Lawmakers and the governor are facing a difficult decision on how to best serve Minnesota veterans who need full-time care — and the clock is ticking.
While there are currently five state-run veterans homes — in Minneapolis, Hastings, Silver Bay, Luverne and Fergus Falls – with a combined 824-bed capacity, there is still room for more. Under a federal government-dictated formula, Minnesota can build housing for 234 more beds eligible for matching building costs and veterans’ services.
The question, however, is where will they build?
Three different locations in Greater Minnesota are jockeying for the opportunity to house and serve veterans who need assistance: Montevideo, Bemidji and Fillmore County. They have the backing of Rep. Tim Miller (R-Prinsburg), who sponsors HF1109, a $16 million bonding plan to construct veterans homes in Montevideo and Bemidji; and Rep. Greg Davids (R-Preston), whose HF79 would prioritize $10 million for a Fillmore County facility.
After initial movement on those bills last session, they currently await action by the House Capital Investment Committee.
“That is the question,” Ben Johnson, legislative director for the Department of Veterans Affairs said Monday. “What are the criteria the Legislature and governor are looking at?”
Johnson said the decision could be based on the concentration of veteran population — the seven-county metropolitan area would win there — or other criteria like geography and underserved areas, an argument that representatives from both Bemidji and Fillmore County have made.
Minnesota is unique, too, in offering some beds to spouses or to Gold Star mothers and fathers.
A veterans home project on “clean land” — that is, ready-to-build plots — would cost an estimated $62.5 million, but the state would initially have to commit 35 percent. In a presentation to the House Veterans Affairs Division and the Senate Veterans and Military Affairs Finance and Policy Committee, Johnson said that a new-build project would take about 18 to 24 months.
If the Legislature includes a new veterans home building project in its bonding proposal this year, 234 beds could be completed by 2024. Under that timeframe, the state would have to submit its initial application documents to the federal government by April 15, 2019.
The number of allocated beds could change if the Legislature doesn’t act by 2020, when new census data is collected and the federal veterans department realigns its priorities. Minnesota is facing stiff competition, too.
“We have noticed a decrease in veterans (in Minnesota) and an increase in Sun Belt states,” Johnson said, noting veterans prefer to live in places like Arizona, Texas and Florida.
The federal government, Johnson said, has assessed Minnesota’s needs are “much less than a lot of states.”
'A very successful session?' Or, 'a debacle?' The reviews are mixed in the immediate aftermath of the 2018 session.
Introduced in March 2017 by Rep. Mary Kunesh-Podein (DFL-New Brighton) and Sen. Carolyn Laine (DFL-Columbia Heights), HF2470/SF2259, aims to stop the cycle of opioid misuse and addiction through education.
The conference committee tasked with hammering out the differences that divide the House and Senate on a laundry list of major issues met for the first time Tuesday afternoon.
Republican legislative majority offers mixed reactions to proposed tax system overhauls and DMV fixes.
The latest numbers are a $517 million swing from the November forecast
The state’s latest economic forecast projects a budget deficit of $188 million for the current two-year biennium, and a $586 million deficit for the 2020-21 biennium
The budget process explained — and why it matters