
Defines
household size, which is a new factor in the large city need measure. This will be determined annually by the
state demographer. |
|
5
|
Road accidents
factor.
Defines the "road accidents factor" as the average
annual per capita number of motor vehicle accidents occurring in the city
over the most recent three-year period.
This is a new factor in the large city need measure.
|
|
6
|
Metropolitan area
factor.
This is a new factor in the large city need
measure and is equal to 35.20915 for cities in the seven-county metropolitan
area. It is a "dummy variable" that
reflects that a city outside the metro area has a higher spending "need" than
a similar city in the metropolitan area. |
|
7
|
City formula aid.
The
formula is similar to current law - need minus ability to raise revenue,
except it expands the measure of revenue raising ability over a five year
period to include taconite aids. The measure of revenue raising ability
includes 25 percent of taconite aids for aid payable in 2005, 50 percent for
aid payable in 2006, 75 percent for aid payable in 2007, and 100 percent for
aid payable in 2008 and following years. Currently "ability to pay" is
determined solely by tax capacity and average city tax rate.
|
|
8
|
City aid
distribution.
States that the city aid is equal to the
city's formula aid plus any remaining city aid base (grandfathered aid). The only remaining grandfathered aid is
special aids granted to specific cities for specific purposes. It includes the regional center aid that
was part of the 2001 reform.
Provides that no city's aid
increase in 2004 may exceed its 2003 aid amount after reductions. Provides that in 2005 and thereafter no
city's aid amount can increase in any year by more than 10% of its city levy
in the previous year.
Provides that for 2005 and
later years cities with populations over 2,500 may not receive aid reductions
from one year to the next greater than 10 percent of the previous year's
levy.
Provides that for 2004 cities
with populations under 2,500 may not receive aid reductions greater than 5
percent of certified 2003 aid or the amount of the 2003 aid cut, whichever is
greater. Provides that for 2005 and
later years cities with populations under 2,500 may not receive aid
reductions from one year to the next greater than 5 percent of the certified
aid amount for 2003.
|
|
9
|
Aid appropriations.
Strikes
obsolete language related to previous LGA and county aid appropriations. |
|
10
|
Aid appropriations;
cities.
The appropriation for city LGA in calendar year 2004 is equal
to $429 million (an additional $8 million of transition aid is distributed
under the 2004 city aid cuts). The
appropriation for city LGA in 2005 and thereafter is equal to $437.052
million. The automatic inflation
factor for aid appropriations under current law is repealed.
Provides that the state
costs currently subtracted from each city's LGA before payment are made, are
now subtracted from the LGA appropriation before it is spread.
|
|
11
|
Definitions.
Paragraph (b) d
efines the 2003 "levy plus aid revenue base" for a
city as the sum of the city's property tax levy for taxes payable in 2003,
plus the sum of the amounts the city was certified to receive in 2003 as:
}
local government aid
under section 477A.013;
}
existing low-income
housing aid under section 477A.06;
}
new construction
low-income housing aid under section 477A.065; and
}
taconite aids under
sections 298.28 and 298.282 including any aid which was required to be placed
in a special fund for expenditure in the next succeeding year.
Paragraph (c) defines total
revenues for a city as total nondebt revenues as reported by the state
auditor for the most recent year available, excluding grants between
political subdivisions but including net transfers from an enterprise fund. |
|
12
|
2003 city aid
reductions.
Provides aid reductions for cities in 2003 equal to 9.3 percent
of the city's levy plus aid revenue base for 2003. The aid reduction is limited to 3.7 percent of the city's total
revenues for 2003 if the city has a population under 1,000 or if the city has
a three-year levy plus aid revenue base increase average of less than 2
percent. For all other cities, the
reduction is limited to 5.25 percent of the city's total revenues for 2003.
The reduction is further
limited to the sum of the city's payable 2003 local government aid
distribution and the city's payable 2003 market value credits
reimbursement. The reduction is
applied first to local government aid distributions, and then, if necessary,
to market value credit reimbursements. |
|
13
|
2004 city aid
reductions.
Provides for city aid reductions in 2004. Defines an initial aid reduction amount
for each city equal to the amount that the city's local government aid
decreased from 2003 to 2004. Provides
for a minimum aid reduction equal to the city's reduction in 2003, except
that the minimum reduction is reduced by the amount of any special city aid
base increases.
Provides for a maximum aid
reduction of 14 percent of the city's levy plus aid base if the city's ANTC
per capita exceeds $700, or 13 percent of the levy plus aid base if the
city's ANTC per capita is less than $700.
Provides that if a city's
initial aid reduction is less than its minimum reduction, the difference is
taken as a reduction in its market value credits reimbursements. If a city's initial aid reduction is
greater than its maximum aid reduction, it receives an additional
distribution equal to the difference.
Provides that the city's
initial aid reduction is applied first to local government aid, and then to
the market value credits reimbursements. |
|
14
|
Repealer.
Repeals } Local government aid base reduction percentage (§ 477A.011, subd. 37)
}
Inflation adjustment for various aid appropriations including city
local government aid (§ 477A.03, subd. 3)
}
Additional appropriation for city local government aid of $450,000 for
1999 through 2008 (§ 477A.03, subd. 4)
}
Low-income housing aid. (§ 477A.06)
}
Rental housing tax base replacement aid (§ 477A.07)
}
Outdated aid reductions that occurred in 1996 and 1997 (§ 477A.0132)
|
Article 6: Other Intergovernmental Aids
Overview
Provides for county, town, and special district aid reductions totaling $69 million in 2003 and $122 million in 2004. Implements a new need-based aid formula for counties in 2005. County aid reductions in 2003 are based on a percentage of levy plus aid. County reductions are limited to 3.21 percent of levy plus aid. County aid reductions apply to HACA, attached machinery aid, criminal justice aid, and family preservation aid. County aid reductions in 2004 equal 5.689 percent of 2004 levy plus aids. The new county formula aid formula is implemented in 2005, and consists of two parts: need-based aid and equalization aid. Need-based aid is determined 40 percent by the relative proportion of a county's age-adjusted population, 40 percent by the relative proportion of a county's population receiving food stamps, and 20 percent by the relative proportion of part I crimes per capita in the county. Equalization aid is intended to compensate counties with low relative tax base. Transition aid is provided for counties with large changes in aid relative to current law. Town aid reductions in 2003 equal two percent of certified levy in 2003. Aid reductions in 2004 equal three percent of 2003 certified levy. In both years the aid reduction is limited to the town's market value credit reimbursements. Special district aid reductions in 2003 equal 1.5 percent of certified levy in 2003. Aid reductions in 2004 equal two percent of 2003 certified levy. In both years the aid reduction is limited to the district's market value credit reimbursements. |
|
|
1
|
Temporary aid for
court costs.
Locks in the estimate of the costs to be assumed
by the state as part of the court takeover.
This estimate is used to calculate aid and levy offsets during the
transition period for the takeover in each judicial district. The HACA converted to the new county
program aid is reduced by the total estimated costs. Each county receives a temporary aid
payment until the courts in that county have been taken over by the state. |
|
2
|
Temporary aid; court
administration costs.
Provides for temporary aid, equal to the
increase in court administration costs after 2003, to continue as an
independent temporary aid program after HACA is converted to county program
aid. The aid is reduced by 50 percent
in the year the state assumes control of court administration costs. Under current law, temporary aid for court
administration costs is included as "additional" HACA. Effective for aid payable in 2004 and
2005. |
|
3
|
County HACA.
Eliminates HACA payments for counties beginning in calendar year 2004
but provides for payments for the transition year aid and temporary court
aids in the two previous sections.
Effective for aid payable in 2004 and thereafter. |
|
4
|
HACA appropriation.
Deletes
obsolete language providing appropriations to pay for local impact notes from
HACA funding. These appropriations
are directed to the new county aid program in section 5
. |
|
5
|
County program aid.
Subd.
1. Calendar year 2004.
Defines "county program aid" for aids
payable in 2004 to be equal to the amount each county was originally
certified to receive in 2003 from attached machinery aid, homestead and
agricultural aid (HACA), manufactured home HACA, criminal justice aid and
family preservation aid. The HACA
set-aside for future court takeovers is excluded from county program aid.
Subd. 2. Definitions.
Defines
terms for county program aid for aids payable in 2005 and thereafter. County program aid consists of two major
components, county need aid and county tax-base equalization aid.
Subd.
3. County need aid.
County need aid has three subcomponents;
for each subcomponent each county receives an allocation equal to its share
of the state total for the relevant factor.
Forty percent is allocated based on population (with extra weighting
for the percentage of the population over age 65), forty percent based on
households receiving food stamps, and twenty percent based on part I crimes.
Subd. 4.
County tax-base equalization aid.
The total appropriation for county tax
base equalization aid is allocated based on each county's tax-base
equalization factor relative to the sum of factors for all counties in the
state. The tax-base equalization
factor is defined as $185 times the county's population minus 9.45% of the
county's net tax capacity. For
counties with a population less than 10,000, the factor is multiplied by a
factor of 3. For counties with a
population from 10,000- to 12,500, the factor is multiplied by a factor of
2. For counties with a population
greater than 500,000, the factor is multiplied by a factor of 0.25.
Subd. 5.
County transition aid.
Provides transition aid to counties with
an aid loss under the new formula that is greater than three percent of tax
capacity relative to a pro-rated aid amount based on current law. Transition aid is phased out over three
years. |
|
6
|
Aid appropriations;
counties.
The appropriations for the new county program aids are $100.5
million beginning in 2005 for the county need aid and $105 million beginning
in 2005 for the county tax-base equalization aid. The automatic inflation factor for aid appropriations under
current law is repealed.
Provides for $500,000 of the
total county appropriation to fund public defender programs currently funded
under county criminal justice aid (CCJA).
Also provides for up to $214,000 of the total county appropriation to
fund local fiscal impact notes prepared by the commissioners of finance and
of children, families, and learning, currently funded through HACA.
|
|
7
|
Public defense
services; correctional facility inmates.
Allows funding for these
public defender programs to come from the portion of the new county program
aid that is a substitute for the current county criminal justice aid
(CCJA). Public defender programs are
currently funded from CCJA.
|
|
8
|
Cost of transcripts.
Allows
funding for certain costs of transcripts needed for public defender cases to
come from the portion of the new county program aid that is a substitute for
the current county criminal justice aid (CCJA).
|
|
9
|
Definitions.
Paragraph (b) defines the 2003 and 2004 "levy plus
aid revenue base" for a county as the sum of the county's property tax levy
for taxes payable in 2003, plus the sum of the amounts the county was
certified to receive in the designated year as:
}
homestead and
agricultural credit aid (HACA), excluding any amounts set-aside for future
court takeovers plus any aid to correct for errors in the HACA effort amounts
for 2001 mandated court services takeover;
}
manufactured home
HACA;
}
criminal justice aid
under section 477A.0121;
}
family preservation
aid under section 477A.0122;
}
taconite aids under
sections 298.28 and 298.282 including any aid which was required to be placed
in a special fund for expenditure in the next succeeding year; and,
}
county program aid
under section 477A.0124. |
|
10
|
2003 county aid
reductions.
Provides aid reductions for counties in 2003 equal to 3.21
percent of the county's levy plus aid revenue base for 2003. The reduction is limited to the sum of the
county's payable 2003 distributions for attached machinery aid, HACA,
criminal justice aid, family preservation aid, and market value credit
reimbursements. These aids are
reduced as necessary in the order listed. |
|
11
|
2003 township aid
reductions.
Provides aid reductions for townships in 2003 equal to two
percent of the town's certified levy for taxes payable in 2003, limited to
the amount of the town's payable 2003 market value credit reimbursements. |
|
12
|
2003 special taxing
district aid reductions.
Provides aid reductions for special taxing
districts in 2003 equal to 1.5 percent of the district's certified levy for
taxes payable in 2003, limited to the amount of the district's payable 2003
market value credit reimbursements. |
|
13
|
2004 county aid
reductions.
Provides for county aid reductions in 2004 equal to 5.689
percent of the county's levy plus aid revenue base for 2004. The reduction is limited to the sum of the
payable 2004 county program aid amount and the county's market value credit
reimbursements. The aid reduction is
applied first to the county's program aid amount, and then if necessary to
the county's market value credit reimbursements. |
|
14
|
2004 township aid
reductions.
Provides for aid reductions for townships in 2004 equal to
three percent of the town's certified levy for taxes payable in 2003, limited
to the amount of the town's 2004 market value credit reimbursements. |
|
15
|
2004 special taxing
district aid reductions.
Provides for aid reductions for special
taxing districts in 2004 equal to two percent of the district's certified
levy for taxes payable in 2003, limited to the amount of the district's 2004
market value credit reimbursements. |
|
16
|
HACA adjustment;
court takeover.
Provides for a corrective aid increase for
counties whose 2002 aid reduction was mistakenly calculated based on court
costs not assumed by the state. |
|
17
|
Repealer.
Repeals
}
County and school
district attached machinery aid (§ 273.138)
}
County HACA (§ 273.1398, subds. 2, 2c, and 4d) } Manufactured home county HACA (§ 273.166) } County criminal justice aid (§ 477A.0121)
}
County family preservation aid (§ 477A.0122)
}
County out-of-home placement aid (enacted in 2001 and scheduled for
implementation for aid payable in 2004 under current law) (§ 477A.0123)
}
Inflation adjustment for various aid appropriations including county
criminal justice aid and county family preservation aid (§ 477A.03, subd. 3)
}
Outdated aid reductions that occurred in 1996 and 1997 (§ 477A.0132)
}
Rental housing tax base replacement aid (§ 477A.07)
|
Article 7: Levy Limits
Overview
Imposes levy limits on cities with populations over 2,500 and counties for taxes levied in 2003 payable in 2004. The starting point for calculating levy limits in Pay 2004 is the local government's Payable 2003 levy limit, less any unused levy authority, plus 2003 certified aids, before reductions. The adjustments for household growth, commercial/industrial growth, and inflation are eliminated. Cities and counties are allowed to levy back 60% of their 2004 aid and market value credit cuts. The size of the 2004 cut is measured from the 2003 certified amount before reductions. Special levy authority is not reduced from current levels. For example, a city with a $10,000 aid reduction in 2003 and an additional $5,000 reduction in 2004 would have a total reduction over the two year period of $25,000 ($10,000 in 2003, and $15,000 in 2004). This city would be allowed to levy back $9,000 (60 percent of the $15,000 reduction that occurs in 2004). In a related change, the property tax article allows local governments to seek an increase in their levy limit authority via referendum up until the first Tuesday in November and have it be effective for that levy year. These referendum adjustments are in addition to authorized truth-in-taxation levies. |
|
|
1
|
Special levies.
Eliminates an obsolete special levy for
redistricting costs. Adjusts the
special levy for state assumption of court costs to reflect changes in how
the aids related to the takeover are calculated. Allows a county to use the jail operating special levy for a
new regional jail without adjusting its levy limit base for existing jail
operating costs, provided that the new jail is an addition to rather than a
substitution for existing facilities. |
|
2
|
Levy limit base.
Defines
the Pay 2004 levy limit base as the 2003 adjusted levy limit base plus
attached machinery aid and mobile home HACA, and less (1) any "unused" levy
authority in Pay 2003, and (2) any property tax replacement aid (for greater
Minnesota transit programs) received in 2003. |
|
3
|
Adjusted levy limit
base.
Eliminates the growth factors for inflation, number of households,
and growth in new commercial/industrial property.
The base is decreased by 40
percent of the difference between 2003 certified aids, before reductions and
2004 certified aids after reductions.
This allows "levy back" of 60 percent of 2003 aid losses.
The base is also increased
by 60% of the difference between 2003 market value credits before reductions
and 2004 market value credits after reductions. This is necessary to allow "levy back " of market value credit
losses since market value credits are a deduction from the certified levy
amount. |
|
4
|
Property tax levy
limit.
Removes the charter exception language that was passed
separately in Laws 2003, chapter 127.
Corrects some cross references. Eliminates the offset for aids that
are repealed in article 6. Reduces
the levy limit by the amount of wind production tax payment received in lieu
of property tax formerly paid by these properties. |
|
5
|
Levies in excess of
levy limits.
Deletes an obsolete provision related to over-levy
of jail special levies in Pay 2003. |
|
6
|
Adjustments for
changes in service levels.
Provides for levy limit adjustments when
there are different tax rates and service levels due to an annexation. Currently this is only allowed for
agreements entered into prior to January 1, 1999. |
|
7
|
Levy effective date.
Allows a
referendum held to exceed levy limits to be effective in the current levy
year provided that the referendum is held before or at the general election
in November. |
|
8
|
Information necessary
to calculate the levy limit base.
Requires a small city subject to levy limits for
the first time, to provide the commissioner of revenue with the information
needed to calculate its levy limit base.
Failure to provide the information will result in its total Pay 2004
levy authority, including special levies, being limited to its 2003 levy
amount. |
Article 8: Sales and Use Tax
Overview
This article makes a number of changes in the sales tax. It: Repeals the sales tax exemption for the state fair. Eliminates the scheduled repeal of the June accelerated payment and increases the percentage from 75 to 85 percent. Exempts the metropolitan public safety radio system equipment from taxation. Exempts education, religious, and rehabilitation camp fees for adults. Provides a construction materials exemption for the Walker Arts Center. Extends the time allowed for the exemptions for biomass and hydroelectric generation projects. Authorizes Duluth to use the proceeds of its local food and beverage tax and lodging tax for debt service on the bonds for the Great Lakes Aquarium. Authorizes Itasca County to impose a local lodging tax. |
|
|
1
|
Sales to other
dealers.
Removes the requirement that limited use vehicle dealers may
sell vehicles to customers only by way of vehicle auctioneers, and allows
them to sell to other motor vehicle dealers.
Requires nonprofit charitable organizations with a limited use vehicle
license that accept donations of vehicles to provide a receipt to a donor
within 90 days. The receipt must
include information on the age and condition of the vehicle. This provision allows nonprofit charitable
organizations to accept donations of vehicles and to then donate the vehicles
to other individuals in keeping with the organization's charitable purpose. |
|
2
|
Sales and use tax;
time for payment.
Removes
the sunset for the June accelerated sales tax payment, and increases the
amount required to be paid on an accelerated basis from 75 to 85 percent of
estimated June liability. Under
current law, the June accelerated sales tax payments were scheduled to sunset
for liabilities due after fiscal year 2003.
Also states that the tax for
sellers who voluntarily register in Minnesota under the Streamlined Agreement
must be remitted by the 20th of the month following the end of the
reporting period. |
|
3
|
State Fair ticket
sales.
Suspends language allowing the state agricultural society to
retain the sales tax proceeds collected on sales of tickets to the premises
or events sponsored by the society on events conducted on the fairgrounds
during the state fair, provided that proceeds were matched by the society and
used for capital improvements to the state fairgrounds. These sales tax
proceeds will be remitted to the state and used for general fund
purposes.
|
|
4
|
June accelerated
underpayment penalty; safe harbor.
Provides
that the penalty for underpayment of the June accelerated sales tax would not
be imposed if 85 percent of the preceding May's liability or 85 percent of
the average monthly liability for the previous calendar year is
remitted. Effective for payments made
after December 31, 2003.
|
|
5
|
Public safety radio systems.
Extends
by two years the period in which the sales tax exemption applies to public
safety radio system purchases to August 1, 2005. This exemption applies to purchases in connection with
constructing, operating, maintaining, and improving the backbone system of a
region-wide public safety radio system.
To qualify for this exemption, the system must consist of a shared
infrastructure network, which is identified in a region-wide plan.
Effective date:
Day
following final enactment |
|
6
|
Nonprofit ticket sales.
Clarifies
that a nonprofit organization only qualifies for the exemption for tickets
and admissions to arts events if the organization's primary mission is to
provide an opportunity for citizens to participate in the arts. This requirement is in addition to the current
law requirements that the following conditions are met:
}
The ticket sales are
recorded on the nonprofit organization's books;
}
At least a
percentage of the organization's annual revenue is from charitable
contributions (four percent in 2003, and five percent in 2004 and following
years)
}
All revenues from
the event, less expenses, must be used to fund other arts events. |
|
7
|
Nonprofit ticket sales.
Clarifies
that a nonprofit organization only qualifies for the exemption for admission
charges if the following conditions are met:
}
the gross receipts
from the event are recorded on the nonprofit organization's books; and
}
the nonprofit
organizations bears the risk of the event and the benefit to the nonprofit
group exceeds the state and local sales tax revenues foregone by the
exemption. |
|
8
|
Sales tax exemption, camp fees.
Expands
the sales tax exemption for camps to eliminate the age restrictions on
campers. Under present law, camp fees
are exempt from the sales tax, if the camp:
}
Is owned and
operated by a charitable, 501(c)(3) organization.
}
Provides educational
and social activities primarily for people age 18 and under.
This section modifies the exemption so that it
applies to camp fees for (1) services primarily for children, adults
accompanying children or people with disabilities and (2) educational or
religious activities.
Effective date:
Sales
after June 30, 2003 |
|
9
|
Sales tax exemption,
Walker Art Center.
Provides
an exemption from sales
tax for materials, equipment, and supplies used or consumed in construction
of the Walker Art Center if more that $70,000,000 is raised from private
sources to help pay for the project.
|
|
10
|
Sales tax exemption.
Expands
the motor vehicle sales tax exemption for gifts between individuals, to
include donation of a vehicle to an individual by a limited used vehicle dealer. |
|
11
|
Duluth.
Authorizes the city of Duluth
to use the proceeds from the food and beverage tax for debt service on bonds
for the Great Lakes Aquarium. Locks
in the definition of food subject to the local food and beverage tax based on
the law as it applied before the modifications for the Streamlined Sales Tax.
|
|
12
|
Duluth.
Authorizes Duluth to expand
the use of the proceeds from its lodging tax to include debt service on bonds
issued to improve the Great Lakes Aquarium.
|
|
13
|
St. Paul.
Requires that 10 percent of
the amount of St. Paul's local sales tax revenues that is not spent on the
Civic Center Complex must be spent on the capital and operating costs of
city's cultural organizations. Under
current law, up to 60 percent of the total sales tax revenues may go to other
projects if the remainder is sufficient to pay debt service for the St. Paul
Civic Center Complex. Of the portion
not going to the Civic Center Complex, the law allows up to 10 percent to
fund operating costs of cultural organizations. This would change the permissive language to a requirement, and
allow use of local sales tax revenues for capital costs.
|
|
14
|
Sales tax exemption;
biomass electrical generation facility.
Extends the exemption from
sales tax from July 1, 2003, to July 1, 2005, for purchases of materials,
supplies, and equipment used, consumed, or incorporated into construction of
a biomass electrical generating facility.
|
|
15
|
Repealer; sunset of
June accelerated.
Strikes the repeal of the June accelerated
sales tax payment, which is retained under this article. |
|
16
|
Sales tax exemption; hydropower facility.
Advances
the termination date for the sales tax exemption applicable to construction
materials for a hydroelectric generating facility (Crown Hydro) from December
31, 2003, to December 31, 2004. |
|
17
|
State convention center.
Restates
the sales tax exemption for the Duluth convention center. This exemption was enacted in 1995,
extended in 1998, and repealed in 2001.
The restated exemption differs from the original exemption primarily
in two respects:
}
The restated
exemption extends to "equipment" and to "equipping" the facility, while the
original exemption was limited to building materials and supplies for
constructing improvements. This will
expand the exemption to various items of personal property for the facility
that did not become improvements to real property.
}
The restated
exemption includes contractor purchases, while the original exemption was
limited to purchases by the governmental unit.
Background information
: The
restatements make the Duluth Convention Center exemption consistent with the
exemptions provided for Minneapolis Convention Center and the River Centre
Arena.
Legislative intent.
States
that this section is intended to clarify the original intent of sales tax exemption. |
|
18
|
Lodging tax; Itasca
county.
Authorizes Itasca County to impose the lodging tax that is authorized
for towns and cities under Minnesota Statutes, section 469.190. The county lodging tax would supersede any
existing lodging tax imposed within the county and prohibit any town from
imposing a tax in the future. A
referendum is not required prior to imposition of a county tax, but it is
subject to reverse referendum.
|
|
19
|
Study of local sales
taxes.
Directs the commissioner of revenue to prepare a study of local
sales taxes. The study must report
on:
}
authorized uses of
local sales taxes;
}
local approval
requirements;
}
duration and
adequacy of duration for funding authorized projects;
}
if authorized uses
are regional in nature;
}
portion of revenue
raised from residents of the jurisdiction, other Minnesota residents, and
non-Minnesota residents;
}
fiscal capacity of
jurisdictions with local sales taxes;
}
sources of funding
for similar projects in jurisdictions without local sales taxes; and
}
compatibility of local
sales taxes with the Streamlined Sales Tax Project.
The commissioner must make
recommendations on
}
the appropriate role
of local sales taxes in the state and local revenue system;
}
if local sales taxes
should be limited to jurisdictions with below average fiscal capacity;
}
criteria to be used
in evaluating local sales tax proposals; and
}
the feasibility of
authorizing the commissioner of revenue to approve or deny applications from
local jurisdictions seeking to impose a local sales tax.
The study is due by February 1,
2004. |
|
20
|
Repealer.
Repeals
}
Minn. Stat. § 37.13, subd. 2 which required that the state fair board
use matching funds and the retained sales taxes to make capital improvements
to the fairgrounds. Effective for
sales occurring after June 30, 2003
}
Minn. Stat. §
325E.112, subd. 2a, which requires the commissioner of revenue to pay $250
per year to as many as 200 operators of facilities that accept used motor oil
and oil filters from the public.
|
Article 9: Special Taxes
Overview
This article: Provides tribal casino aid to Goodhue county Accelerates the payment of June liability for cigarette, tobacco, alcoholic beverage, mortgage registry, and deed taxes Dedicates 6.5 cents per pack of cigarette revenues to the academic health center special revenue fund Dedicates 2.5 cents per pack of cigarette revenues to the medical education and research costs account in the special revenue fund Provides a special tax rate for low-alcohol dairy cocktails |
|
|
1
|
Distribution of funds.
Directs the commissioner of health to annually
distribute medical education funds in the amount received under the transfer
in section 2
to the health professional programs at the academic
health center. |
|
2
|
Transfers.
Transfers $4.85 million from
the academic health center fund to the commissioner of health. This amount is redirected to the academic
health center fund in section 1
after qualifying for federal matching funds.
|
|
3
|
County tribal casino aid.
Provides
for payment of state aid to a county with a tribal casino, if the tribal
government has not entered into a tribal tax agreement with the state. The aid equals 5 percent of the
commissioner of revenue's estimate of the excise taxes (tobacco, alcoholic
beverage, and motor fuels) collected from activities on the reservation. This will provide aid to Goodhue County.
Effective date:
Taxes
collected after June 30, 2003 Background information.
Present
state law provides for aid payments to all of the counties with reservations
and casinos, except Goodhue County.
(Goodhue county does not qualify, because the Prairie Island band of
the Dakota does not have a tribal tax agreement, a pre-condition to the
county receiving aid.) Minnesota's
tribal tax agreements provide that all state taxes are collected and, then,
the state pays a share of the taxes back to the tribal government under a
formula. These formulas follow the
same general pattern for all of the tribes and have two components. The state pays the tribe:
(1) A per
capita amount that is an estimate of the state taxes paid by tribal members; and
(2) One-half
of the taxes collected that are paid by non-tribal members.
Under the tribal casino aid program, the state pays to the county in
which the casino is located ten percent of the state's share of taxes
collected under the tribal tax agreement.
Because the tribal government receives one-half of the taxes collected
(under item (2) above), the county, in effect, gets 5 percent of these shared
taxes.
This section would pay
equivalent aid to Goodhue County.
Because there is no tax agreement, tribal businesses (e.g., the
casinos, the hotel, marinas, and so forth) do not collect the state sales
tax. However, the state excise taxes
apparently are being paid on the reservation. These taxes include the cigarette tax, the alcoholic beverage
taxes (non-sales taxes), and motor fuels taxes. These taxes are collected from wholesalers (who are neither
tribal businesses nor located on the reservation) and, in effect, are passed
along as higher prices to customers of the reservation businesses.
|
|
4
|
June accelerated mortgage registry tax.
Requires counties to remit the
state's portion of the mortgage registry tax collected by June 25th
and the estimated amounts to be collected during the remainder of the month
to the commissioner of revenue two business days before June 30th.
|
|
5
|
June accelerated deed registry tax.
Requires counties to remit the
state's portion of the deed tax collected by June 25th and the
estimated amounts to be collected during the remainder of the month to the
commissioner of revenue two business days before June 30th.
|
|
6
|
Penalty for underpayment of June accelerated mortgage registry and deed taxes. Provides for a 10 percent penalty on counties for failing to timely remit their June mortgage registry or deed taxes. The penalty will not be imposed if the amount remitted in June equals either: } 90 percent of the state's portion of the preceding May's receipts; or } 90 percent of the average monthly amount of the state's portion for the previous calendar year. Effective January 1, 2004.
|
|
7
|
June accelerated cigarette tax.
Requires a distributor to pay a June
accelerated cigarette tax payment of 85 percent of the estimated June
liability when they file their May return.
Effective January 1, 2004.
|
|
8
|
Tobacco taxes; June accelerated payment and
repeal of discount.
Makes two changes:
}
Requires a distributor to pay a June
accelerated tobacco tax payment of 85 percent of the estimated June liability
when they file their May return. Effective
January 1, 2004;
}
Repeals the discount
for payors of the tobacco products tax.
This discount equals 1.5 percent of the tax (Note: repeal of the
discount was also included in Laws 2003, chapter 127) |
|
9
|
June accelerated cigarette and tobacco taxes penalty. Provides a penalty for underpayment of the June accelerated cigarette or tobacco products tax. The penalty would not be imposed if the amount received in June equals the lesser of: } 85 percent of the actual June liability; or } 85 percent of the preceding May's liability. Effective for taxpayers having a
liability of $120,000 or more during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2003,
and each fiscal year thereafter, and for accelerated payments becoming due in
the year 2004 and thereafter.
|
|
10
|
Cigarette tax; Minnesota Future Resources Fund. Repeals the provision that requires a portion of cigarette tax revenue to be credited to the Minnesota future resources fund and obsolete language dedicating cigarette tax revenue to bonds that the have been fully paid. Creates the academic health center special revenue fund for funding at the University of Minnesota and credits 6.5 cents of the tax per pack of 20 cigarettes to that fund. $4.85 million of this amount is annually transferred to the commissioner of health under section 2 in order to qualify for federal matching funds, and then returned to the academic health center fund in the distribution under section 1 . Creates the medical education and research costs account
in the special revenue fund for funding at the department of health and
credits 2.5 cents of the tax per pack of 20 cigarettes to that fund. Effective for all revenues received after
June 30, 2003.
|
|
11
|
Definition,
low-alcohol dairy cocktails.
Defines low-alcohol dairy
cocktails as beverages or products that primarily consist of milk
products and contain distilled spirits.
The amount of alcohol may not exceed 3.2 percent by volume. This definition is intended to cover ice
cream containing liquor. It would
also include pre-mixed cocktails using milk or milk products as the mix. |
|
12
|
Tax rate;
low-alcohol dairy cocktails.
Provides that a rate of
2 cents per liter applies to low-alcohol dairy cocktails. This has the effect of taxing these
products at about the rate that applies to 3.2 beer. Under present law, the full rate that
applies to distilled spirits would apply to these products (i.e., $1.33 per
liter). Effective date:
Sales made after June 30, 2003. |
|
13
|
June accelerated
liquor tax.
Requires a liquor tax distributor to pay a
June accelerated liquor tax of 85 percent of the estimated June liability
when they file their May return.
Provides a penalty for underpayment.
The penalty would not be imposed if the amount received in June equals
the lesser of:
}
85 percent of the actual June liability; or
}
85 percent of the preceding May's liability.
Effective for taxpayers
having a liability of $120,000 or more during the fiscal year ending June 30,
2003, and each fiscal year thereafter, and for accelerated payments becoming
due in the year 2004 and thereafter. |
|
14
|
Agreement to pay
taxes.
Provides that an organization which is recognized by federal
law as a quasi-government organization that would otherwise be exempt from
taxes under chapter 297E must agree to pay all taxes under chapter 297E on
lawful gambling conducted by the organization as a condition of receiving or
renewing a license or premises permit.
|
Article 10: Local Economic Development
Overview
This article allocates an additional $1.5 million for border city enterprise and border city development zones. It also makes a variety of minor changes in the tax increment financing (TIF) law. It allows authorities to extend the duration of pre-2001 districts to offset deficits caused by the 2001 property tax changes. It provides special rules for establishing redevelopment districts in declared disaster areas. The article also provides the city of New Hope with special TIF authority in a redevelopment area. |
|
|
1
|
Border city allocations. Allocates $1.5 million for border city enterprise zone and border city development zone tax reductions. This allocation is divided equally between the two programs ($750,000 to each), but the city can reallocate the amounts between the two programs. The allocation is divided among the qualifying border cities on a per capita basis. The five cities that qualify are Moorhead, Dilworth, East Grand Forks, Breckenridge, and Ortonville. |
|
2
|
Definition of
municipality.
Clarifies that a county is the
municipality when it acts under a special law. |
|
3
|
Redevelopment district.
Adds
qualifying disaster areas to the areas that qualify for designation as
redevelopment TIF districts.
Effective date:
Requests
for certification after the day following final enactment |
|
4
|
Qualified disaster area.
Defines a
qualified disaster areas as an area meeting the following three tests:
}
70 percent of area
consisted of parcels occupied by buildings, streets, utilities and other
similar structures before the disaster or emergency.
}
The area of the district
was the subject of a disaster or emergency declaration, under federal or
state law, 18 months or less before the request for certification of the
district.
}
50 percent or more
of buildings suffered substantial damage as a result of the disaster or emergency.
Effective date:
Requests
for certification after the day following final enactment |
|
5
|
Pooling for housing. Clarifies that the additional pooling authority for housing can be done by non-housing districts and that doing so does not violate the district-specific limitations on use of increments (e.g., that 95 percent of increments from redevelopment districts must be used for blight correction, that increments from economic development districts may only be used to assist certain types of businesses, and so forth).
Effective date:
Retroactive to the original effective date for the pooling rules
|
|
6
|
Use for decertification. Clarifies that required use of increment revenues, under the pooling rules, for defeasing of bonds and pre-paying contracts is calculated and applies on an annual basis. Effective date: All districts subject to the pooling rules (post-1990 districts) |
|
7
|
Original net tax capacity.
Sets the
original net capacity at the land value for a redevelopment district
qualifying under the disaster area rules.
Effective date:
Requests
for certification after the day following final enactment |
|
8
|
Duration extensions to offset deficits.
Authorizes a development authority to extend the duration of a
pre-2001 TIF district to offset deficits caused by 2001 property tax
changes. Before an authority may use
this authority, it must first exercise all of the other available deficit
reduction powers:
}
Uncapping the
original tax rate;
}
Changing fiscal
disparities options, if applicable; and
}
Transferring surplus
increments from other districts in the municipality.
Formula extensions.
The
maximum duration extension is determined under a formula.
This
formula compares the tax paid by the district's original net tax capacity in
2001 with the average tax paid in 2002 and 2003. The percentage reduction is multiplied by the remaining
duration of the district to determine the permitted extension (rounded up to
the nearest whole number of years for fractional amounts greater than
1/3). For example, a district with 9
years remaining that experienced a 25 percent drop in taxes on its original
net tax capacity would qualify for a 2-year extension (9 years * 25% = 2.25
years or rounded to 2 years). The
maximum extension under this authority is limited to four years. Additional DOR
extensions.
In addition, the commissioner of revenue
may grant extensions of up to 2 more years upon a showing that the formula
based extension would not be sufficient to offset the deficit and that it is
unlikely that the district can "grow out of" the deficit. Application could not be made until the
authority is within 3 years of the end of the duration limit (both the
regular limit and the extension under the formula). Procedures.
The authority must provide public notice
and hold a hearing before approving an extension. Qualifying
obligations.
These obligations are preexisting
obligations that are also bonds or interfund loans (an advance or loan made
by the authority or city). The city
may elect to include developer or "pay-as-you-go" obligations as qualified
obligations. However, if it does so,
the maximum formula extension is one-half of the regular length and it cannot
apply to the commissioner of revenue for an additional extension. Limits on use of
increments.
The authority may use increments from a
district that receives an extension only to pay preexisting obligations of
the district (i.e., generally obligations issued before August 1, 2001). During the extension period, increments
may only be used to pay qualifying obligations (i.e., bonds and interfund
loans). If increments from multiple
districts are pledged to pay the qualifying obligations, then all of these
districts (even if their terms have not been extended) are subject to this limit
on the use of increments.
Effective date:
Day
following final enactment for all pre-2001 districts.
|
|
9
|
Bond allocation; housing pool.
Makes a
technical correction to language enacted in Laws 2003, chapter 127,
clarifying that an entitlement issuer may apply to the housing pool if it has
either issued or returned all of its bonding authority from prior years.
|
|
10
|
New Hope TIF.
Authorizes the city of New
Hope or its Economic Development Authority to create one or more
redevelopment or soils condition TIF districts within a specifically described
area of the city. The district may
not exceed an area of 130 acres and may not include more than 131
parcels. These districts are subject
to variations from the rules that apply under general law:
►
Five year rule.
T
he
rule that limits spending within TIF districts to actions that occur within
five years after certification of the district is extended to a period of
nine years.
►
Pooling rules.
Special
pooling rules are provided for TIF districts that are established in this
area. Under general law, 25 percent
of increments from a redevelopment district may be spent on activities
located outside of the area of the district and administrative expenses count
against this limit. For districts in
this area, administrative expenses are treated as in-district expenses and
the pooling percentage is increased by 15 percentage points (i.e., to 40
percent). Since administrative
expenses typically are between 5 and 10 percent of increment revenues, this
increases the amount available for pooling to between 45 and 50 percent of
increments.
►
Duration
limit.
The duration limit for districts created
under the special law is 20 years.
Under general law, the duration limit is 25 years after the receipt of
the first increment.
►
Blight test.
Thirteen
specifically identified parcels are deemed to be substandard for the
purpose of qualifying the district as a redevelopment district.
The authority to establish tax increment financing
districts subject to these provisions expires on December 31, 2013. The bill is subject to approval by the
governing bodies of the city of New Hope and Hennepin county.
|
|
11
|
Effective date; Correction.
Provides
that the public finance article (article 12) of Chapter 127 is effective the
day following final enactment. This
effective date was inadvertently dropped in preparing the amendment to the
S.F. 1505. |
Article 11: Miscellaneous
Overview
This article: Funds the budget reserve at $596 million. Requires tax preparers who offer refund anticipation loans (RALs) to make disclosures to clients and to follow prescribed standards of conduct. Allows counties to act as claimant agencies and submit revenue recapture claims on behalf of licensed ambulance services operating within the county's boundaries. Decreases the floor on the charitable contribution deduction allowed under the alternative minimum tax from 1.3 to 1.0 percent of adjusted gross income.
Permits a
city to collect on the property tax statement costs incurred related to
municipal housing code violations. Appropriates $100,000 per year (fiscal years 2004 and 2005) for grants to organizations providing taxpayer assistance services. |
|
|
1
|
Local impact notes;
jurisdictions.
Adds "school district" to the list of political subdivisions
covered by the local impact note law.
Under current law, local impact notes may only be requested for
legislation affecting counties and cities.
|
|
2
|
Cash flow account.
Strikes
language requiring the commissioner of finance to transfer unencumbered
balances in the general fund to the cash flow account until the balance of
the account reaches $350 million. |
|
3
|
Budget reserve
account.
Directs the commissioner of finance to transfer $300 million
from the general fund to the budget reserve on July 1, 2003, and an
additional $296 million on July 1, 2004. |
|
4
|
Additional revenues;
priority.
Establishes priorities for unrestricted general fund balances
at the close of a biennium:
}
first, to the cash
flow account, until its balance reaches $350 million;
}
second, to the
budget reserve account, until its balance reaches $653 million. |
|
5
|
Notification; mosquito control district.
Modifies requirements adopted in Laws
2003, chapter 127 to clarify that notification via a web site is only
required if a web site exists.
|
|
6
|
Tax preparation services.
Applies
to tax preparers who also offer or provide refund anticipation loans (or
RALs). The section does not apply to
individuals who provide services to 5 or fewer clients, the provision of tax
preparation services to family members, and an employee's providing of
services to an employer.
Standards of conduct for tax preparers
. These
standards prohibit:
}
Delaying
unreasonably to complete a client's return
}
Obtaining a client's
signature on a blank return
}
Not signing a
client's return when you have been paid
}
Not giving the
client a copy of documents signed by the client
}
Not retaining a copy
of returns for at least four years
}
Failing to
maintaining a confidential relationship with the clients
}
Not taking
commercially reasonable steps to safeguard client's nonpublic information
}
Making false, deceptive
or misleading statements
}
Requiring a client
to enter a loan arrangement in order to complete a return
}
Claiming credits or
deductions for which the preparer knows or reasonably should know the client
is not eligible
}
Charging fees that
are a percentage of the client's tax refund
}
Failing to return to
a client a document the client provided to prepare the return.
Disclosures for RALs.
Requires
a tax preparer who offers a RAL to provide a written disclosure that states:
}
That the RAL is a
loan
}
The dollar cost of
the fees and interest for the loan.
}
The estimated annual
percentage interest rate on the loan.
}
The fact that the
IRS will provide refund within about two weeks, if the return is filed
electronically and the refund deposited electronically.
Both the client and preparer are required to sign
the disclosure.
Enforcement mechanisms.
Three
enforcement mechanisms are provided:
}
The commissioner of
revenue may impose penalties of up to $1,000/violation and terminate the
preparer's authority to transmit returns to DOR, if the preparer engages in a
pattern and practice of violations.
Penalties can be appealed under the contested case procedure under the
APA. The penalties are collected by
DOR under the procedures used to collect unpaid income taxes.
}
The attorney general
can bring an action under the unfair and deceptive trade practice statute.
}
A private right of
action is provided to individuals for actual damages, reasonable attorney
fees and costs.
Exemptions.
The section exempts licensed
professionals (lawyers, CPAs, other licensed accountants, and enrolled
agents) and fiduciaries from the penalty and enforcement provisions. |
|
7
|
Revenue recapture; claimant agency.
Allows
counties to submit revenue recapture claims on behalf of licensed ambulance
services. |
|
8
|
Revenue recapture; administrative fee.
Allows
counties to charge licensed ambulance services a fee to offset the cost of
administering the services' revenue recapture claims. |
|
9
|
Revenue recapture; setoff procedure.
Clarifies
that the fee charged to licensed ambulance services by counties is not added
to the debt subject to revenue recapture. |
|
10
|
Taconite assistance area; Reference.
Corrects
the definition of taconite assistance area enacted in Laws 2003, chapter 127
to geographically include the area that should have been included within
those boundaries.
|
|
11
|
Taconite fiscal disparity area.
Makes a
technical change to maintain the current law boundaries of the taconite
fiscal disparity area due to the new taconite assistance area definition
enacted in Laws 2003, chapter 127.
|
|
12
|
Return filing fee.
Clarifies
that the $5 fee for income tax returns filed in paper form does not apply to
returns that the commissioner requires to be filed in paper form. The fee was enacted in 2003 First Special
Session Chapter 1 (the state government finance bill), and applies to returns
filed by preparers who prepare 100 or more returns per year.
|
|
13
|
Alternative minimum tax charitable
contributions deduction.
Allows individuals to deduct charitable
contributions in excess of 1.0 percent of adjusted gross income from
alternative minimum taxable income.
Current law limits the deduction to contributions in excess of 1.3
percent of the taxpayer's adjusted gross income.
|
|
14 to 28 |
IRRRA service area.
Changes
references to the IRRRA's service area from the "Taconite Tax Relief Area" to
the "Taconite Assistance Area" to be consistent with the changes in
terminology enacted in Laws 2003, chapter 127.
|
|
29
|
Collection of costs for repeat housing code
violations.
Permits a city to collect on the property tax statement the
costs that the city incurs from repeated noncompliance with orders to correct
municipal housing code violations. |
|
30
|
Prohibited
pesticide use; mosquito control district.
Modifies
the entry to property provisions adopted in Laws 2003, chapter 127, to
require that a reasonable attempt to contact an objecting property owner be
made before the owner's property is entered and subjected to pesticide
treatment.
|
|
31
|
BAT study.
Provides a time deadline for
the business tax study of December 2004 and confirms that money required to
pay obligations under the contracts for the study with the U of M may be
spent anytime during the 2004-05 biennium. |
|
32
|
Transfer.
Strikes a $30 million
transfer to the budget reserve account enacted in Laws 2001, First Special
Session. |
|
33
|
Transfers.
Transfers the amounts in the
tobacco use and prevention and local public health endowment fund and in the
medical education endowment fund to the general fund on July1, 2003. |
|
34
|
Budget reserve adjustment.
Authorizes the commissioner of finance to reduce the July 1, 2004
appropriation to the budget reserve account as necessary to balance revenues
and expenditures in the 2004-2005 biennium.
Limits this authority to determinations made before July 1, 2003,
based on the February 2003 forecast for 2004-2005, and changes enacted in the
regular and special legislative sessions. |
|
35
|
State fiscal relief.
Provides
that any general revenue sharing received by Minnesota under the Jobs Growth
and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 is deposited in the general
fund. Revenue sharing would otherwise
be deposited in the federal fund. |
|
36
|
Appropriation; taxpayer assistance
services.
Provides a $200,000
appropriation in fiscal years 2004-2005 ($100,000 per year) from the general
fund to one or more nonprofit organizations for the coordination and
provision of taxpayer assistance services.
Defines "taxpayer assistance services" to mean accounting and tax
preparation services provided by volunteers to help low-income and
disadvantaged taxpayers prepare and file federal and state income tax
returns, and claims for the property tax refund. Authorizes taxpayer assistance services to represent their
clients before the Department of Revenue and the Internal Revenue Service.
|
|
37
|
Appropriation; administration of tax law
changes.
Provides $200,000 to the commissioner of revenue for the costs
of administering tax law changes enacted in 2003. This applies to changes in this bill as well as changes enacted
in Laws 2003, chapter 127. |