Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Railroad crossing requirements pass House as amended

Additional requirements could be coming to utility companies looking to establish facilities along railroad tracks.

Sponsored by Rep. Debra Kiel (R-Crookston) and Sen. Dan Sparks (DFL-Austin), HF963/ SF877* would add a subdivision in statute to establish requirements for utilities crossing railroad rights-of-way.

Passed 126-1 as amended by the House Sunday, it now heads back to the Senate.

According to the bill, any utility that intends to place a facility across or upon a railroad right-of-way would need to request permission from the railroad in the form of an application that includes an engineering design showing the location of the proposed facility and the railroad's property, tracks, and wires that the utility would cross. The Public Utilities Commission could charge a railroad and a utility for its proportionate share of expenses incurred during the review of potential petitions against a crossing. A railroad or utility that objects to an assessment has the right to appeal same as a public utility.

A railroad could also require an electric utility to conduct an inductive interference study if the facility would be an electric energy transmission line of at least 125 kilovolts.

The utility could only begin construction of a facility 35 days after application approval unless the railroad notifies the utility in writing that the proposed crossing is a serious threat to the safe operations of either the railroad company, or to the current use of the railroad tracks. Utilities would be required to pay the railroad a one-time standard fee of $1,250 for each facility prior to construction.

A utility would need commercial general liability insurance of at least $1 million for each occurrence. A utility providing natural gas service would need insurance with a limit of at least $5 million for each.

Nothing would prevent a railroad and utility from continuing an existing agreement, or from otherwise negotiating the terms and conditions applicable to a crossing.


Related Articles


Priority Dailies

Ways and Means Committee OKs proposed $512 million supplemental budget on party-line vote
(House Photography file photo) Meeting more needs or fiscal irresponsibility is one way to sum up the differences among the two parties on a supplemental spending package a year after a $72 billion state budg...
Minnesota’s projected budget surplus balloons to $3.7 billion, but fiscal pressure still looms
(House Photography file photo) Just as Minnesota has experienced a warmer winter than usual, so has the state’s budget outlook warmed over the past few months. On Thursday, Minnesota Management and Budget...

Minnesota House on Twitter